Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 11.02.2026
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №7 IMPLEMENTATION OF RHETORICAL ARGUMENTATION STRATEGY IN THE PRESIDENTIAL DISCOURSE OF V.V. PUTIN AND D.A. MEDVEDEV IN COMPARATIVE ASPECT
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

IMPLEMENTATION OF RHETORICAL ARGUMENTATION STRATEGY IN THE PRESIDENTIAL DISCOURSE OF V.V. PUTIN AND D.A. MEDVEDEV IN COMPARATIVE ASPECT

Guohong W.

Information About Author:

The article deals with the rhetorical strategies of the argumentative orientation, implemented in the presidential discourse of V. V. Putin and D. A. Medvedev. The empirical material is the texts of Russian President's speech at the press conferences of 2010–2012. Press conference is a synthetic genre which combined declamatory monologue and public dialogue, as well as in their entirety exhibit features of idiolexicon and idiostyle and linguistic identity politics. There is a high degree of functional loading of the texts of this sort: through policy statements there is the opportunity not just to appeal to both the international community and to its citizens, but also to influence their audience. Political discourse can be considered today as one of the most important objects of analysis in linguistics. Argumentative political activity is defined as the basis of speech influence and the main means of achieving the objectives in the process of communicating with mass audience. The research was carried out within the framework of traditions of rhetorical argumentation. On specific text examples, are considered the methods by means of which are represented the rhetorical argumentative strategies of different types. The author comes to the conclusion that there are similar and different features of idiostyle and idiolexicon of the analyzed linguistic personalities exhibited by them in the framework of media discourse.

Keywords: argumentation, rhetorical argumentation, rhetorical strategy, political communication, presidential discourse

References:

1. Logika I teoriya argumentatsii: uchebno-metodicheskiy kompleks [Logic and theory of argumentation: training-methodical complex]. G. I. Malykhina, M. R. Dis'ko-Shuman. Minsk, BGUIR Publ., 2009. 38 p. (in Russian).

2. Eemeren F. Kh. Van. Sovremennoye sostoyaniye teorii argumentatsii [The present state of the theory of argumentation]. Vazhneyshiye kontseptsii teorii argumentatsii [The most important concept of argumentation theory]. Sankt-Peterburg, SPbGU Publ., 2006. Pp.14–34. (in Russian).

3. Chernova P. A. Teoriya i praktika argumentatsii v sovremennykh gumanitarnykh naukakh [Theory and practice of argumentation in modern humanities]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal'nogo universiteta – Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University, 2008, no. 1, pp. 81–84 (in Russian).

4. Getmanova A. D., Nikiforov A. L., Panov M. I. i dr. Logika: uchebnoye posobiye [Logic: Tutorial]. Мoscow, Drofa Publ., 1995. 156 p. (in Russian).

5. Baranov A. N. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya argumentatsii (kognitivnyy podkhod). Avtoref. dis. d-ra fi lol. nauk [Linguistic theory of argumentation (cognitive approach). Abstract of thesis doct. philol. sci.] Мoscow, 1990. 48 p. (in Russian).

6. Volkov A. A. Teoriya ritoricheskoy argumentatsii [The theory of rhetorical argumentation]. Мoscow, MGU Publ., 2009. 398 p. (in Russian).

7. Aristotel'. Ritorika. Poetika [Aristotle. Rhetoric. Poetics]. Мoscow, Labirint Publ., 2000. 224 p. (in Russian).

8. Issers O. S. Kommunikativnyy menedzhment: tipy rechevykh strategiy [Communicative management: types of speech strategies]. URL: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/21280/72%20-%20Issers.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 18 March 2016) (in Russian).

9. Prigarina N. K. Ritoricheskiy aspekt izucheniya strategiy i taktik argumentativnoy deyatel'nosti [The rhetorical aspect of the study of argumentative strategies and tactics of activity]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – News of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2009, no. 2, pp. 165–168 (in Russian).

10. Gavrilova M. V. Politicheskiy diskurs kak ob’ekt lingvisticheskogo analiza [Political discourse as the object of linguistic analysis]. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya – Polis. Political Studies, 2004, no. 3, pp. 127–139 (in Russian).

11. Khudyakov A. V. Sovremennye issledovaniya prezidentskogo diskursa: teoreticheskiye predposylki i perspektivy [Recent studies of the presidential discourse: theoretical prerequisites and prospects]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2015, no. 2 (44), pp. 206–208 (in Russian).

12. Danilova Yu.Yu., Uchirov P. S. Kommunikativno-strategicheskiye aspekty spichraiterskikh tekstov na materiale inauguratsionnoy rechi V. V. Putina i D. A. Medvedeva [Communicative and strategic aspects of speechwriter texts on the material of inaugural speech of V. V. Putin and D. A. Medvedev]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Herald of Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, 2012, no. 3 (286), pp. 36–42 (in Russian).

13. Mitrokhina T. N. Tsennosti i smysly sovremennoy rossiyskoy politiki: diskurs-analiz press-konferentsiy glavy gosudarstva [Values and meanings of contemporary Russian politics: discourse analysis of press conferences of the head of the state]. Vestnik Saratovskogo sotsial'noekonomicheskogo universiteta – Herald of Saratov State Socio-Economic University, 2014, no. 2, pp. 141–146 (in Russian).

14. Stenogramma vstrechi D. A. Medvedeva v Sankt-Peterburgskom tekhnicheskom universitete so studentami i molodymi uchyenymi [Transcript of the meeting D. A. Medvedev with students and young scientists at the St. Petersburg University of Technology]. URL: http://premier.gov.ru/transcripts/date/2012/9/1/ (accessed 18 March 2016) (in Russian).

15. Stenogramma vstrechi V. V. Putina so studentami-arkheologami i uchyenymi 13 avgusta 2011 g. [Transcript of the meeting V. V. Putin with archeology students and scientists 13 August 2011]. Arkhiv sayta Predsedatelya Pravitel'stva RF V V. Putina. URL: premier.gov.ru (accessed 18 March 2016) (in Russian).

16. Press-konferentsiya V. V. Putina po itogam foruma ATES 9 sentyabrya 2012 g. [Press conference of Vladimir Putin on the results of the APEC forum September 9, 2012]. URL: http://special.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/16424 (accessed 18 March 2016) (in Russian).

17. Press-konferentsiya D. A. Medvedeva na sammite ATES 13 noyabrya 2011 g. [Press conference of Dmitry Medvedev at the APEC summit November 13, 2011]. URL: http://argentina.mid.ru/news/2011/-/asset_publisher/ZEqgs1vrsuGy/content/14–11–2011 (accessed 18 March 2016) (in Russian).

18. Bunimovich E. Volshebnyy yazyk Putina [Magic Putin language]. Soobshcheniye No. 1. Novye yazyki novogo mira [Message no. 1. The new language of the new world]. URL: http://www.soob.ru/n/2004/1/concept/2/ (Accessed: 18 March 2016) (in Russian).

gokhun_v._27_34_7_172_2016.pdf ( 447.81 kB ) gokhun_v._27_34_7_172_2016.zip ( 440.74 kB )

Issue: 7, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 7

Rubric: ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS

Pages: 27 — 34

Downloads: 1380

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU