Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 09.01.2026
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №7 TACTIC OF THREAT AS REALIZATION OF CONFRONTATIONAL STRATEGY IN NEWS GENRE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

TACTIC OF THREAT AS REALIZATION OF CONFRONTATIONAL STRATEGY IN NEWS GENRE

Koshkarova N.N.

Information About Author:

The paper is devoted to the analysis of threat tactic realization on the basis of the news genre. The threat tactic represents the confrontational strategy which exists in the framework of the linguopragmatic block of the coherent models of the conflict and congruous types of discourse. News genre is viewed as functioning in the intercultural political space. The author singles out three cases of the threat tactic realization: the beginning of the conflict communication, the response to some kind of action on the part of the opponent (or the third part), emotional reaction. All the above-mentioned cases present the explication of the threat tactic with the help of lexical, grammatical and other language factors. Outlines the prospects for further research to which belong the analysis of cognitive marked cases of threat tactic realization when the researcher needs additional efforts to classify these or those utterances as being destructive.

Keywords: confrontational strategy, tactic of threat, news genre, conflict discourse, modelling

References:

1. Bolotnova N. S. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: mediynye kommunikativnye universalii [Communicative stylistics of text: media communicative universals]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2015, no. 9, pp. 19–27 (in Russian).

2. Koshkarova N. N. Konfl iktnyy vs. kooperativnyy diskurs v politicheskoy kommunikatsii [Confl ict vs. collaborative discourse in political communication]. Chelyabinsk, SIMARS Publ., 2013. 268 p. (in Russian).

3. Koshkarova N. N. Politicheskoye interv'yu mezhkul'turnogo urovnya: realizatsiya konfrontatsionnoy i kooperativnoy strategiy [Intercultural political interview: realization of confrontational and cooperative strategies]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2015, no. 4 (157), pp. 148–152 (in Russian).

4. Koshkarova N. N. Novostnye zhanry: realizatsiya modeley konfl iktnogo i kooperativnogo tipov diskursa [News genre: realization of the model of confl ict and collaborative types of discourse]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – NSU Bulletin, 2015, vol.14, Issue 6, pp. 146–150 (in Russian).

5. Karasik V. I. Kharakteristiki pedagogicheskogo diskursa [Characteristics of the pedagogical discourse]. Yazykovaya lichnost': aspekty lingvistiki i lingvodidaktiki [Language personality: linguistics and linguodidactics aspects]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 1999, pp. 3–18 (in Russian).

6. Karasik V. I. Religioznyy diskurs [Religious discourse]. Yazykovaya lichnost': problemy lingvokul'turologii i funktsional'noy semantiki [Language personality: issues of linguoculture and functional semantics]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 1999. Pp. 5–19 (in Russian).

7. Karasik V. I. O tipakh diskursa [About the types of discourse]. Yazykovaya lichnost': institutsional'nyy i personal'nyy diskurs [Language personality: institutional and personal discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2000. Pp. 5–20 (in Russian).

8. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ,, 2002. 477 p. (in Russian).

9. Ruzhentseva N. B. Mezhnatsional'nyy diskurs: model' v kontekste epokhi [International discourse; model in the epoch context]. Ekaterinburg, UrGPU Publ., 2013. 292 p. (in Russian).

10. Koshkarova N. N. Transformatsiya zhanra politicheskogo kommentariya v sovremennoy massovoy kommunikatsii [Transformation of the intercultural political commentary genre in modern mass communication]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki – Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2014, no. 3 (40), pp. 98–103 (in Russian).

koshkarova_n._n._17_20_7_172_2016.pdf ( 410.38 kB ) koshkarova_n._n._17_20_7_172_2016.zip ( 404.46 kB )

Issue: 7, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 7

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS

Pages: 17 — 20

Downloads: 1350

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU