Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 01.04.2026
Home Issues 2016 Year Issue №10 IMPLEMENTATION OF DISCREDIT SPEECH STRATEGY IN HEADLINES OF BRITISH MASS MEDIA (DURING THE EU REFERENDUM CAMPAIGN)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

IMPLEMENTATION OF DISCREDIT SPEECH STRATEGY IN HEADLINES OF BRITISH MASS MEDIA (DURING THE EU REFERENDUM CAMPAIGN)

Obvintseva O.V.

Information About Author:

The article considers manipulation of mass audience with the help of discredit speech strategy, which is being used in headlines of British printed mass media by adversarial parties during the EU Referendum campaign. It gives a brief outline of the British mass media and their views on the forthcoming referendum. The article claims, that discredit strategy is implemented in the following speech tactics: accusation, offence, intimidation and derision. It also analyses communicative devices and linguistic means which are used in headlines by each of the adversarial parties in order to put into effect the mentioned above tactics and, as a result, to implement discredit speech strategy in the most effective way.

Keywords: speech strategy, speech tactic, communicative device, discredit strategy, mass media, newspaper headline, Brexit

References:

1. Zelinskiy S. A. Informatsionno-psikhologicheskoye vozdeiystviye na massovoye soznaniye [Information-psychological infl uence on mass consciousness]. St. Petersburg, Skifi ya Publ., 2008. 280 p. (in Russian).

2. Wright O. Could the UK media swing it one way or another? URL: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/eu-referendum-could-the-ukmedia-swing-it-one-way-or-another-a7077006.html (accessed 13 June 2016).

3. Issers O. S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi [Communication strategies and tactics of Russian speech]. Moscow, LKI Publ., 2008. 288 p. (in Rissian).

4. Diskreditatsiya [Discredit]. URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/dic_fwords/44805 (accessed 9 June 2016) (in Rissian).

5. The Guardian. URL: http://www.theguardian.com (accessed 10 June 2016).

6. The Telegraph. URL: http://www.telegraph.co.uk (accessed 5 June 2016).

7. The Daily Express. URL: http://www.express.co.uk (accessed 5 June 2016).

8. The Daily Express. URL: http://www.express.co.uk (accessed 8 June 2016).

9. The Guardian. URL: http://www.theguardian.com (accessed 2 June 2016).

10. The Guardian. URL: http://www.theguardian.com (accessed 6 June 2016).

11. The Telegraph. URL: http://www.telegraph.co.uk (accessed 8 June 2016).

12. The Financial Times. URL: http://www.ft.com (accessed 9 June 2016).

13. Varzapova V. Yu. Pretsedentnye fenomeny v zagolovkakh britanskikh mediatekstov kak sredstvo proyavleniya natsional’nogo kul’turnogo koda [Precedent phenomena in headlines of British media texts as a performance of national culture code]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2015, no. 10 (163), pp. 9–14 (in Russian).

14. The Telegraph. URL: http://www.telegraph.co.uk (accessed 11 June 2016).

15. The Independent. URL: http://www.independent.co.uk (accessed 5 June 2016).

16. The Financial Times. URL: http://www.ft.com (accessed 2 June 2016).

17. The Daily Express. URL: http://www.express.co.uk (accessed 9 June 2016).

18. The Independent. URL: http://www.independent.co.uk (accessed 4 June 2016).

19. The Financial Times. URL: http://www.ft.com (accessed 29 May 2016).

20. The Economist. URL: http://www.economist.com (accessed 4 June 2016).

obvintseva_o._v._54_58_10_175_2016.pdf ( 425.07 kB ) obvintseva_o._v._54_58_10_175_2016.zip ( 418.97 kB )

Issue: 10, 2016

Series of issue: Issue 10

Rubric: DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS

Pages: 54 — 58

Downloads: 1498

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU