DISCOURSE, DISCOURSE ANALYSIS AND LINGUISTIC PROCESSORS
This article deals with the analysis of the discourse in the light of philosophy, sociology, sociolinguistics, culturology, semiotics, text linguistics. The discourse analysis has been depicted from the point of text and context aspects. The levels of analysis of language material for discourse characterization have been distinguished. Frames (concept systems) have been considered as the mental units; their contents are being seen as the discourse. The brief review of linguistic processors MathLab, Gate and WordNet data-base has been done; they are defined as the most effective and automated means of discourse analysis of natural languages. The environment Gate includes the elements of corpus and concept analyses and machine learning. These programmes help to define the slot position of markers in their cognitive model. MathLab automates the algorithm in the analysis of the core concepts.
Keywords: discourse, discourse analysis, linguistic processor, frame, discourse marker, GATE
References:
1. Faritov V. T. Ontologicheskiy status fenomena diskursa [Ontological status of discourse phenomenon]. Epistemologiya i fi losofi ya nauki – Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2014, vol. XXXIX, no. 1, pp. 124–136 (in Russian).
2. Noveyshiy fi losofskiy slovar’ [New Philosophical Dictionary]. Minsk, 1999. 896 p. (in Russian).
3. Beylinson L. S. Professional’nyy diskurs kak predmet lingvisticheskogo izucheniya [Professional discourse as the subject of linguistic study]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Yazykoznanie – Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 2009, no. 1, p. 145 (in Russian).
4. Rusakova O. F., Rusakov V. M. PR-diskurs: Teoretiko-metodologicheskiy analiz [PR-discourse: theoretical and methodological alasis]. Ekaterinburg, UrO RAN, Institut mezhdunarodnykh svyazey Publ., 2008. 340 p. (in Russian).
5. Habermas Yu. Vovlecheniye drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoy teorii [The inclusion of the other: studies in political theory]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2008. 424 p. (in Russian).
6. Rusakova O. F. Osnovnye teoretiko-metodologicheskiye podkhody k interpretatsii diskursa [Main theoretical and methodological approaches to discourse interpretation]. Nauchnyy ezhegodnik Instituta fi losofi i i prava Ural’skogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk – Science Year-Book of the institute of Philosophy and Lawof the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ural Branch, 2007, no. 7, pp. 5–34 (in Russian).
7. Kozhemyakin E. A. Diskursnyy podkhod k izucheniyu kul’tury [Discourse approach to culure study. Modern discourse analysis]. Sovremennyy diskurs-analiz – Modern Discourse Analysis, 2016, issue 1, vol. 1. URL: http://discourseanalysis.org/ada1/st6.shtml (accessed 6 February 2016) (in Russian).
8. Temnova E. V. Sovremennye podkhody k izucheniyu diskursa [Modern approaches to discourse study]. Yazyk, soznaniye, kommunikatsiya: sb. statey [Language, consciousness, communication: collection of articles]. Мoscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2004. 168 p. (in Russian).
9. Harris Z. S. Discourse Analysis. Language, 1952, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–30.
10. Grigor’eva V. S. Diskurs kak element kommunikativnogo protsessa: pragmalingvisticheskiy i kognitivnyy aspekty [Discourse as an element of a communicative protsess: pragmalinguistic and cognitive aspects]. Tambov, Izd-vo Tamb. gos. tekhn. un-ta Publ., 2007. 288 p. (in Russian).
11. Shcherba L. V. Yazykovaya sistema i rechevaya deyatel’nost’ [Language system and speech activity]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1974. 428 p. (in Russian).
12. Borbot’ko V. G. Printsipy formirovaniya diskursa: ot psikholingvistiki k lingvosinergetike [Principles of discourse forming: from psycholinguistics to linguosynergetics]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2011. 288 p. (in Russian).
13. Kibrik A. A. Analiz diskursa v kognitivnoy lingvistike. Dis. dokt. fi lol. nauk [Discourse analysis in cognitive linguistics. Diss. doct. of philol. sci.]. Мoscow, 2003. 90 p. (in Russian).
14. Kibrik A. A. Diskursivnyy analiz [Discourse analysis]. Entsiklopediya “Fond znaniy – Lomonosov” [Encyclopedia “Fund of Knowledge – Lomonosov”]. URL: http://www.lomonosov-fund.ru/enc/ru/encyclopedia:0127182:article (accessed 2 February 2016) (in Russian).
15. Chernyavskaya V. E. Lingvistika teksta. Lingvistika diskursa [Textual linguistics. Linguistics of discourse]. Мoscow, Flinta, Nauka Publ., 2015. 208 p. (in Russian).
16. Deyk T. A. van. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiya [Language. Perception. Communication]. Blagoveshhensk, BGK im. I. A. Boduena de Kurtene Publ., 2000. 308 p. (in Russian).
17. Shapochkin D. V. Metod kognitivnogo analiza diskursa v lingvistike [Methods of cognitive analysis of discourse in linguistics]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Vestnik ChelGU, 2013, no. 10 (301), pp. 101–107 (in Russian).
18. Minskiy M. Freymy dlya predstavleniya znaniy [Frames for knowledge representation]. Мoscow, Energiya Publ., 1979. 152 p. (in Russian).
19. Tonkonogov D. Metody avtomatizirovannogo diskursivnogo analiza nestrukturirovannykh tekstov v zadannom kontekste [Method of automated discourse analysis of the texts with no structure in a certain context]. International Journal “Information Technologies & Knowledge”, 2013, vol. 7 (3), pp. 272–276 (in Russian).
20. Word Net. Defi ciency. URL: http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?c=7&sub=Change&o2=1&o0=1&o8=1&o1=1&o7=&o5=1&o9=&o6=1&o3=1&o4=1&i=-1&h=00&s=defi ciency (accessed 1 February 2016).
21. Gradosel’skaya G. V. Setevoy analiz postsovetskogo informatsionnogo prostranstva: perspektivy razrabotki metodologii – Sbornik statey pamyati A. Kryshtanovskogo [Net analysis of post-Soviet information space: perspectives of methodology development – collection of articles in memory of A. Kryshtanovskogo]. Мoscow, NIU VShE Publ., 2011. 557 p. (in Russian).
22. Hilbert М. A Text-technological Approach to Automatic Discourse Analysis of Complex Texts. Gießen, Institut fur Germanistik Arbeitsbereich Angewandte Sprachwissenschaft und Computerlinguistik Justus-Liebig-Universitat, 2010. 4 S.
23. Gate General Architeture overview – The University of Sheffi eld. URL: http://gate.ac.uk/overview.html (accessed 4 February 2016).
24. The Dictionary of Psychology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015. 896 p.
25. Bolsunovskaya L. M., Zeremskaya Yu. A., Dubrovskaya N. V. Vidy diskursivnykh markerov v russkoyazychnykh i angloyazychnykh nauchnykh stat’yakh po geologii i neftegazovomu delu [Types of discourse markers in Russian and English science articles in the sphere of geology, oil and gas]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2015, vol. 4 (157), pp. 117–123 (in Russian).
26. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010. 1796 p.
27. Kamenskiy M. V. Avtomatizirovannyy analiz korpusa tekstov kak metodologicheskaya osnova postroeniya i verifi katsii kognitivno-funktsional’noy modeli diskursnykh markerov [Automated analysis of corpus texts as the methodological basis of constructing and verifi cation of cognitive and functional model of discourse markers]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina – Pushkin Leningrad State University Bulletin, 2013, no. 4, pp. 200–207 (in Russian).
28. Kuznetsov I. Razrabotka lingvisticheskih protsessorov v srede GATE [Development of linguistic processors in GATE]. Mathlingvo. 2012. URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/2012/03/23/1264653949/gate-mathlingvo-3.3.pdf (accessed 29 January 2016) (in Russian).
( 439.47 kB ) 
( 433.48 kB )
Issue: 6, 2016
Series of issue: Issue 6
Rubric: DISCOURSE LINGUISTICS
Pages: 66 — 70
Downloads: 1552