Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 13.02.2026
Home Issues 2019 Year Issue №2 CONCEPT “BREAD” IN WORLD PICTURE OF RUSSIAN PEOPLE
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

CONCEPT “BREAD” IN WORLD PICTURE OF RUSSIAN PEOPLE

Guseynova U.G.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-2-28-33

Information About Author:

Guseynova U. G., Baku State University (ul. Akademika Z. Khalilova, 23, Baku, Azerbaijan, AZ1148). E-mail: bgu-ul@bk.ru

The article deals with problems of cognitive linguistics. The fundamental concepts comprising world language picture is the centre of attention. The article traces the verbalization of the concept of “bread” in the Russian language, using materials from the academic dictionary that contain some phraseological units with component “bread”, each of which implements one of the main cognitive features of this concept. On the basis of the examples given, it is shown that the degree of phraseologization of these units is different, but nevertheless all of them retain a connection with the original denotate. This circumstance contributes to the preservation of positive connotations in this phraseological paradigm. The analysis of cognitive signs to identify the scope of the concept of “bread” in the language picture of the world of the Russian people is carried out. The question of the original meaning, which forms the main nominative meaning of the word “bread” in Russian, which is present in the semantic structure of all derivatives, regardless of the degree of their distance from the creation of a semantic base, is considered. For the bulk identification of the concepts of “bread” in the linguistic picture of the world of Russian people, an analysis was conducted on the basis of cognitive signs. The fundamental nature of the concept “bread” in a language picture of the world of the Russian people with all evidence is shown at all levels. A complete idea of the scope of this concept can be created only with regard to folklore material. However, the system of the most important cognitive signs is successfully traced on the material of lexical, phraseological and paremiological units. We have been collecting the corresponding materials from dictionaries of V. I. Dal, V. M. Ogoltsev, D. N. Ushakov, M. Fasmer, and the four-volume academic dictionary of Russian (the Small Academic dictionary). The task of cognitive or linguistic-cognitive analysis is to analyze language units, focused on identifying cognitive signs that represent this concept in the structure of a particular character. The research shows that cognitive characteristics realized by the concept “bread” embrace the image of bread in the national thinking of Russian nation.

Keywords: concept, bread, world picture, cognitive sign, verbalization

References:

1. Ogol’tsev V. M. Slovar’ ustoychivykh sravneniy russkoqo yazyka [The dictionary of steady comparisons of Russian]. Мoscow, Russkiye slovari. АSТ. Astrel’ Publ., 2001. 799 p. (in Russian).

2. Bibliya. Knigi Vetkhogo i Novogo Zaveta [Bible. Books Old and New testament]. Мoscow, Rossiyskoye Bibleyskoye obshchestvo Publ., 1995. 1254 p. (in Russian).

3. Zhuravlev A. F. Yazyk i mif [Language and myth]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2005. 1006 p. (in Russian).

4. Slovar’ russkoqo yazyka: v 4 tomakh. T. 4 [Russian dictionary in 4 volumes. Vol. 4]. Мoscow, Russkiy yazyk Publ., 1984. 384 p. (in Russian).

5. Stepanov Yu. S. Konstanty: slovar’ russkoy kul’tury [Constants. Dictionary of Russian culture]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2004. 992 p. (in Russian).

6. Teliya V. N. Russkaya frazeologiya. Semanticheskiy, pragmaticheskiy i lingvokul’turologicheskiy aspekty [Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguistic cultural aspects]. Moscow, Shkola “Yazyki russkoy kul’tury” Publ., 1996. 288 p. (in Russian).

7. Maslova V. A. Lingvokul’turologiya [Cultural linguistics]. Мoscow, Akademiya Publ., 2001. 208 p. (in Russian).

8. Kozlova I. Ye., Grebenkina I. N. Obraznyye vyrazheniya s naimenovaniyem “khleb” vo frantsuzskom i russkom yazykakh: lingvokul’turologicheskiy i diskursivnyy aspekty [Figurative expressions denominating “bread” in the French and Russian languages (linguoculturological and discursive aspects)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2017, vol. 6 (183), pp. 107–111 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-6-107-111.

9. Zaliznyak A. A., Levontina I. B., Shmelev A. D. Klyuchevyye idei russkoy yazykovoy kartiny mira [Key ideas of Russian language picture of the world]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2005. 544 p. (in Russian).

10. Fasmer М. Etimoloqicheskiy slovar’ russkoqo yazyka. T. III [Etymological dictionary of Russian. Vol. III]. Мoscow, Progress Publ., 1971. 827 p. (in Russian).

11. Tresidler J. Slovar’ simvolov [Dictionary of symbols]. Мoscow, Fair-Press Publ., 2001. 448 p. (in Russian).

12. Yurina E. A., Avramenko O. V., Pomarolli G. Universal’nyye aspekty metaforizatsii obrazov zerna i khleba v russkom, angliyskom i ital’yanskom yazykakh [The images of grain and bread in Russian, English and Italian languages: universal aspects of metaphorization]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2017, vol. 11 (188), pp. 135–139 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-11-135-139.

13. Dal’ V. I. Poslovitsy russkoqo naroda. T. 2 [Proverbs of Russian people. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1984. 400 p. (in Russian).

14. Ushakov D. N. Tolkovyy slovar’ russkoqo yazyka. T. 3 [Russian explanatory dictionary. Vol. 3]. Мoscow, Veche. Mir knigi Publ., 2001. 481 p. (in Russian).

15. Yakovleva E. S. Fragmenty russkoy yazykovoy kartiny mira (modeli prostranstva, vremeni i vospriyatiya) [Fragments of Russian language picture (model of space, time and perception)]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 1994. 344 p. (in Russian).

guseynova_u._28_33_2_199_2019.pdf ( 424.87 kB ) guseynova_u._28_33_2_199_2019.zip ( 418.07 kB )

Issue: 2, 2019

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: CURRENT ISSUES OF RUSSIAN STUDIES

Pages: 28 — 33

Downloads: 1543

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU