Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 16.02.2026
Home Issues 2018 Year Issue №8 SOLUTIONS TO WORD PROBLEMS IN A CORRECTIONAL SCHOOL
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

SOLUTIONS TO WORD PROBLEMS IN A CORRECTIONAL SCHOOL

Akhtamova S.S.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2018-8-121-128

Information About Author:

Akhtamova S. S., Lesosibirskij Pedagogical Institute - branch of Siberian Federal University (mikrorayon 9, 13/35, Lesosibirsk, Russian Federation, 662547). E-mail: ahtamova-ss@mail.ru

The article deals with the concept of a text task and its role in the mathematics course of primary school. The peculiarities and objectives of the mathematics lesson in a correctional school of the VIII type are revealed. The main contradictions that confirm the formulation of the problem of forming skills to solve text tasks by younger students with disabilities (for example mental retardation) are identified. Difficulties of building a simple reasoning when performing mathematical tasks by younger pupils of the correctional school are analyzed. Allocated and justified psychological and pedagogical conditions that contribute to the optimal formation of skills in solving text tasks by pupils with developmental delays. It describes the steps of the joint work of a teacher and a child on solving text tasks as tools for the most effective assimilation of trainees and educational programs and inclusive spaces in the educational institution. Considers the features of modeling in the process of solving constituent problems and general methods of teaching primary school children with delays in development of the solution of text tasks. Modeling is presented as an open co-reflexive actions of all participants of educational space. In the review of literature on the research topic selected educational material for analysis. Makes practical recommendations on solving and composing text tasks for teachers of correctional schools. The positive results of the work done.

Keywords: disabilities, mental retardation, teaching math, text task

References:

1. Puzanov B. P. Korrektsionnaya pedagogika: uchebnoye posobiye [Correctional pedagogy]. Moscow, Znaniye Publ., 2014. 600 p. (in Russian).

2. Zabramnaya S. D., Isayeva T. N. Nekotorye psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye pokazateli razgranicheniya stepeney umstvennoy otstalosti u detey na nachal’nom etape shkol’nogo obucheniya [Some psychological and pedagogical indicators of differentiation of degrees of mental retardation in children at the initial stage of schooling]. Korrektsionnaya pedagogika: teoriya i praktika, 2008, no 1, pp. 5–13 (in Russian).

3. Svechnikov A. A. Resheniye matematicheskikh zadach v 1–3 klassakh: posobiye dlya uchitelya [The solution of mathematical problems in 1-3 classes]. Moscow, Ripol Publ., 1995. 352 p. (in Russian).

4. Stoylova L. P. Matematika: uchebnik dlya studentov otdeleniy i fakul’tetov nachal’nykh klassov [Mathematics: a textbook for students of departments and faculties of primary school]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2008. 278 p. (in Russian).

5. Kuznetsov M. I., Kochurov E. E. Metodika provedeniya pedagogicheskoy diagnostiki i komplekt diagnosticheskikh materialov, opredelyayushchikh gotovnost’ detey k obucheniyu v shkole [Methods of pedagogical diagnostics and set of diagnostic materials determining the readiness of children to study at school]. Nachal’naya shkola, 2002, no 3 (in Russian).

6. Menchinskaya N. A., Moro M. I. Voprosy metodiki i psikhologii obucheniya arifmetike v nachal’nykh klassakh [Questions of methodology and psychology of teaching arithmetic in primary school]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 1965 (in Russian).

7. Demidova T. E., Tonkikh A. P. Teoriya i praktika resheniya tekstovykh zadach [Theory and practice of solving text problems]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2001. 234 p. (in Russian).

8. Perova M. N. Metodika prepodavaniya matematiki v spetsial’noy (korrektsionnoy) shkole VIII vida [Methods of teaching mathematics in a special (correctional) school VIII type]. Moscow, VLADOS Publ., 2001. 408 p. (in Russian).

9. Fridman L. M. Syuzhetnye zadachi po matematike (Istoriya, teoriya, metodika: ucheb. pos. dlya uchiteley i studentov pedvuzov i kolledzhey) [Story problems in mathematics (History, theory, techniques: study guide for teachers and students of pedagogical universities and colleges)]. Moscow, Shkol’naya pressa Publ., 2002. 208 p. (in Russian).

10. Istomina N. B. Metodika obucheniya matematike v nachal’nyh klassah: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov srednikh i vysshikh pedagogicheskikh uchebnykh zavedeniy [Methods of teaching mathematics in primary school: textbook for students of secondary and higher pedagogical educational institutions]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2001 (in Russian).

11. Bantova M. A., Bel’tyukova G. V. Metodika prepodavaniya matematiki v nachal’nykh klassakh [Methods of teaching mathematics in primary school]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1984. (in Russian).

12. Zaytseva S. A., Tselishcheva I. I. Resheniye sostavnykh zadach na urokakh matematiki [Solving complex problems in math lessons]. Moscow, Chistye prudy Publ., 2006. 32 p. (in Russian).

13. Zaytseva S. A., Tselishcheva I. I. Modelirovaniye prostykh tekstovykh zadach [Modeling simple text problems]. Moscow, Chistye prudy Publ., 2005. 32 p. (in Russian).

14. Shelekhova L. V. Syuzhetnye zadachi po matematike v nachal’noy shkole [Plot problems in mathematics in primary school]. Moscow, Chistye prudy Publ., 2007. 32 p. (in Russian).

15. Smoleusova T. V. Vospitatel’nyy potentsial matematicheskogo obrazovaniya v usloviyakh FGOS [The educational potential of mathematics education in the framework of GEF. Methods innovations]. Sibirskiy uchitel’, 2016, no. 1 (104) (in Russian).

16. Andreev V. N., [et al.] Distantsionnoye obrazovaniye detey-invalidov. Zarubezhnyy opyt. Pod red. Shaydenko N. A., Fomicheva Zh. E. [Distance education of disabled children. Foreign experience. Ed. by Shaydenko N. A., Fomicheva Zh. E.]. Tula, Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University Publ., 2015. 57 p. (in Russian).

akhtamova_s._s._121_128_8_197_2018.pdf ( 1.09 MB ) akhtamova_s._s._121_128_8_197_2018.zip ( 429.8 kB )

Issue: 8, 2018

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: CHILDREN AND YOUTH EDUCATION

Pages: 121 — 128

Downloads: 1679

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU