THE CREATION AND USE OF POTENTIAL TRIAL-SEARCH ACTIONS IN THE COURSE OF PRACTICAL TRAINING OF STUDENTS-PHILOLOGISTS FOR THE FORMATION OF STUDENTS’ UNIVERSAL EDUCATIONAL ACTIONS
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-2-157-161
Reconstructing the experience of using the capacity of some trial-search actions (Karl Popper Debate, joint activity forms: authoritarian, leadership, affiliate) has been proposed for the formation of students’ personal, communicative, regulative and cognitive universal educational actions. A database of the experimental study is the preparation of final grade students for final examination in the format of the Unified state exam in literature. It is suggested that each stage of the educational project (preparatory, theoretical, modeling, and presentational) requires relevant methodological and pedagogical support. The outcome of the project implementation is the development of the students’ subjectivity. This is possible due to the teacher taking an ambivalent position at various stages of the debate: remaining the organizer of the activities he or she can be authoritarian, partner or leader, depending on the nature of the project participants’ initiative. Each of the designated positions is realized in the relevant pedagogical actions, those of «informer», «coordinator», «editor» or «analyst». The development of the project is due to the changing nature of students’ semantic activity. The development and formation of the universal educational actions act as indicators of the project participants’ success. As a whole, the content of the activities organized by the teacher in the transition to new educational standards is discussed in this paper as educational designing within the innovative format. The main feature of this format is the phenomenon of the teacher’s «personal presence» in the design and organization of the educational reality which is created for the attainment of his or her professional goals. The presented project is understood as a way of educational technology introduced in the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of Secondary (complete) General Education.
Keywords: final examination for literature, trial-search action, Karl Popper Debate, joint activity form, ambivalent position of teachers, universal educational actions
References:
1. Federal’nyy gosudarstvennyy obrazovatel’nyy standart vysshego obrazovaniya (utv. Prikazom Ministerstva obrazovaniya nauki RF ot 9.02.2016 g. № 91) [Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education (approved by order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation from 9.02.2016. No. 91)] (in Russian). URL: http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/fgosvob/440305.pdf
2. El’konin B. D. Oposredstvovaniye. Deystviye. Razvitiye [Mediation. Action. Development]. Izhevsk, ERGO Publ., 2010. 280 p. (in Russian).
3. Klochko V. E. Samoorganizatsiya v psikhologicheskikh sistemakh: problemy stanovleniya mental’nogo prostvanstva lichnosti (vvedeniye v transpektivnyy analiz) [Self-organization in psychological systems: problems of formation of the mental space of personality (introduction to transactional analysis)]. Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., 2005. 174 p. (in Russian).
4. Petrova G. I. Filosofskaya antropologiya i antropologicheskaya problematika v filosofii: uchebnoye posobiye [Philosophical anthropology and anthropological perspectives in philosophy: training manual]. Tomsk, NLT Publ., 2002. 160 p. (in Russian).
5. Prozumentova G. N. Obrazovatel’nye innovatsii: fenomen «lichnogo prisutstviya» i potentsial upravleniya (opyt gumanitarnogo issledovaniya) [Educational innovation: the phenomenon of «personal presence» and capacity management (the experience of humanitarian research)]. Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., 2016. 412 (in Russian).
6. Prozumentova G. N. Ya-prostranstvo, sub”ektnaya pozitsiya i individual’nyy profil’ v pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosti. Materialy dlya issledovaniya [I-space, subject position and personal profile in teaching. Materials for research]. Pervyy shag: ot avtoritarizma k avtorstvu: ucheb.-metod. materialy k obrazovatel’noy programme «Pedagog – uchastnik i organizator sovmestnoy deyatel’nosti» [First step: from authoritarianism to authorship: educational-methodical materials for the educational program «Teacher – participant and organizer of joint activities»]. Tomsk, Tomsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 2001. Pp. 6–21 (in Russian).
7. Svetenko T. V. Putevoditel’ po debatam: uchebnoye posobiye dlya pedagogov i uchashchikhsya [A guide to the debate. Study guide for teachers and students] (in Russian). URL: http://ru.idebate.org/sites/live/files/Svetenko_book.pdf
8. Prozumentova G. N. Metodologicheskiye osnovaniya kontseptsii Shkoly sovmestnoy deyatel’nosti [Methodological foundations of the concept of School of Joint Activities]. Shkola sovmestnoy deyatel’nosti: kontseptsiya, proekty, praktika razvitiya. Pod red. G. N. Prozumentovoy. Kn. 1 [School of joint activity: concept, projects, practice development. Edited by G. N. Prozumentova. Book 1]. Tomsk, 1997. 110 p. (in Russian).
9. Asmolov A. G. Sistemno-deyatel’nostnyy podkhod k razrabotke standartov novogo pokoleniya [System and activity approach to development of standards of new generation]. Pedagogika, 2009, no. 4, pp. 18–22 (in Russian).
10. E. de Bono. Shest’ shlyap myshleniya [Six thinking hats]. Minsk, Popurri Publ., 2006. 208 р. (in Russian).
( 427.07 kB ) 
( 418.71 kB )
Issue: 2, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: METHODICAL SUPPORT FOR PHILOLOGICAL EDUCATION
Pages: 157 — 161
Downloads: 1508