Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 09.01.2026
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №6 THE MEANING PARADIGM OF THE ENGLISH EVALUATION VERBS APPRAISE, EVALUATE, ESTIMATE, RATE (BASED ON LINGUISTIC EXPERIMENT) (RETRACTED 26.03.2018)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE MEANING PARADIGM OF THE ENGLISH EVALUATION VERBS APPRAISE, EVALUATE, ESTIMATE, RATE (BASED ON LINGUISTIC EXPERIMENT) (RETRACTED 26.03.2018)

Volkova N.V., Dudochkina O.G., Martinovich E.A.

Information About Author:

The article presents the results of the experiment on the evaluation verbs appraise, evaluate, estimate and rate within the frame of their paradigmatic relations. Method of component analysis helps to determine the meaning elements of the given verbs. The research is conducted with the help of the native speakers. It is discovered that appraise and evaluate have integral semes and can be interchanged in the text, since both of them are the verbs of detailed estimation and professional estimation. Evaluate, therefore, is the most frequently used in the language and is the most neutral among the given verbs and can be called the dominant verb of the group.

Keywords: semantics, paradigmatic relations, evaluation verbs, component analysis, cognitive science

References:

1. Shabanova T. D., Nurieva A. T. K voprosu o znachenii angliyskikh glagolov otsenki i peredache etogo znacheniya na russkiy yazyk [To the question about the meaning of the English evaluation verbs and the ways to interpret this meaning into Russian]. Sistema nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya: shkola – pedkolledzh – vuz [Continuing Education System: School – pedagogical college – university]. Ufa, BGPU Publ., 2015. Pp. 300–302 (in Russian).

2. Frantsuzskaya E. O. K voprosu ob izmenenii leksicheskoy sochetaemosti (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [About changes in the lexical collocation (based on the English language)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2011, vol. 3 (105), pp. 130–132 (in Russian).

3. Seliverstova O. N. Nekotorye tipy semanticheskikh gipotez i ikh verifi katsiya [Some types of semantic hypotheses and their verifi cation]. Gipoteza v sovremennoy lingvistike [Hypothesis in modern linguistics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980. Pp. 262–318 (in Russian).

4. Seliverstova O. N. Trudy po semantike [Works on semantics]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2004. 960 p. (in Russian).

5. Shabanova T. D., Suleymanova D. M., Shvayko Ya. V., Volkova N. V. Semanticheskiye modulyatsii v glagol’noy leksike angliyskogo i russkogo yazykov v edinstve semanticheskogo, kognitivnogo i konstruktivnogo podkhodov [Semantic modulation in the verb lexis of Russian and English in the unity of semantic, cognitive and constructive approaches]. Ufa, BGPU Publ., 2015. 230 p. (in Russian).

volkova_n._v._12_15_6_171_2016.pdf ( 322.31 kB ) volkova_n._v._12_15_6_171_2016.zip ( 312.5 kB )

Issue: 6, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: GERAMNIC AND ROMANCE LANGUAGES

Pages: 12 — 15

Downloads: 1220

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU