RUSSIAN SATIRICAL APHORISM OF 1905-1907: POETICS AND TYPOLOGY
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-1-38-48
Introduction. The comic aphorism is usually considered in the framework of parody forms, although its genre potential is much wider. Comic aphorism as a genre form is one of the super-small genres, widely spread in satirical and comic journals and play important role in periods of mass interest in publications of this type. Aim and objectives. The purpose of this work is to determine the place and functions of aphorism in the Russian satire of 1905-1907, to identify poetics and typology of aphorisms in this period, which allows us to make theoretical and historical-literary conclusions concerning comic aphorism as a genre form. Material and research methods are based on a frontal study of the available corpus of sources, including satirical-humorous Russian magazines of 1905-1907. The article explores the comic aphorism as a genre, as separate text written with the corresponding author’s intention. The historical-typological and historical-functional approach and the structural analysis provide an opportunity to identify the role of context in the poetics of satirical aphorism and the main models of construction of aphorism and cycles of aphorisms. Results and discussion. Comic aphorism is included into the system of comic genres both functionally and conceptually. The opinion expressed in the form of aphorism is dictated as authoritative and rational. Aphorism allows to achieve the highest possible level of generalization and satirical typing by minimal means: at the potention of the genre form and its conventional perception. Context plays an important role: the author’s intention requires an appropriate reader’s reception. In most cases, the genre form of aphorisms in magazines of 1905-1907 was clearly marked: the genre setting was expressed in the definition given by the author or the editor, which set the appropriate reader’s perception. Another form of fixation is the declared connection with the corresponding literary tradition (K. Prutkov). Conclusion. The main intention in aphorisms of 1905-1907 is not parody (like Prutkov) but satirical. Among the subjects of satirical aphorisms are almost all spheres of the state and social order. Aphorisms also concern persons and situations that had a great resonance. The subject of the statement can become the object of satirical image: most often, such comic aphorism is created as a direct speech. Theoretical contribution. The research proves that comic aphorism as a genre must not be considered as only a parody form. It is one of the ultra-small genres that are widely used in satirical and humorous magazines in Russia and play a particularly important role in the periods of mass interest in publications of this type. The wide spread of comic satirical aphorism in 1905-1907 is determined both by the formal structure of satirical magazines, which widely used ultra-small genres, and by the genre possibilities of satirical aphorism, which acquires a bright, sharp and universal character. The content of the statement combines accusatory pathos, comic intention, a high degree of generalization and the associated axiomatic categoricity. Self-incriminating statements are put into the mouths of real public figures who become the target of satire. Practical significance. The results of the work would be used in the studying of Russian literature of the 20th century, Russian satire and in lecture courses on the theory and history of satire and aphorism as genre.
Keywords: aphorism, satire, sarcasm, satirical magazines, the First Russian revolution, comic, Kozma Prutkov, P. Potemkin
References:
1. Aforizm [Aphorism]. Kratkaya literaturnaya entsyclopediya: v 9 tomakh. Tom. 1. [Brief literary encyclopedia: 9 volumes. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsyklopediya Publ., 1962. P. 366 (in Russian).
2. Fedorov A. Aforizm [Aphorism]. Slovar’ literaturovedcheskikh terminov. Red.-sost. L. I. Timofeev, S. V. Turayev [Dictionary of literary terms. Ed. by L. I. Timofeev, S. V. Turaev]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1974. P. 23 (in Russian).
3. Kulishkina O. N. Russkiy aforizm XIX – nachala XX vekov: evolyutsiya i sfery vliyaniya zhanra. Avtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Russian aphorism in XIX – beg. of the XX centuries: evolution and the sphere of influence of the genre. Abstract of thesis of doct. philol. sci.]. Saint Petersburg, 2004. 41 p. (in Russian).
4. Ol’shanskiy I. G., Mel’nikova O. V. Aforistika kak ob’’yekt filologicheskikh issledovaniy [Aphoristics as an object of philological research]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gos. lingvistich. un-ta – Vestnik of the Moscow state linguistic university, 2009, no. 559, pp. 63–80 (in Russian).
5. Kulishkina O. N. Russkiy aforizm XIX – nachala XX vv.: istoriya zhanra (ot Pushkina do Rozanova) [Russian aphorism in XIX – beg. XX centuries: history of the genre (from Pushkin to Rozanov)]. Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University of Technology and Design Publ., 2009. 223 p. (in Russian).
6. Janosch. Das Wörterbuch der Lebenskunst. München: Goldmann, 2000. 94 s.
7. Nefedova L. A. Slovar’ shutlivykh aforizmov Yanosha [Dictionary of humorous aphorisms by Janos (to the question of lexicography of aphorisms)]. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik – Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2005, no. 3 (44), pp. 133–138 (in Russian).
8. Nikolaev D. D. O edinstve russkoy komicheskoy literatury XX veka [On the unity of the Russian comic literature of the XX century]. Komicheskoye v russkoy literature XX veka [Comic in Russian literature of the twentieth century]. Moscow, Institute of World Literature named after A. M. Gorky RAS Publ., 2014. Рp. 5–19 (in Russian).
9. Bocianowski V., Hollerbach E. Russkaya satira pervoy revolutsii 1905–1906 [Russian satire of the first revolution 1905–1906]. Leningrad, GIZ Publ., 1925. 221 p. (in Russian).
10. 1905 god v satire i yumore. Sost. S. Dreyden [1905 year in satire and humor. Comp. S. Dryden]. Leningrad, 1925. 154 p. (in Russian).
11. Ninov А. А. Russkaya satiricheskaya poeziya 1905–1907 godov [The Russian satirical poetry of 1905–1907]. Stikhotvornaya satira pervoy russkoy revolyutsii (1905–1907). Vstup. stat’ya A. A. Ninova, sost., podg. tekstov i prim N. B. Bank, N. G. Zakharenko, E. M. Shneydermana [The Poetic satire of the first Russian revolution (1905–1907). Intr. by А. А. Ninov. Notes by N. B. Bank, N. G. Zakharenko, E. M. Schneiderman]. Leningrad, Sovietskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1969. Pp. 5–76 (in Russian).
12. Revolyutsiya 1905–1907 godov i literatura [The revolution of 1905–1907 and literature]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1978. 272 p. (in Russian).
13. Komicheskoye v russkoy literature XX veka [Comic in Russian literature of the twentieth century]. Moscow, Institute of World Literature named after A. M. Gorky RAS Publ., 2014. 504 p. (in Russian).
14. Spiridonova (Evstigneeva) L. A. Russkaya satiricheskaya literatura nachala XX veka [Russian satirical literature of the early twentieth century]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. 303 p. (in Russian).
15. Mednis M. I. Zhanr yumoristicheskogo aforizma i ego evolutsiya v russkoy periodike XX veka [Humorous aphorism as the genre and its evolution in the Russian periodicals of the XXth century]. Mir russkogo slova, 2013, no. 2, pp. 53–58 (in Russian).
16. Galepa M. A. Fel’yetony i aforizmy na stranitsakh “Donskikh oblastnykh vedomostey” v period deyatel’nosti II Gosudarstvennoy Dumy Rossii [Feuilletons and aphorisms on the pages of “Donskiye oblastnye vedomosti” during the period of activity of the II State Russian Duma]. Natsional’naya assotsiatsiya uchenykh, 2015, no. 6–3 (11), pp. 53–56 (in Russian).
17. Nikolaev D. P. Smekh – oruzhiye satiry [Laughter – the weapon of satire]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1962. 193 p. (in Russian).
18. Shestopalova G. Aforizmy v proizvedeniyakh M. E. Saltykova-Shchedrina [Aphorisms in the works of M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Series: Russian Philology – Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University Bulletin. Series: Russian Philology, 2013, no. 1, pp. 31–35 (in Russian).
19. Nikolaev D. D. Tvorchestvo N. A. Teffii i A. T. Averchenko: Dve tendentsii razvitiya russkoy yumoristiki. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [The Works of N. A. Teffi and A. T. Averchenko: Two trends of evolution of Russian humor. Abstract of thesis of cand. philol. sci.]. Moscow, 1993. 24 p. (in Russian).
20. Nikolaev D. D. M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin i russkiye satiriko-yumoristicheskiye zhurnaly 1901–1917 gg. [M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin and Russian satirical and humorous journals of 1901–1917]. M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin i russkaya satira XVIII–XX vekov [M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin and Russian satire of the XVIII-XX centuries]. Moscow, Naslediye Publ., 1998. Pp. 239–267 (in Russian).
( 455.08 kB ) 
( 444.48 kB )
Issue: 1, 2019
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: PROBLEMATICS AND POETICS OF RUSSIAN LITERATURE OF THE XIX–XXI CENTURIES
Pages: 38 — 48
Downloads: 1774