Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 05.01.2026
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №6 LINGUISTIC REPERTOIRE OF THE MEANS OF EXPRESSION OF DOWN-TONING TACTICS IN THE STRATEGY OF COMMUNICATION EVADING
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

LINGUISTIC REPERTOIRE OF THE MEANS OF EXPRESSION OF DOWN-TONING TACTICS IN THE STRATEGY OF COMMUNICATION EVADING

Gnezdilova L.B.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-6-9-13

Information About Author:

Gnezdilova L. B., Kuzbass State Technical University named after T. F. Gorbachev (ul. Vesennyaya, 28, Kemerovo, Russian Federation, 650000). E-mail: larisa.gnezdilova@yandex.ru

The author suggests that the conventionalization of the etiquette has led to the appearance of hidden communication strategies, which functioning is interactional communication. Obviously, interactional communication requires the following certain communicative rules. Thus, verbal behavior as a certain series of interrelated speech acts is a model based on a strategic approach. While a communicant is creating a communicative strategy he implements complex thought processes that require consistency, clarity of vision and prediction of the communication process. The author suggests that the strategy is a behavior line that a speaker creates consciously and follows a certain goal. The characteristics of the strategy of evading a direct answer are given. It is considered that the communication strategy of evading a direct answer is realized through individual tactics. In particular, the examples of one of the tactics in this strategy – down-toning tactics – are quoted. The results of the analysis of the linguistic repertoire of communicative means of the tactics are represented. It is revealed that this strategy makes it possible to reduce the overall speaking annoyed conversation background, to distract an interlocutor’s attention, and gain them. Down-toning tactics can be represented by such lexical and grammatical means of the language as modal words, proper names; syntactic language means: introductory phrases and sentences, addressing.

Keywords: direct answer evading, communication strategy, communication tactics, down-toning, communicative analysis

References:

1. Furs L. A. Otsenka rechevykh deystviy cheloveka v angliyskom yazyke [Assessment of human speech acts in English]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. Vyp. 12 (116). Seriya: Gumanitarnyye nauki [Cognitive studies of language. Vol. 12 (116). Series: Humanities]. Tambov, Publishing House of TSU named after G.R. Derzhavin Publ., 2012. P. 265–268 (in Russian).

2. Gnezdilova (Golovash) L. B. Kommunikativnye sredstva vyrazheniya strategii ukloneniya ot pryamogo otveta. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Communicative means of expression of the evading strategy from a direct answer. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Kemerovo, 2008. 18 p. (in Russian).

3. Kirszner L., Mandell S. Literature: Reading, Reacting, Writing. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 2000. 1680 p.

4. Arnol’d I. V. Stilistika sovremennogo angliyskogo yazyka [Stylistics of the modern English language]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1990. 300 p.

5. Ryabova M. Yu. Analiz grammaticheskogo stroya angliyskogo yazyka (kurs lektsiy po teoreticheskoy grammatike): uchebnoye posobiye [Analysis of the grammatical structure of the English language (a course of lectures on theoretical grammar): tutorial]. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat Publ., 2007. 158 p. (in Russian).

gnezdilova_l._b._9_13_5_182_2017.pdf ( 425.15 kB ) gnezdilova_l._b._9_13_5_182_2017.zip ( 419.02 kB )

Issue: 6, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE AND COMPUTER LINGUISTICS

Pages: 9 — 13

Downloads: 1624

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU