LEARNING TASK IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT OF PERSONALITY-ORIENTED EDUCATION
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-1-94-103
Introduction. Taking into account the updating goals and methods of modern education, the relevance of revealing the potential of the digital environment for the implementation of personality-oriented learning is justified. The search for effective methods of pedagogical support of an individualized student’s work in new information conditions is substantiated. Material and methods. The implementation of the objective approach to the organization of students’ independent work in a digital environment is proposed and methodologically justified. As a prerequisite is considered the “culturecongruent” of this approach, i.e. compliance with the level of modern information culture and the educational results demanded by society. The key features of the learning task in the digital space are identified in terms of goal setting, content management, the development of digital tools, interaction with other subjects, taking into account the individual student’s needs and requests, manifested in their information behavior. The concept of “digital microenvironment of the learning task” is introduced and disclosed, embodying the specifics of setting educational tasks and creating situations for their solution in the digital education space. Results and discussion. The results of surveys of university students and teachers are presented and analyzed, which made it possible to identify the real features of pedagogical activity in the digital education space and correlate them with the students’ attitude to the use of various methods of interaction with resources and persons in the digital educational environment. The data confirmed that the majority of teachers do not fully realize the potential of the digital educational environment in the context of modern education priorities and are not sufficiently oriented to students’ information and communication requests. Conclusion. The learning task is considered as a unit, according to which an independent learning and cognitive activity is organized in the digital environment. The design of the “learning tasks of digital microenvironments” provides a wide range of opportunities for organizing a productive, personality-oriented independent student work. The nature of the educational activity in the “digital microenvironment” depends both on the pedagogical methodology and on the educational position and characteristics of the student’s informational behavior.
Keywords: digital educational environment, personality-oriented learning, learning task, independent work
References:
1. Osnovnye napravleniya deyatel’nosti Pravitel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2024 goda [The main activities of the Russian Federation Government for the period until 2024] (in Russian). URL: http://government.ru/news/34168/ (accessed 16 July 2019).
2. Tseli v oblasti ustoychivogo razvitiya do 2030 goda. Kachestvennoye obrazovaniye [Sustainable development goals until 2030. Quality education] (in Russian). URL: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ru/education/ (accessed 16 July 2019).
3. Navyki budushchego. Chto nuzhno znat’ i umet’ v novom slozhnom mire [Skills of the future. What you need to know and be able to in a new complex world] (in Russian). URL: http://spkurdyumov.ru/uploads/2017/10/navyki-budushhego-chto-nuzhno-znat-i-umet-v-novom-slozhnom-mire.pdf (accessed 16 July 2019).
4. Yakimanskaya I. S. Lichnostno oriyentirovannaya shkola: kriterii i protsedury analiza i otsenki eye deyatel’nosti [Personally oriented school: criteria and procedures for the analysis and evaluation of its activities]. Direktor shkoly, 2003, no. 6, pp. 27–36 (in Russian).
5. Serikov V. V. Razvitiye lichnosti v obrazovatel’nom protsesse [Personality development in the educational process]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2012. 447 p. (in Russian).
6. Semple A. (2000). Learning theories and their influence on the development and use of educational technologies. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 2000, vol. 46 (3), pp. 21–28.
7. Tekkol İlkay Aşkin, Melek Demirel. An Investigation of Self-Directed Learning Skills of Undergraduate Students. Frontiers in psychology, 2018, vol. 9 2324. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02324. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02324/full (accessed 16 July 2019)
8. Ostapenko A. V., Plekhova Yu. O. Sovershenstvovaniye organizatsii samostoyatel’noy raboty studentov kak put’ povysheniya kachestva yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya [Improving the organization of students’ independent work as a way to improve the quality of legal education]. Pedagogika. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Pedagogy. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2018, no. 4, pp. 12–15 (in Russian).
9. Pak Yu. N., Nuguzhinov Zh. S., Pak D. Yu. Problemy modernizatsii vysshey shkoly v formate kompetentnostnogo podkhoda [Problems of modernization of higher education in the format of competency-based approach]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye segodnya – Higher Education Today, 2017, no. 10, pp. 48–52 (in Russian).
10. Serikov V. V. Didaktika Lernera: idei i ikh razvitiye [Lerner didactics: ideas and their development]. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika, 2017, no. 3 (39), pp. 19–30 (in Russian).
11. Kompetentnostnyy podkhod v pedagogicheskom obrazovanii. Pod red. V. A. Kozyreva i N. F. Radionovoy [Competency-based approach in teacher education. Ed. V. A. Kozyreva and N. F. Radionova]. Saint Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia Publ., 2004. 392 p. (in Russian).
12. Sergeeva I. L. Transformatsiya massovoy kul’tury v tsifrovoy srede [The transformation of mass culture in the digital environment]. Kul’tura i tsivilizatsiya – Culture and Civilization, 2016, vol. 6, no. 6A, pp. 55–65 (in Russian).
13. Noskova T. N. Psikhodidaktika informatsionno-obrazovatel’noy sredy: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy, obuchayushchikhsya po napravleniyam pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya [Psychodidactics of the information and educational environment: a textbook for students of higher educational institutions studying in the areas of teacher education]. Saint Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia Publ., 2007. 171 p. (in Russian).
14. Leontiev A. N. Deyatel’nost’. Soznaniye. Lichnost’: uchebnoye posobiye [Activity. Consciousness. Personality: study guide]. Moscow, Smysl, Akademiya Publ., 2004. 352 p. (in Russian).
15. Ball G. A. Teoriya uchebnykh zadach: Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiy aspekt [Theory of educational problems: Psychological and pedagogical aspect]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1990. 352 p. (in Russian).
16. Noskova T. N., Pavlova T. B., Yakovleva O. V. Instrumenty pedagogicheskoy deyatel’nosti v elektronnoy srede [Instruments of pedagogical activity in the electronic environment]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 8-9, pp. 121–130 (in Russian).
17. Davydov V. V. Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [Theory of Developmental Learning]. Moscow, Intor Publ., 1996. 544 p. (in Russian).
18. Setevaya obrazovatel’naya sreda, elektronnye resursy: uchebnoye posobiye. Pod red. T. N. Noskovoy [Network educational environment, electronic resources: a training manual. Ed. T. N. Noskova]. Saint Petersburg, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia Publ., 2015. 352 p. (in Russian).
( 780.31 kB ) 
( 769.62 kB )
Issue: 1, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: HIGHER EDUCATION
Pages: 94 — 103
Downloads: 1603