Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 09.12.2025
Home Issues 2019 Year Issue №5 REVEALING LINGUISTIC FEATURES OF PTSD IN THE NOVEL THE PERKS OF BEING A WALLFLOWER BY THE AMERICAN WRITER STEPHEN CHBOSKY
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

REVEALING LINGUISTIC FEATURES OF PTSD IN THE NOVEL THE PERKS OF BEING A WALLFLOWER BY THE AMERICAN WRITER STEPHEN CHBOSKY

Kukarskaya Olga Valeryevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-5-38-44

Information About Author:

Kukarskaya O. V., Tyumen State University (ul. Volodarskogo, 6, Tyumen, Russian Federation, 625003). E-mail: olga.kukarskaya@mail.ru

Introduction. The study presents an analysis of the novel The Perks of Being a Wallflower, Stephen Chbosky’s attempt at reproducing/imitating the speech of a teenager suffering from an emotional distress. The aim of the article is to unveil major linguistic principles of organizing a posttraumtic discourse. Material and methods. Charlie’s letters to a stranger are approached from a psycholinguistic perspective. The fictional text is viewed as a psychosemantic element, thus not only general psychological symptoms (such as emotional distraction, hyper-arousal, avoiding thoughts of the traumatic event, etc.) are taken into consideration but also its linguistic features. The research is rooted in the idea of the potential of certain figures of speech (for instance, metaphors) to both manifest cognitive processes and hide inner tribulations, either conscious or subconscious. Results and discussion. The research has revealed the following linguistic indicators of PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder): 1) “A strange object” affects the theme and rheme development and is a binding factor for associative chain of thoughts. 2) Compulsive syntactic parallelisms result in a cyclical nature of an utterance. 3) Avoiding thoughts of a traumatic event is achieved through cutting down the sentences, once becoming run-on sentences are finished abruptly by Charlie himself saying he no longer remembers what happened next. 4) The tension of the signified translates to tension in syntactical structures making up the signifier (it can be revealed by means of a growing number of negative sentences in one and the same paragraph; or in a constant use of the conjunction ‘and’ at the beginning of sentences). 5) Almost no metaphors are tracked in Charles’ speech, which might be a sign of predominantly metonymy-based cognitive processes, or other deep mental structures. Conclusion. The analysis of linguistic data at the syntactic, semantic, and structural level of the text makes it possible to identify predictors of PTSD, which can be used in psycholinguistic studies and training sessions on the interpretation of the text.

Keywords: psycholinguistics, posttraumatic discourse, syntax, semantics, structure

References:

1. Rudnev V. P. Proch ot real’nosti: Issledovaniya po fi losofi i teksta [Away from reality: Research into text philosophy]. Moscow, Agraf Publ., 2000, 432 p. (in Russian).

2. Psikhoterapevticheskaya entsiklopediya [Psychotherapeutic encyclopedia]. Ed. by B. D. Karvasarskiy. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2000 (in Russian). URL: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_psychotherapeutic/ (accessed 10 February 2019).

3. Losev A. F. Dialektika mifa [The dialectics of myth]. Mif – Chislo – Sushchnost’ [Myth – Number – Essence]. Мoscow, 1993. P. 74 (in Russian).

4. Zenkov L. R. Bessoznatel’noye i soznatel’noye v aspekte mezhpolusharnogo vzaimodeystviya [Subconscious and conscious in the aspect of hemispherical interaction]. Bessoznatel’noye: priroda, funktsii, metody issledovaniya. T. 4 [Unconscious: nature, functions, research methods. Vol. 4]. Tbilisi, Metsniyereba Publ., 1985. Pp. 224–238 (in Russian).

5. Viko G. Osnovaniya novoy nauki ob obshchey prirode natsii [The new science]. Leningrad, Goslitizdat Publ., 1940. 789 p. (in Russian).

6. Strick M., et al. Finding Comfort in a Joke: Consolatory Effects of Humor through Cognitive Distraction. Emotion, 2009, 9(4), pp. 574–578. doi: 10.1037/a0015951.

7. Mobbs D., Greicius M., Abdel-Azim E., Menon V., Reiss A. Humor Modulates the Mesolimbic Reward Centers. Neuron, 2003, 40(5), рр. 1041–1048.

8. Freud S. Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious. V. 6, gen. ed. Angela Richards, translated from German by James Strachey. London: Cox&Wyman Ltd, 1976. 336 p.

9. Yakobson R. Dva aspekta yazyka i dva tipa afaticheskikh narusheniy [Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disorders]. Teoriya metafory [Theory of metaphor]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. P. 110–132 (in Russian).

10. Smirnov S. N. Lingvisticheskiye interventsii v gumanitarnoy psikhoterapii: gradatsii i oksyumorony [Linguistic interventions in humanitarian psychotherapy: gradation and oxymorons] (in Russian). URL: http://hpsy.ru/public/x3972.htm (accessed 10 February 2019).

11. Sherman J. C. Rambling And Vague Speech Could Be an Early Sign of Mental Decline. Science Alert. URL: https://www.sciencealert.com/rambling-and-vague-speech-could-be-early-signs-of-alzheimer-s-scientists-find (accessed 10 February 2019).

12. Remeslo M. B. Kliniko-lingvisticheskiye kharakteristiki bol’nykh nevrozami i ikh dinamika v protsesse psikhoterapii. Avtoref. dis. kand. med. nauk [Clinical and linguistic characteristics of patients with neuroses and their dynamics in the process of psychotherapy. Abstract of thesis cand. med. sci.]. Saint-Petersburg, 2007. 161 p. (in Russian). URL: http://medical-diss.com/medicina/kliniko-lingvisticheskie-harakteristiki-bolnyh-nevrozamii-ih-dinamika-v-protsesse-psihoterapii#ixzz5eZUSDSCW (accessed 10 February 2019)

13. Cohn D. Transparent Minds: Narrative Models for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton, 1978. 344 p.

14. Beckett S. Not I. SCRIBD. The world’s largest digital library. P. 376–383. URL: https://ru.scribd.com/doc/7317563/Samuel-Beckett-Not-I (accessed 10 February 2019).

15. Ivanov V. V. Zaum’ i teatr absurda u Khlebnikova i oberiutov v svete sovremennoy lingvisticheskoy teorii [Zaum and the theater of the absurd at Khlebnikov and the obariuts in the light of modern linguistic theory]. Mir Velimira Khlebnikova: Stat’i. Issledovaniya (1911–1998) [World of Velimir Khlebnikov: Articles. Research (1911–1998)]. Мoscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 2000. Pp. 263–278 (in Russian).

16. Kharms D. Vek Daniila Kharmsa [Age of Daniil Kharms]. Moscow, Zebra E Publ., 2006. 910 p. (in Russian).

17. Luno J. A., Louwerse M., Beck J. Tell us your story: Investigating the linguistic features of trauma narrative. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society, 2013, vol. 35, pp. 2955–2960 URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/95n9p15n (accessed 10 February 2019).

18. O’Kearney R., Perrott K. Trauma narratives in posttraumatic stress disorder: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2006, vol. 19, issue 1, pp. 81–93 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jts.20099 (accessed 10 February 2019).

19. Crespo M., Fernández-Lansac V. Memory and Narrative of Traumatic Events: A Literature Review. American Psychological Association, 2016, vol. 8, no. 2, 2015, pp. 149–156. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tra0000041 (accessed 10 February 2019).

20. Barnes J. B. Therapeutic Processes in Written Exposure Therapy and Cognitive Processing. PhD dissertation. URL: https://udspace.udel.edu/bitstream/handle/19716/21956/Barnes_udel_0060D_12835.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed 10 February 2019).

21. Chbosky S. The Perks of Being a Wallfl ower. Pocket Books, 1999. 213 p. URL: https://epdf.tips/the-perks-of-being-a-wallfl ower.html (accessed 10 February 2019).

22. Rudnev V. Strannyye ob’’yekty [Strange objects]. Fenomenologiya psikhoticheskogo myshleniya [Phenomenology of psychotic thinking]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2014. 159 p. (in Russian).

kukarskaya_o._v._38_44_5_202_2019.pdf ( 443.38 kB ) kukarskaya_o._v._38_44_5_202_2019.zip ( 436.54 kB )

Issue: 5, 2019

Series of issue: Issue 5

Rubric: CURRENT ISSUES OF LINGUISTICS

Pages: 38 — 44

Downloads: 1936

For citation:


2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU