Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 16.04.2026
Home Issues 2019 Year Issue №9 HAGIOGRAPHICAL TRADITION IN DOSTOYEVSKY’S WORKS (THE STUDY OF “THE LIFE OF THE GREAT SINNER” AND “THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV”): TO THE PROBLEM STATEMENT
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

HAGIOGRAPHICAL TRADITION IN DOSTOYEVSKY’S WORKS (THE STUDY OF “THE LIFE OF THE GREAT SINNER” AND “THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV”): TO THE PROBLEM STATEMENT

Shilova A.S., Koshechko A.N.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2019-9-128-135

Information About Author:

Shilova A. S., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kiyevskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: na4arova.lina@yandex.ru Koshechko A. N., Tomsk State Pedagogical University (ul. Kiyevskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061). E-mail: Nastyk78@mail.ru

Introduction. The hagiographic tradition is explored in “The Life of the Great Sinner” and in the novel “The Brothers Karamazov” by F. M. Dostoevsky. Materials and research methods. The material of the study are the artistic, journalistic and documentary texts of F. M. Dostoevsky. The work uses the cultural-historical, comparative, structural, typological, biographical methods, as well as the method of conceptual analysis. Results and discussion. The focus of researchers is on the implementation of life traditions in the works under study at the level of the structure and ideological plans of the works, for example, the life orientation of the narrator, the system of characters. All available research trajectories are usually directed to work inside artistic texts and demonstrate a receptive literary review of the stated problems, or have an interpretation of Christian motifs and images. Conclusion. A holistic study of hagiographic tradition in the work of F. M. Dostoevsky on the material of the novel “The Brothers Karamazov” and “The Life of the Great Sinner” can be implemented by applying a set of approaches to the study: historical, cultural, biographical. It is also necessary to use the axiological approach in the analysis of the literary texts of the writer, in journalism, ego-documents of Dostoevsky himself, and his close circle. An appropriate structure of the materials under study should be built with the rationale for their involvement. In this direction, the study of the author’s ideology, understanding of the author’s worldview and features of his consciousness, as well as the study of the environment of historical reality and its influence on the writer, which will bring new insights into the problem of studying hagiographic tradition in literary analysis.

Keywords: F. M. Dostoyevsky, novel “The Brothers Karamazov”, “Life of the Great Sinner”, hagiography, life, Orthodoxy, Russian culture, morality, spirituality, values, anti-value

References:

1. Koshechko A. N. Formy ekzistentsial’nogo soznaniya v tvorchestve F. M. Dostoyevskogo. Dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Forms of existential consciousness in the work of F. M. Dostoevsky. Diss. of doct. of philol. sci.]. Tomsk, 2014. 312 p. (in Russian).

2. Likhachev D. S. Izbrannoye: Velikoye naslediye; Zametki o russkom [Favorite: Great Heritage; Notes on Russian]. Saint Petersburg, Logos Publ., 1998. 559 p. (in Russian).

3. Klyuchevskiy V. O. Drevnerusskiye zhitiya svyatykh kak istoricheskiy istochnik [Old Russian lives of saints as a historical source]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989. 512 p. (in Russian).

4. Yakhontov I. V. Zhitiya svyatykh severnorusskikh podvizhnikov pomorskogo kraya kak istoricheskiy istochnik [The lives of the holy north Russian ascetics of the Pomeranian region, as a historical source]. Kazan, 1881. 377 p. (in Russian).

5. Adrianova-Peretts V. P., Eremin I. P. Zhitiya (v russkoy literature XI – nachala XIII veka) [Lives (in Russian literature of the XI – early XIII centuries]. Istoriya russkoy literatury: v 10 t. [History of Russian literature: in 10 volumes]. Moscow – Leningrad, AN SSSR Publ., 1941–1956. Vol. I. Literatura XI – nachala XIII veka [Vol. I. Literature of the XI – beginning of the XIII century]. 1941. Pp. 315–346 (in Russian).

6. Dmitriyev L. A., Likhachev D. S., Lur’ye Ya. S. et al. Istoriya russkoy literatury X–XVII vv.: ucheb. posobiye dlya studentov ped. in-tov po spets. no. 2101 “Russkiy yazyk i literatura”. Pod red. D. S. Likhacheva [History of Russian literature X–XVII centuries: textbook for students of pedagogical institutes in specialty no. 2101 “Russian language and literature”. Ed. D. S. Likhachev]. Moscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1979. 462 p. (in Russian).

7. Eremin I. P. Literatura Drevney Rusi (etyudy i kharakteristiki) [Literature of Ancient Russia (studies and characteristics)]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1966. 266 p. (in Russian).

8. Uzhankov A. N. O problemakh periodizatsii i spetsifi ke razvitiya russkoy literatury XI – pervoy treti XVIII v. [About the problems of periodization and the specifi cs of the development of Russian literature of the XI – fi rst third of the XVIII century]. Kaliningrad, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Publ., 2007. 257 p. (in Russian).

9. Toporov V. N. Svyatost’ i svyatyye v russkoy dukhovnoy kul’ture. Pervyy vek khristianstva na Rusi. T. 1 [Holiness and saints in Russian spiritual culture. The fi rst century of Christianity in Russia. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 1995. 875 p. (in Russian).

10. Grekova I. V. Evolyutsiya agiografi cheskogo zhanra v funktsional’no-stilisticheskom aspekte. Dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [The evolution of the hagiographic genre in the functional-stylistic aspect. Diss. cand.of philol. sci.]. Biysk, 2014. 217 p. (in Russian).

11. Rogozhnikova T. M. Psikholingvisticheskiye problemy funktsionirovaniya polisemantichnogo slova. Avtoref. dis. dokt. fi lol [Psycholinguistic problems of the functioning of the polysemantic word. Abstract of thesis doct. philol. sci.]. Ufa, 2000. 42 p. (in Russian).

12. Berdyayev N. A. Russkaya ideya [Russian idea]. Saint Petersburg, Azbuka-klassika Publ., 2008. 320 p. (in Russian).

13. Nikolayeva E. V. Agiografi cheskiye traditsii v russkoy literature vtoroy poloviny XIX v. Izdatel’skiy Sovet Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi [Hagiographic traditions in Russian literature of the second half of the twentieth centur, Publishing Council of the Russian Orthodox Church] (in Russian). URL: http://theophanica.ru/traditions_in_russian_hagiographic_literature_of_the_second_half_of_xix_century.php (accessed 10 May 2019).

14. Rastyagayev A. V. Agiografi cheskaya traditsiya v russkoy literature XVIII v.: problema genezisa i zhanrovoy transformatsii [Hagiographic tradition in Russian literature of the XVII century: the problem of genesis and genre transformation]. Samara 2007. 410 p. (in Russian).

15. Mochul’skiy K. V. Dostoyevskiy: zhizn’ i tvorchestvo [Dostoevsky: life and work]. Paris, YMCA-Press Publ., 1980. 561 p. (in Russian).

16. Tikhomirov B. N. Zhitiye velikogo greshnika [The life of the great sinner]. Dostoevskiy: sochineniya, pis’ma, dokumenty: slovar’-spravochnik [Dostoevsky: essays, letters, documents: dictionary-reference book]. Saint Petersburg, 2008. Pp. 291–298 (in Russian).

17. Natarzan E. V. Zhitiyye motivy v tvorchestve Dostoyevskogo. Dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [Life motives in the work of Dostoevsky. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Novosibirsk, 2000. 190 p. (in Russian).

18. Saychenko V. V. “Zhitiye Velikogo greshnika” – transformatsiya zamysla, zhanrovoye svoyeobraziye, rol’ v tvorcheskoy evolyutsii F. M. Dostoyevskogo. Dis. kand. fi lol. nauk [“The Life of the Great Sinner ”– the transformation of design, genre identity, role in the creative evolution of F. M. Dostoevsky. Diss. cand. philol. sci.]. Krasnodar, 2002. 223 p. (in Russian).

19. Lantsov A. “Budut vse kak deti bozhii…”: traditsii zhitiynoy literatury v romane F. M. Dostoyevskogo “Brat’ya Karamazovy” [“There will be everything like God’s children...”: traditions of everyday literature in the novel by F. M. Dostoevsky “The Brothers Karamazov”]. Saint Petersburg, Aleteyya Publ., 2012. 64 p. (in Russian).

20. Vetlovskaya V. E. Poetika “Brat’yev Karamazovykh” [Poetics of “The Brothers Karamazov”]. Leningrad, 1972. 198 p. (in Russian).

21. Kuskov V. V. Motivy drevnerusskoy literatury v romane F. M. Dostoyevskogo “Brat’ya Karamazovy” [Motives of Old Russian Literature in the novel by F. M. Dostoevsky “The Brothers Karamazov”]. Vestnik MGU. Seriya 10: Filologiya – Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 10. Philology, 1974, vol. 5, pp. 22–28 (in Russian).

22. Ponomareva G. B. “Zhitiye velikogo greshnika” Dostoyevskogo (struktura i zhanr) [“The Life of the Great Sinner” by Dostoevsky (structure and genre)]. Issledovaniya po poetike i stilistike [Studies on poetics and stylistics]. Leningrad, Institute of Russian Literature Publ., 1972. Pp. 66–86 (in Russian).

23. Roman F. M. Dostoyevskogo “Brat’ya Karamazovy”: sovremennoye sostoyaniye izucheniya. Pod. red. T. A. Kasatkinoy [Rthe novel by F. M. Dostoevsky “The Brothers Karamazov”: the current state of study. Ed. T. A. Kasatkina]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2007. 835 p. (in Russian).

24. Isupov K. G. Metafi zika Dostoyevskogo [Metaphysics of Dostoevsky]. Saint Petersburg, Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ Publ., 2016. 208 p. (in Russian).

25. Iustin (Popovich), prepodobnyy. Filosofi ya i religiya F. M. Dostoyevskogo [Philosophy and religion of F. M. Dostoevsky]. Minsk, Izdatel’ D. V. Kharchenko Publ., 2007. 312 p. (in Russian).

26. Volkova E. A. Religioznyye i istoricheskiye vozzreniya F. M. Dostoyevskogo [Religious and historical views of F. M. Dostoevsky]. Voronezh, VG Publ., 2017. 330 p. (in Russian).

27. Syromyatnikov O. I. Poetika russkoy idei v “Velikom Pyatiknizhii” F. M. Dostoyevskogo [Poetics of the Russian idea in the “Great Pentateuch” F. M. Dostoevsky]. Saint Petersurg, Mamatov Publ., 2014. 368 p. (in Russian).

28. Dorofeyeva L. G. Problema izucheniya russkoy agiografi i [Problems of studying Russian hagiography]. Slovo.ru: baltiyskiy aktsent – Slovo.ru: Baltic Accent, 2017, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 11–23 (in Russian).

29. Lepakhin V. V. Ikonichnaya agiografi ya [Iconic hagiography]. Obrazovatel’nyy portal “Slovo” [Educational portal “Word”]. (in Russian). URL: https://www.portal-slovo.ru/art/35902.php (accessed 10 May 2019).

30. Uzhankov A. N. O spetsifi ke razvitiya russkoy literatury XI – pervoy treti XVIII veka: stadii i formatsii [On the specifi cs of the development of Russian literature of the XVIII – the fi rst third of the XVII century: stages and formations]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2009. 264 p.(in Russian).

31. Losskiy N. O. Dostoyevskiy i yego khristianskoye miroponimaniye [Dostoevsky and his Christian outlook]. New York, Izd-vo im. Chekhova Publ., 1953. 406 p. (in Russian).

32. Koshechko A. N. Ekzistentsial’naya sud’ba F. M. Dostoyevskogo: sposoby otrazheniya v slove. Pod red. dokt. fi lol. nauk, prof. A. S. Yanushkevicha [The existential fate of F. M. Dostoevsky: the ways of refl ection in a word. Ed. doctor of philology, prof. A. S. Yanushkevich]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2014. 160 p. (in Russian).

33. Koshechko A. N. Dostoyevskiy i apostasiya: k vosprosu ob atributivnykh kharakteristikakh ekzistentsial’nogo soznaniya [Dostoevsky and apostasy: the problem of attributive characteristics of the existential consciousness]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, vol. 11 (139), pp. 23–31 (in Russian).

34. Koshechko A. N. “Mir s Bogom” i “mir bez Boga”: religioznyy i ateisticheskiy tipy dukhovnosti v ekzistentsial’noy aksiologii romana F. M. Dostoyevskogo “Besy” [“Peace with God” and “Peace without God”: religious and atheistic types of spirituality in the existential axiology of the novel by F. M. Dostoevsky “Demons”]. Sibirskiy fi lologicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Journal of Philology, 2014, no. 3, pp. 94–104 (in Russian).

shilova_a._s._128_135_9_206_2019.pdf ( 448.99 kB ) shilova_a._s._128_135_9_206_2019.zip ( 442.03 kB )

Issue: 9, 2019

Series of issue: Issue 9

Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF LITERARY STUDIES

Pages: 128 — 135

Downloads: 2007

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU