COMMUNICATIVE STYLISTICS OF TEXT: NOTIONAL EXPLICATION OF POETIC TEXT AND ITS INTERPRETATION
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-4-174-182
Introduction. Text interpretation problem is one of the most topical in up-to-date philology generally and in stylistics of text in particular. In this way the research of readers’ interpretative activity on the basis of experiments is of special interest, because it allows to judge steps of notional text explication in the addressee’s consciousness. The purpose of the article is to identify some patterns that are important for the interpretation activity of the collective addressee (reader) based on the methods of communicative stylistics of the text and its notional explication theory, developed in the context of this trend. Material and methods. Under the methodological base of communicative stylistics of text context and semanticstylistic analysis, a method of associative field of a key word’s modelling and experimental methodology are used in the article. It includes spare associative experiment as well as receptive experiment and modified methods of scaling by Ch. Osgud for detecting power of influence on collective addressee. Results and discussion. The research is done on the basis of experimental data on the reader’s perception of a verse “Light rain is tender, thin and delicate…” by O. E. Mandel’shtam with the use of the semantic explication theory, which is developed in the communicative stylistics of text, that realizes communicative and activity approach to the text. The theory of semantic explication of a text includes its lexical structure research, detecting of text notional paradigms of different types, their correlation, regulative means and structures analysis, textual associative field of a key word analysis versus associative field of this word, which is revealed during a spare associative experiment. Dependence of semantic explication of poetic text on its lexical structure of deductive type and author’s regulative means and structures, atributives as regulative text dominants and contrast as the main regulative method is determined in the article. Connection of interpretative readers activity (informants) with linguistic and extralinguistic aspects of pragmatic text level and its sublevels (figurative, emotional, ideal) is revealed on the basis of experimental methods. Experimental data verified the connection of the pragmatic level of the text with its informative and notional level. The factors that influence the relevant reading activities are identified. These factors are the following: author’s support to standard associations, which are stimulated by a key word, the role of lexical regulation in controlling of cognitive addressee’s of poetic text activity for revealing its deep sense. Conclusion. The introduced approach of researching interpretative readers’ of poetic text activity on the basis of its notional explication showed that the use of experimental methods with informants’ questioning makes it possible to judge about some regularities and steps of text’s and its elements’ influence on forming of common estimation and idea about text content, that readers have: the role of their informational thesaurus, ability to perceive not only deep, but also superficial sense. Dependence of a process of poetic text perception on its peculiarities – common regulative author’s strategy (explicit and implicit) and regulative means and structures and way of regulation – is detected.
Keywords: communicative stylistics, theory of notional text explication, poetic text, interpretation, lexical regulativity, experiment
References:
1. Dem’yankov V. Z. Kognitivnaya lingvistika kak raznovidnost’ interpretiruyushchego podkhoda [Cognitive linguistics as variety of interpretative approach]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya – Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language), 1994, no. 4, pp. 17–33 (in Russian).
2. Dem’yankov V. Z. Interpretatsiya [Interpretation]. In: Kubryakova E. S. (ed.), Dem’yankov V. Z., Pankrats Yu. G., Luzina L. G. Kratkiy slovar’ kognitivnykh terminov [Abridged dictionary of cognitive terms]. Мoscow, 1996. Pp. 31–33 (in Russian).
3. Vasil’yeva V. V. Interpretatsiya kak vzaimodeystviye cheloveka i teksta [Interpretation as cooperation of an individual and text]. In: Tekst: stereotip i tvorchestvo [Text: stereotype and creation]. Perm, 1998. Pp. 196–214 (in Russian).
4. Zalevskaya A. A. Spetsifika integrativnogo podkhoda k ponimaniyu teksta [Specificity of integrative approach to text underatanding]. In: Yazykovoye bytiye cheloveka i etnosa. Vyp. 6 [The linguistic being of man and ethnos. Issue 6]. Moscow, Barnaul, 2003. Pp. 93–101 (in Russian).
5. Boldyrev N. N. Problems of verbal communication in cognitive aspect. Questions of cognitive linguistics, 2017, no. 2, pp. 5–14.
6. Brudnyy A. A. K analizu protsessa ponimaniya tekstov [To analysis of process of text understanding]. In: Znak i obshchestvo [Sign and society]. Frunze, 1974. Pp. 3–6 (in Russian).
7. Brudnyy A. A. K probleme ponimaniya teksta [To the problem of text understanding]. In: Issledovaniye rechemyslitel’noy deyatel’nosti [The study of speech activity.] Alma-Ata, 1974, P. 80–86 (in Russian).
8. Zimnyaya I. A. Psikhologicheskaya skhema smyslovogo vospriyatiya [The psychological scheme of semantic perception]. In: Smyslovoye vospriyatiye rechevogo soobshcheniya (v usloviyakh massovoy kommunikatsii) [The semantic perception of speech communication (in conditions of mass communication)]. Мoscow, 1976. Pp. 5–33 (in Russian).
9. Kamenskaya O. L. Tekst i kommunikatsiya [Text and communication]. Moscow, 1992. 152 p. (in Russian).
10. Bolotnova N. S., Babenko I. I., Vasil’eva A. A. et al. Kommunikativnaya stilistika khudozhestvennogo teksta: leksicheskaya struktura i idiostil’ [Communicative stylistics of feature text: lexical structure and idiostyle]. Tomsk, 2001. 331 p. (in Russian).
11. Bolotnova N. S. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: slovar’-tezaurus [Communicative stylistics of text: thesaurus]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2009. 384 p. (in Russian).
12. Bolotnova N. S., Vasil’eva A. A. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: bibliograficheskiy slovar’ po nauchnomu napravleniyu [Communicative stylistics of text: bibliographic dictionary in scientific trend]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2009. 188 p. (in Russian).
13. Bolotnova N. S., Babenko I. I., Baklanova E.A. et al. Kommunikativnaya stilistika teksta: leksicheskaya regulyativnost’ v tekstovoy deyatel’nosti [Communicative stylistics of text: lexical regulativity in textual activity]. Ed. N. S. Bolotnova. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 2011. 492 p. (in Russian).
14. Vygotskiy L. S. Myshleniye i rech’ [Mentality and speech]. Moscow, 1996. 415 p. (in Russian).
15. Sidorov E. V. Problemy rechevoy sistemnosti [Speech system problems]. Moscow, 1987. 140 p. (in Russian).
16. Bolotnova N. S. Khudozhestvennyy tekst v kommunikativnom aspekte i kompleksnyy analiz edinits leksicheskogo urovnya [Fiction text in communicative aspect and complex analysis of lexical units]. Tomsk, TSU Publ., 1992. 312 p. (in Russian).
17. Bolotnova N. S. Leksicheskaya struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta v assotsiativnom aspekte [Lexical structure of fiction text in associative aspect]. Tomsk, Tomsk TSPU Publ., 1994. 212 p. (in Russian).
18. Pushkareva I. A. Smyslovye leksicheskiye paradigmy v lirike M. I. Tsvetayevoy. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Notional lexical paradigms in lyrics by M. I. Cvetaeva. Abstract of a thesis of cand. philol. sci.]. Tomsk, 1999. 22 p. (in Russian).
19. Karaulov Yu. N., Cherkasova G. A., Ufimtseva N. V. et al. Russkiy assotsiativnyy slovar’: v 2 t. T. 1. Ot stimula k reaktsii [Russian associative dictionary: in 2 vol. Vol. 1. From stimulus to reaction]. Moscow, 2002. 784 p. (in Russian).
( 434.37 kB ) 
( 427.81 kB )
Issue: 4, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: TOPICAL ISSUES OF RUSSIAN STUDIES AND COMMUNICATIVE STYLE OF TEXT
Pages: 174 — 182
Downloads: 1805