Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 10.01.2026
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №6 THE SYMBOLIC ASPECT OF THE RUSSIAN FOLK DANCE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THE SYMBOLIC ASPECT OF THE RUSSIAN FOLK DANCE

Timoshenko L.G.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-6-182-185

Information About Author:

Timoshenko L. G., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kievskaya 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634041). E-mail: timss@sibmail.com

The article considers the symbolic nature of the Russian dance. Implicit information in the vocabulary and figures of Russian dance allows us to consider it as a complex symbolic system and a method of storing information in which encrypted peculiarities of everyday life of the Russian people, the methods of formation of aesthetic, moral and communication skills. Russian folk dance has a long history of development and even in pagan times, was an integral part of many ritual and ceremonial activities, which are reflected especially in labor, life and religious beliefs. With the help of dance people pass on their accumulated experience of life to future generations. Describes how the climatic features of the regions of Russia influenced the formation of the diversity of Russian dance. Semiotic analysis of the basic elements of Russian dance found in it an informative component, encoded in drawings and dance vocabulary. Therefore, further study and reconstruction of the samples of Russian folk dance, which can be called an encyclopedia of people’s lives and the means of education, is a need to review the basic elements of Russian dance from the perspective of semiotics. Reflected in the dance, the specifics of thinking and mentality of the Russian people, the relationship of drawing and dance composition with its arts and crafts, ornaments suit, festive and everyday rituals makes this trend in research not only interesting, but also relevant.

Keywords: semiotic analysis of the dance, vocabulary of dance, Russian folk dance

References:

1. Russkiye narodnye tantsy [Russian folk dances]. In: Baklanova T. I., Strel’tsova E. Yu. (eds.) Narodnaya khudozhestvennaya kul’tura [Folk Art Culture]. Moscow, Moscow State University of Culture and Arts Publ., 2000. 230 p. (in Russian).

2. Gevlenko Y. A. Semioticheskiy analiz tantsa [Semiotic analysis of dance]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2009, no. 320, pp. 87–94 (in Russian).

3. Knabe G. S. Semiotika kul’tury: konspekt uchebnogo kursa [Semiotics of culture: a summary of the training course]. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Publ., 2005. 163 p. (in Russian).

4. Mechkovskaya N. B. Semiotika. Yazyk. Priroda. Kul’tura: kurs lektsiy. 2-ye izd., ispr. [Semiotics. Language. Nature. Culture: lecture course. 2nd edition, revised]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2007. 432 p. (in Russian).

5. Makhlina S. T. Semiotika iskusstva v XXI v. [Semiotics of art in the 21st century]. Vestnik SpbGUKI – Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg State University of Culture and Arts, 2013, no. 3 (16), pp. 6–14 (in Russian).

6. Bochkareva N. I. Russkiy narodnyy tanets: teoriya i metodika: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov vuzov kultury i iskusstv [Russian folk dance: theory and methods of teaching: a textbook for students of higher schools of culture and arts]. Kemerovo, KemGIC Publ., 2006. 179 p. (in Russian).

7. Vychuzhanova L. K. Yazyk khoreografi cheskogo iskusstva kak znakovo-simvolicheskaya sistema [Language of choreographic art as symbolicsymbolic system]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta – Bulletin of Bashkir University, 2009, vol. 14, no. 1. pp. 29–37 (in Russian).

8. Vashkevich N. N. Istoriya khoreografi i vsekh vekov i narodov [History of choreography of all ages and peoples]. Saint Petersburg, Lan’, Planeta muzyki Publ., 2009. 192 p. (in Russian).

9. Bogdanov G. F. Samobytnost’ russkogo tantsa [Identity of the Russian dance]. Moscow, Moscow State University of Culture Publ., 2013. 520 p. (in Russian).

10. Lazareva A. N. Simvolicheskoye znacheniye tantsa v russkoy narodnoy kul’ture [The symbolic signifi cance of Russian folk dance culture]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv – Bulletin of Kazan State University of Culture and Art, 2008, no. 1, pp. 57–60 (in Russian).

timoshenko_l._g._182_185_6_195_2018.pdf ( 419.29 kB ) timoshenko_l._g._182_185_6_195_2018.zip ( 413.61 kB )

Issue: 6, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: PEDAGOGY

Pages: 182 — 185

Downloads: 1976

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU