Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 29.03.2026
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №10 COGNITIVE PARAMETERS OF LITERARY MODEL OF CREATIVE TEXTS
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

COGNITIVE PARAMETERS OF LITERARY MODEL OF CREATIVE TEXTS

Drozhashchikh N.V.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-10-88-95

Information About Author:

Drozhashchikh N. V., Tyumen State University (ul. Volodarskogo, 6, Tyumen, Russian Federation, 625003). E-mail: ndro2012@gmail.com

The author deals with the cognitive basis of the creative processes which underlie the text formation. The subject matter of the study is the creativity of the literary text. While defining the cognitive parameters which contribute to the formation of the creative nature of the literary text, the author grounds the hypothesis about the creative text as the artful deviation from the automatized conventionality on the structural, communicative, conceptual, and semiotic levels of the literary text. The results of the study demonstrate the multilayered organization of the creative text which is formed by the cognitive processes. Among the processes are the associative connections of the chunks of knowledge, their analogical mapping, ambiguity of meaning, conceptual integration and foregrounding. These processes are viewed as the key processes in the cognitive model of the literary text which form structural, semantic and symbolic transformations that refer to the existing literary archetypes. The text is considered to be creative if the author purposefully foregrounds the semiotic level of the text and transforms it. The semiotic transformation entails the transformation of the elements of the other levels of the text. The usage of the highly frequent lexemes and structural repetitions contribute to the formation of the novel processes of the aesthetics of suspense.

Keywords: language creativity, analogy, association, ambiguity, conceptual integration, foregrounding

References:

1. Halliwell J. O. Popular Rhymes and Nursery Tales: A Sequel to the Nursery Rhymes of England. L., John Russel Smith, 1849. 276 p.

2. Bolotnova N. S. Filologicheskiy analiz teksta: ucheb. posobiye [The philological analysis of the text: textbook]. 4-e izd. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2009. 520 p. (in Russian).

3. Lotman Yu. M. Yan Mukarzhovskiy – teoretik iskusstva [Jan Mukařovský as the scholar of art]. Mukarzhovskiy Ya. Issledovaniya po estetike i teorii iskusstva: per. s cheshsk [Research in aesthetics and the theory of art]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1994. Pp. 8–32 (in Russian).

4. Plotnikova S. N. Kontseptual’ny standart zhanra fentezi [The conceptual standard of the genre of fantasy]. Zhanry rechi: sbornik nauchnykh statey [The genres of speech: the collection of scholarly articles]. Saratov, Kolledzh Publ., 2005. Vol. 4. Genre and concept. Pp. 262–272 (in Russian).

5. Kozhina M. N. Stilistika russkogo yazyka: uchebnik [The stylistics of the Russian language: textbook]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2008. 464 p. (in Russian).

6. Gridina T. A. “Delat’ iz mukhi slona”: assotsiativnaya proektsiya igrovogo slova v khudozhestvennom tekste [“To make an elephant from the fly”: the associative projection of the artful word in the literary text]. Lingvistika kreativa [The linguistics of the creative text]. Under the general editorship of prof. T. A. Gridina. 2nd edition. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical University Publ., 2012. Pp. 272–288 (in Russian).

7. Kupina N. A., Matveeva T. V. Stilistika sovremennogo russkogo yazyka: uchebnik dlya bakalavrov [The stylistics of the modern Russian language: textbook for BA]. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2013. 415 p. (in Russian).

8. Ward T. B., Kolomyts Y. Cognition and Creativity. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. J. C. Kaufman, R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). N.Y., Cambridge University Press, 2010. P. 93–112.

9. The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. R. A. Wilson, F. C. Keil (Eds.). Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 1999. 1096 p.

10. Evans V. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2007. 239 p.

11. Children’s Classic Stories: Fairytales, Fables and Folktales. B. Gallagher (Ed.). Miles Kelly Publishing, 2010. 262 p.

12. Thompson S. Motif-Index of Folk-Literature. 6 Vols. Revised and enlarged edition. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1955–1958.

13. Propp V. Ya. Fol’klor i dejstvitel’nost’: izbrannye stat’i [Folklore and reality: selected articles]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy literatury, 1976. 326 p. (in Russian).

14. Simpson J., Roud S. A Dictionary of English Folklore. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000. 411 p.

15. The English and Scottish Popular Ballads. Child F. J. (Ed.). Vol. 1. N.Y., Dover Publications, 2003. 544 p.

16. Archetypes and Motifs in Folklore and Literature: A Handbook. Garry J., El-Shamy H. (Eds.). N.Y., M. E. Sharpe, Inc., 2005. 515 p.

17. The Oxford Companion to English Literature. 6th edition. M. Drabble (Ed.). N.Y., Oxford University Press, 2000. 1172 p.

18. Fries Ad de. The Dictionary of Symbols and Imagery. North-Holland. Co, 1974. 523 p.

19. Toporov V. Issledovaniya po etimologii i semantike. T. 2: Indoevropeyskiye yazyki i indoevropeistika, kn. 2 [Investigations in etymology and semantics. Vol. 2: Indo-European languages and Indo-European studies, book 2]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur Publ., 2006. 728 p. (in Russian).

20. Buck C. D. A Dictionary of Selected Synonyms in the Principal Indo-European Languages. A Contribution to the History of Ideas. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1949. 1515 p.

21. Apperson G. L., Manser M. H. Dictionary of Proverbs. Wordsworth Editions Ltd., 2006. 656 p.

22. Jacobs A. M. Neurocognitive Poetics: Methods and Models for Investigating the Neuronal and Cognitive-affective Bases of Literature Reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015. Vol. 9. Article 186. DOI: org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186. URL: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186/full (accessed 23 May 2017).

drozhashchikh_n._v._88_95_10_187_2017.pdf ( 399.39 kB ) drozhashchikh_n._v._88_95_10_187_2017.zip ( 390.05 kB )

Issue: 10, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 10

Rubric: GERMANIC LANGUAGES

Pages: 88 — 95

Downloads: 1568

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU