Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 10.04.2026
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №6 THE SPECIFICITY OF SYNTACTIC CONSTRUCTIONS FORMED ON THE BASIS OF THE COMBINATION OF THE CONJUNCTION ДА WITH A SPECIFIER ВОТ
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE SPECIFICITY OF SYNTACTIC CONSTRUCTIONS FORMED ON THE BASIS OF THE COMBINATION OF THE CONJUNCTION ДА WITH A SPECIFIER ВОТ

Lyu S.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-6-51-57

Information About Author:

Lyu Syaoin, Far Eastern Federal University (ul. Sukhanova, 8, Vladivostok, Russian Federation, 690000). Henan University of Economics and Law (pr. Czinshuy, 180, Zhengzhou, China, 450046). E-mail: xiaodaxinzang@163.com

This article is devoted to the analysis of the functioning of the combination of the conjunction да with a specifier вот in a variety of syntactic structures. The relevance of the study is determined by the active interest of modern linguistics to function words and, more generally, to means of communication, functioning in different semantic structures. Да вот forms different constructions depending on the main semantics of the conjunction да. This conjunction actualizes negative and connecting relations in our material. Particle вот also performs different functions, for example, the amplifying, anaphoric and cataphoric functions. Sometimes this particle plays an important role in the semantic distinction and addition. Да вот has a characteristic compatibility with such national words and function words as interrogative pronouns and adverbs, noun беда, particles бы, только, хоть, хотя бы, еще, pronominal adverb как-то, etc. This article presents the specific types of syntactic structures built on the basis of the combination да вот. Such structures include question-answer statements and constructions with a rhetorical question. This article also analyzes the application of да вот in idiomatic structures. Material source is National Corpus of the Russian language. Practical significance of the research is that the results benefit can be used to compile a dictionary of function words of the Russian language.

Keywords: syntax, conjunction, conjunctional construction, specifier, semantics

References:

1. Shvedova N. Yu. (ed.) Russkaya grammatika: v 2 t. Vol. II. Sintaksis [Russian grammar: in 2 volumes. Vol. II. Syntax]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980. 709 p. (in Russian).

2. Starodumova E. A. Russkiye chastitsy (pis’mennaya monologicheskaya svyaz’). Avtoref. dis. dokt. fi lol. nauk [Russian particles (written monological communication). Abstract of thesis of doc. of philol. sci.]. Moscow, 1997. 39 p. (in Russian).

3. Starodumova E. A. Chastitsy russkogo yazyka [The particles of the Russian language]. Vladivostok, FEFU Publ., 2002. 292 p. (in Russian).

4. Kolesnikova S. M. Chastitsa vot v russkom predlozhenii: grammaticheskaya transformatsiya, desemantizatsiya i gradual’naya funktsiya [Particle вот in a Russian sentence: grammatical transformation, desemantization and gradable function]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole, 2013, no. 6, pp. 92–96 (in Russian).

5. Loseva S. V. Chastitsy v sisteme metatekstovykh operatorov. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Particles in the system of metatext operators. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Vladivostok, 2004. 24 p. (in Russian).

6. Gur’eva N. N. Osobennosti funkstionirovaniya chastitsy vot i eye proizvodnykh v khudozhestvennykh tekstakh M. E. Saltykova-Shchedrina. Avtoref. dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Peculiarities of functioning of the particle вот and its derivatives in M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin’s literary texts. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Tver’, 2007. 20 p. (in Russian).

7. Shcherban’ G. E. Anaforiko-kataforicheskiye dominantnyye svoystva chastitsy i vot [Anaphoric-kataphoric dominant properties of particle и вот]. Izvestiya Kabardino-Balkarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Proceedings of the Kabardino-Balkarian State University, 2012, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 108–110 (in Russian).

8. Lan Sho. Osobennosti upotrebleniya chastitsy “vot” v proze Yu. V. Trifonova [Features of the use of the particle “вот” in prose Y. V. Trifonov]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2017, no. 8 (74): in 2 parts, part 2, pp. 131–133 (in Russian).

9. Vol’f E. M. Funktsional’naya semantika otsenki [Functional semantics of evaluation]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1985. 226 p. (in Russian).

10. Apresyan V. Yu. Mekhanizmy obrazovaniya i vzaimodeystviya slozhnykh znacheniy v yazyke. Dis. dokt. fi lol. nauk [Mechanisms of formation and interaction of complex meanings in language]. Moscow, 2014. 637 p. (in Russian).

11. Ushakov D. N. (ed.) Tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka: v 3 t. T. 1: A–M [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language: in 3 volumes. Vol. 1: A–M]. Moscow, Veche, Mir knigi Publ., 2001. 704 p. (in Russian).

12. Starodumova E. A. Aktsentiruyushchiye chastitsy v russkom yazyke [Accentuating particles in the Russian language]. Vladivostok, FEFU Publ., 1988. 86 p. (in Russian).

13. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow, Azbukovnik Publ., 1997. 944 p. (in Russian).

14. Skorodumova E. A. Ritoricheskiy vopros-reaktsiya kak sredstvo vyrazheniya emotsiy (na materiale angloyazychnykh khudozhestvennykh tekstov) [Rhetorical question-reaction as a means of expression of emotions (on the material of English literary texts)]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2009, vol. 39, pp. 137–139 (in Russian).

lyu_s._51_57_6_195_2018.pdf ( 511.8 kB ) lyu_s._51_57_6_195_2018.zip ( 504.45 kB )

Issue: 6, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: MODERN ISSUES OF LINGUISTICS

Pages: 51 — 57

Downloads: 1319

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU