DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL POTENTIAL OF STUDENTS IN THE SUBJECT OF “PHILOLOGY” (ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE USE OF COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS ELEMENTS)
In the context of the phenomenon of “educational potential of institutions of General education” outlines the key requirements for the results (personal, meta-subject, subject) and the quality of education, the methods of inclusion in the educational process at the level of curricular and extracurricular activities of the elements of comparative historical linguistics, experience enriching educational environment in a particular educational institution. Identifies the potential use of material on the history of language to achieve the procedural requirements of the new standard of basic General education, gaves the characteristics of the educational-methodical complex of the authors T. A. Ladyzhenskaya, etc. from the point of view of the inclusion material and assignments on the history of the Russian language. Describes the framework of the course for extracurricular activities on the Russian language, based on the history of the emergence and development of dictionaries and the formation of skills of work with them.
Keywords: educational potential of the FSES of the second generation, comparative-historical linguistics, educational-methodical complex
References:
1. Verbitskaya L. A. Rol’ yazykovoy normy v praktike obucheniya russkomu yazyku [The role of linguistic norm in the practice of Russian language teaching]. Rhema – Rema, 2011, no. 1, pp. 47–53 (in Russian).
2. L'vova S. I. Uchebnik russkogo yazyka kak osnova obrazovaniya, razvitiya i vospitaniya sovremennogo shkol’nika [Textbook of the Russian language as the basis of education, development and education of the modern student]. Munitsipal'noye obrazovaniye: innovatsii i eksperiment – Municipal education: innovation and experiment, 2013, no. 1, pp. 62–69 (in Russian).
3. Zaliznyak A. A. Iz zametok o lyubitel’skoy lingvistike [A Note on the amateur linguistics]. Moscow, Russkiy mir', Moskovskiy uchebnik Publ., 2009. 240 р. (in Russian).
4. Glukhikh N. V., Mironova A. A. Kommentirovaniye faktov istorii russkogo yazyka v shkol’nom obuchenii [Commenting on the facts of the history of the Russian language in school education]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Herald of Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, 2013, no. 12-2, pp. 206–214 (in Russian).
5. Kuryanovich A. V. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye, lingvodidakticheskiye i metodicheskiye aspekty sovershenstvovaniya yazykovoy kompetentsii v shkole i vuze [Psycho-pedagogical, linguodidactic and methodical aspects of linguistic competence enhancement in schools and universities]. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye – Pedagogical Review, 2015, no. 1 (7), pp. 90–101 (in Russian).
6. Arkhipova O. V. Gumanitarnoye obrazovaniye i gumanitarnaya pedagogika: priroda, spetsifi ka, tseli [Arts education and humanitarian pedagogy: nature, specifi city, goals]. Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitiye (Terre Humana) – Society. Environment. Development (Terra Humana), 2011, no. 2, pp. 192–195 (in Russian).
( 409.66 kB ) 
( 404.21 kB )
Issue: 10, 2016
Series of issue: Issue 10
Rubric: METHODICAL MAINTENANCE OF PHILOLOGICAL EDUCATION
Pages: 133 — 135
Downloads: 1252