Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 02.04.2026
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №2 THE DIALOGUE AS THE FORM OF THE REPRESENTATION OF DISCURSIVE INTERACTION (A CASE STUDY OF THE RELIGIOUS DIALOGUES IN THE INTERNET)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE DIALOGUE AS THE FORM OF THE REPRESENTATION OF DISCURSIVE INTERACTION (A CASE STUDY OF THE RELIGIOUS DIALOGUES IN THE INTERNET)

Yermolenkina L.I., Smirnova A.E.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-2-116-120

Information About Author:

Yermolenkina L. I., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: arblar2004@rambler.ru Smirnova A. Ye., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: 1_aes@mail.ru

This article is considered as a form of interaction in media communication. Participation of subjects in religious discourse is the basis for the formation of dialogic communication. There are discourse’s mechanisms for the formation of dialogue interaction between communicants: it is value and psycho-speech coordination of participants in communication. Representatives of religious discourse (clergymen and interactive addressees) are subjects of dialogue. Also they are participants in the mass media discourse. Interaction by the subject of communication is occurred in the communicative space (this is the genres of the forum and blog). The features of the interaction of the two discourses are revealed through the analysis of dialogic communication. At first public dialogue as an atypical form of communication for the Orthodox faith reflects the situation of weak coordination of the participants’ positions. Secondly the technical form of Internet communication isn’t conducive to dialogue on the basis of religious values and presumptions. The result of this interaction reflects typological changes in religious discourse – adaptation to the mass media’s norms and conditions. The interaction in the space of religious discourse oriented to orthodox dogmas, traditions, values. The topics of the dialogues are not only religious life, but also worldly interests. The format of the dialogue actualizes a complex of subjective (value priorities of the individual, psychoemotional, social aspects) and objective (discursive state, ideology, collective experience) factors.

Keywords: dialogue interaction, communication in Internet, religious discourse

References:

1. Luman N. Real’nost’ massmedia [Reality of mass media]. Moscow, Kanon Publ., 2012. 240 p. (in Russian).

2. Rezanova Z. I., Ermolenkina L. I., Kostyashina E. A. i dr. Kartiny russkogo mira: sovremennyy mediadiskurs. Red. Z. I. Rezanova [The pictures of the Russian world: the modern discourse of the media. Ed. by Z. I. Rezanova]. Tomsk, ID SK-S Publ., 288 p. (in Russian).

3. Plotnikova S. N. Govoryashchiy/slushayushchiy kak yazykovaya, kommunikativnaya i diskursivnaya lichnost’ [Speaker / listener as language, communicative and discourse personality]. Vestnik Nizhnevartovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Nizhnevartovsk State University, 2008, no. 4 (in Russian).

4. Yermolenkina L. I. Diskursivnaya lichnost’ v kommunikativnom prostranstve sovremennogo radio [Discursive person in communicative space of modern radio]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2017, no. 2, pp. 37–40 (in Russian).

5. Leont’ev A. A. Psikhologiya vozdeystviya massovoy kommunikatsii [Psychology of mass communication manipulation]. Yazyk sredstv massovoy informatsii: uchebnoye posobiye dlya vuzov [The language of the media: textbook for universities]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proyekt: Al’ma Mater Publ., 2008, pp. 133–146 (in Russian).

6. Sinel’nikova L. N. O nauchnoy legitimnosti ponyatiya „diskursivnаy lichnost’“ [About science legitimacy of the concept of discursive person]. Uchenyye zapiski Tavricheskogo natsional’nogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Seriya “Filologiya. Sotsial’nye kommunikatsii” – Proceedings of Taurida National V. I. Vernadsky University. Series: Philology. Social communication, 2011, vol. 24 (63), no. 2, part 1, pp. 454–463 (in Russian).

7. Polonskiy A. V. Pravoslavnoye slovo: ot traditsii svyatootecheskoy k massmediynoy [Orthodox word: from patristic Tradition to the Tradition of Mass-Media]. Nauchnyye vedomosti: Seriya “Gumanitarnye nauki” – Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Humanities Sciences, 2011, no. 12, pp. 197–204 (in Russian).

8. Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Esthetics of verbal creation]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1979. 421 p. (in Russian).

9. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: person, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2002. 477 p. (in Russian).

10. Fyodorova O. V. Eksperimental’nyy analiz discursa [Experemental analyze of discourse]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul`tury Publ., 2014, 512 p. (in Russian).

yermolenkina_l._i._116_120_2_191_2018.pdf ( 364.13 kB ) yermolenkina_l._i._116_120_2_191_2018.zip ( 355.99 kB )

Issue: 2, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF COGNITIVE-DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS, CULTURAL LINGUISTICS AND INTER-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION

Pages: 116 — 120

Downloads: 1447

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU