Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 10.01.2026
Home Issues 2017 Year Issue №10 PHONETIC AND PROSODIC FEATURES OF MOTHER’S SPEECH SPECIFIED BY THE SUTIATION OF AWAKING A CHILD
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

PHONETIC AND PROSODIC FEATURES OF MOTHER’S SPEECH SPECIFIED BY THE SUTIATION OF AWAKING A CHILD

Kolmogorova A.V., Varlamova O.N.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-10-127-131

Information About Author:

Kolmogorova A. V., Siberian Federal University (pr. Svobodnyy, 82a, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660041). E-mail: nastiakol@mail.ru Varlamova O. N., Siberian Federal University (pr. Svobodniy, 82a, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660041). E-mail: olga-varlamova@mail.ru

The following article studies phonetic and prosodic changes in mother’s speech. We consider that the situation of awaking a child preconditions these changes. We propose the role of a mother as socially relevant. Mother’s speech is an informational key to the system of a native language. Basing on Russian and the French language, we analyze qualitative and quantitative changes in consonants and vowels in lexical units of different parts of speech, as well as changes in tone and rate of mother’s utterances. We take into account such phonetic phenomena as longitude of a sound, palatalization of consonants, changes of values in tone. The changes of values in tone are illustrated by graphs. The material for analysis includes audio and video of recorded talk between mothers and their children (age from 0 to 10 months). The participants were divided into two groups: 1) Russian-speaking dyad “mother-child” (5 participants); 2) French-speaking dyad “mother-child” (4 participants). To undertake the analysis we applied computer software package for the scientific analysis of speech in phonetics called PRAAT. Resulting in setting minimal and maximal values in tone of analyzed utterances, correlation of longitude of a sound with tone and pragmatic meaning we conclude that these features of mother’s speech are universal for the situation of awaking a child.

Keywords: frequency of the basic tone, mother’s communication, socially relevant role of a mother, speech portrait, phonetic portrait

References:

1. Lyakso E. E., Chelibanova O. V., Galunov V. I. Akusticheskiye kharakteristiki materinskoy rechi, adresovannoy mladentsam vtorogo polugodiya zhizni [Acoustic characteristics of maternal speech addressed to infants of the second half of the first year]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 2003, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 58–67 (in Russian).

2. Gaykova Yu. S., Lyakso E. E. Individual’nyy vklad kharakteristik materinskoy rechi v rechevoye razvitiye rebenka pervogo goda zhizni [Individual contribution of mothers speech characteristics into child`s speech development during the first year of life]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Biologiya – Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Biology, 2011, no. 3, pp. 66–74 (in Russian).

3. Tseytlin S. N. Yazyk i rebenok. Lingvistika detskoy rechi [Language and child: Linguistics of children’s speech]. Moscow, Vlados Publ., 2000. 240 p. (in Russian).

4. Voeykova M. D. Ranniye etapy usvoeniya det’mi imennoy morfologii russkogo yazyka [Early stages of children learning the nominal morphology of the Russian language]. Moscow, Znak Publ., 2011. 328 p. (in Russian).

5. Boyko E. S. Materinskaya rechevaya deyatel’nost’ v sotsiume staroverov na Enisee [Maother’s speech in the society of old believers on the Yenisei]. Krasnoyarsk, KSPU named after V. P. Astafyev Publ., 2011. 328 p. (in Russian).

6. Kolmogorova A. V. “Mamin yazyk”: praktiki materinskogo obshcheniya v kontekste raspredelennoy modeli yazyka i kognitsii [“Mother’s language”: practice of Mother-child communication in the light of distributed model of language and cognition]. Moscow, Nauka-Flinta Publ., 2012. 178 p. (in Russian).

7. Kibrik A. A. Rasskazy o snovideniakh: korpusnoye issledovaniye russkogo yazyka [Night Dream Stories: A corpus study of spoken Russian discourse]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur Publ., 2009. 736 p. (in Russian).

8. Kibrik A. A. Multiodal’naya lingvistika [Multimodal linguistics]. Kognitivnye issledovania [Kognitive Research]. Moscow, IP RAN Publ., 2010. Vol. IV. Pp. 134–152 (in Russian).

9. Gordina M. V., Belyakova G. A. Prakticheskaya fonetika frantsuzskogo yazyka: uchebnoye posobiye [Practical phonetics of French language: textbook]. Saint Petersburg, Knizhniy mir Publ., 2003. 336 p (in Russian).

10. Ashby M., Maidment J. Introducing Phonetic Science. Cambridge, CUP, 2005. 230 p.

kolmogorova_a._v._127_131_10_187_2017.pdf ( 1.15 MB ) kolmogorova_a._v._127_131_10_187_2017.zip ( 1.14 MB )

Issue: 10, 2017

Series of issue: Issue 10

Rubric: COMPARATIVE STUDIES

Pages: 127 — 131

Downloads: 1437

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU