THE SPEECH MOVES TO IMPLEMENT THE COMMUNICATION TACTICS OF RESPONSE EVASION
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-8-34-38
The article clarifies the concepts of communicative strategy, communicative tactics, communicative and speech course and discusses the speech moves that are used by the speaker to implement communicative tactics of response evasion. Evasion is an insincere speech reaction of the respondent, who deliberately hides the fact that he cannot or does not want to answer the question. Communicative tactics of evading response is a complex of speech actions, which are directed on implicit expression of unwillingness of the addressee of a question to provide the requested information. Evasion of the answer can be carried out in different ways, with different speech moves. When clarifying the question, the addressee answers the question with a question. When providing a demonstrative uninformative response, representative speech act (for example, a message) serves as a speech course for implementing the tactics of evading response. The answer can be forwarded to the inquirer by means of a counter-question or by means of a direct or indirect speech act of council. For switching the interrogator’s attention to another subject, the addressee of the question can use a message, a question, a sentence, etc. When demonstratively pointing to the impossibility of answering the question, the addressee may use expressive, representative, directive speech act (a statement reflecting the addressee’s dissatisfaction with the question, objection, message, proposal, etc.).
Keywords: communicative strategy, communicative tactics, communicative course, speech course, evasion of the answer
References:
1. Issers O. S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi [Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech]. Moscow, URSS Publ, 2008. 288 p. (in Russian).
2. Karasik V. I. Sotsial’nyy status cheloveka v lingvisticheskom aspekte [The person’s social status in the linguistic aspect]. «Ya», «sub”ekt», «individ» v paradigmakh sovremennogo yazykoznaniya: sb. nauchno-analiticheskikh obzorov [«I», «subject», «individual» in the paradigms of modern linguistics: collection of scientific and analytical reviews]. Moscow, The Institute of Linguistics, Russsian Academy of Sciences Publ., 1992. Pp. 47–85 (in Russian).
3. Makarov M. L. Osnovy teorii diskursa [Fundamentals of the theory of discourse]. Moscow, ITDGK «Gnozis» Publ., 2003. 280 p. (in Russian).
4. Saenko O. A. Kommunikativnyy khod vozrazheniya v sovremennom frantsuzskom yazyke. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [The communicative move of the objection in the modern French language. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Irkutsk, 2005. 165 p. (in Russian).
5. Spoken W. Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London, 1981. 217 p.
6. Paducheva E. V. Vyskazyvaniye i ego sootnesennost’ s deystvitel’nost’yu. Referentsial’nye aspekty semantiki mestoimeniy [Statement and its correlation with reality. Referential aspects of the semantics of pronouns]. Moscow, LKI Publ., 1985. 288 p. (in Russian).
7. Brozhenko S. V. Strategiya differentsiatsii i yazykovye sredstva eyo realizatsii v reklamnom diskurse. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Differentiation strategy and language means of its implementation in advertising discourse. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Chelyabinsk, 2011. 130 p. (in Russian).
8. Klyuev E. V. Rechevaya kommunikatsiya [Speech communication]. Moscow, Ripol Klassik Publ., 2002. 320 p. (in Russian).
9. Romanov A. A. Sistemnyy analiz regulyativnykh sredstv dialogicheskogo obshcheniya [Systematic analysis of the regulatory tools of dialogical communication]. Moscow, Institute of Linguistics of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR Publ., 1988. 183 p. (in Russian).
10. Churikov M. P. Soglasiye, nesoglasiye i ukloneniye v aspekte rechevogo obshcheniya. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Consent, disagreement and evasion in the aspect of speech communication. Dis. cand. philol. sci.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2005. 168 p. (in Russian).
( 531.88 kB ) 
( 387.83 kB )
Issue: 8, 2018
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: COGNITIVE-DISCOURSIVE LINGUISTICS AND CULTURAL LINGUISTICS
Pages: 34 — 38
Downloads: 1577