Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 12.12.2025
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №8 IMAGE COMPONENTS CORRELATION OF THE CONCEPT TRADITION AND ANTICONCEPT FASHION
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

IMAGE COMPONENTS CORRELATION OF THE CONCEPT TRADITION AND ANTICONCEPT FASHION

Larina Mariya Borisovna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-8-14-20

Information About Author:

Larina M. B., Novokuznetsk Institute (branch) of Kemerovo State University (ul. Tsiolkovskogo, 23, Novokuznetsk, Russian Federation, 654041). E-mail: larinamb@mail.ru

The article deals with the problem of «concept» and «anticoncept» relations by the example of concepts TRADITION and FASHION in the English world picture. Concept and anticoncept are interrelated and interconnected. The relations between them and a metaconcept domain are similar to those of hyponyms and a hyperonym but not absolutely identical. Therefore, concept and anticoncept relations shouldn’t be described in terms of antonymy, because these two mental representations are not simply contrasted to each other. They have integrative and distinctive features that can be restored by different means, including association experiment. A study of association links can help in modeling the structure of the concept. The resulting verbal associations reflect the conceptual signs of the concepts TRADITION and FASHION, indicate a deep rootedness in the consciousness of the English cultural stereotypes which are a figurative representation of what is traditional and what is fashionable. The full spectrum of obtained associations allows to speak about the specifics of the conceptual connections in the consciousness of English-speakers. On the basis of the association experiment data analysis, it is proposed to treat concepts TRADITION and FASHION as concept and anticoncept correspondingly and to determine them as interrelated and interconnected oppositions included in the same metaconcept domain VALUES and forming its poles.

Keywords: concept, anticoncept, metaconcept, moral values, association experiment

References:

1. Levin U. I. Izbrannye trudy. Poetika. Semiotika [Selected works. Poetics. Semiotics]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1998. 824 p. (in Russian).

2. Larina M. B. Srtategitcheskaya sostavlayushchaya kontseptov MAGIC i GLAMOUR [Strategical indication of the concepts MAGIC and GLAMOUR]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2011, no. 9 (111), pp. 88–93 (in Russian).

3. Stepanov U. S. Kontsepty. Tonkaya plenka tsivilizatsii [Concepts. Thin film of civilization]. Moscow, 2007. 248 p. (in Russian).

4. Plokhinskiy N. A. Biometriya. 2-ye izdaniye [Biometrics. 2d edition]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 1970. 83 p. (in Russian).

5. Novodranova V. L. Russkaya leksikografiya [Russian lexicography]. Moscow, Drofa Publ., 2009. Pp. 263–288 (in Russian).

6. Larina M. B. Korrelyatsiya kontsepta i antikontsepta v lingvokul’ture (na materiale kontseptov MAGIC i GLAMOUR). Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Concept and anticoncept coorelation in linguaculture (by the example of concepts MAGIC and GLAMOUR). Diss. kand. of philol. sci.]. Novokuznetsk, 2011. 180 p. (in Russian).

7. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2004. 390 p. (in Russian).

8. Sternin I. A. Znacheniye i kontsept: skhodstva i razlitchiya [Meaning and concept: similarities and differences]. Yazykovaya lichnost’: tekst, slovar’, obraz mira: sb. statey [Language personality: text, dictionary, world picture: collection of articles]. Moscow, Izd. RUDN Publ., 2006. Pp. 403–495 (in Russian).

9. Zalevskaya A. A. Vvedeniye v psikholingvistiku [Introduction into psycholinguistics]. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Publ., 1999. 382 p. (in Russian).

10. Cherneyko L. O., Dolinskiy V. A. Imya sud’ba kak ob’’ekt kontseptual’nogo i assotsiativnogo analiza [The name fate as the object of conceptual and associative analysys]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – MSU Bulletin, 1996, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 20–41(in Russian).

11. Boldyrev N. N. Perekategorizatsiya glagola kak sposob formirovaniya smysla vyskazyvaniya [Verb recategorisation as a means of forming the content of the utterance]. Izvestila AN. Seriya literatury i yazyka, 2001, pp. 103–146 (in Russian).

larina_m._b._14_20_8_197_2018.pdf ( 634.75 kB ) larina_m._b._14_20_8_197_2018.zip ( 506.2 kB )

Issue: 8, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: COGNITIVE-DISCOURSIVE LINGUISTICS AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS

Pages: 14 — 20

Downloads: 1428

For citation:


2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU