Axiological Dominant “Family”: the Specifics of Representation in Linguodidactic Discourse (Based on Textbooks on Russian as a Foreign Language)
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2023-1-32-40
The purpose of the article is to analyze the specifics of the representation of the family value dominants existing in Russian culture, presented in the textbooks on Russian as a foreign language by Russian and foreign authors. The material of the study are textbooks on Russian as a foreign language by Russian, Chinese and English-speaking authors written in the period from 2007–2018, with a total volume of more than 3,100 pages. We selected dialogues and narrative texts related to the topic of “family” from these materials using a continuous sampling method, allowing to analyze axiological dominants and linguistic means of their expression in various family aspects. The analysis of the obtained data was carried out using the methods of contextual analysis, lexical and semantic as well as comparative analysis. Family is one of the main value dominants for the Russian people. In textbooks on Russian as a foreign language, Russian authors mainly use positive value judgments, neutral or negative value judgments are used rarely. Chinese authors of the textbooks on the Russian language broadcast mainly a positive assessment of the family institute. English-speaking authors prefer neutral connotations. Individual parameters are also evaluated in different ways. In relationship between spouses, Russian authors often promote husband’s authority. Considering family responsibilities, household management is assigned exclusively to a woman, while work is typical for both men and women. Foreign authors mainly present in their textbooks a model of joint household management; husband’s authority in their works is not mentioned. Children are the dominant value in most cultures, however, it was found that when referring to children, Chinese authors use exclusively neutral vocabulary, while Russian and English-speaking authors prefer emotional expressions (mostly positive, less often negative). When describing the relationship to older relatives (especially grandmothers), Russian authors use value judgments that are of an exceptionally positive nature. In contrast, Chinese authors use a neutral assessment of grandparents. English-speaking authors in their works do not describe the relationships between children and grandparents. Among Russian and foreign authors there is also a variability in the specifics of describing the relationship between parents and their children. Unlike English-speaking authors, who do not focus on the mutual relationship of children and parents and use mostly neutral vocabulary when describing this value category, Russian and Chinese authors emphasize respect for parents and mutual concern. The analysis showed, that despite the general ideas about good and approved that exist in different cultures, the authors of the textbooks on the Russian language implicitly represent the value orientations inherent in their culture. The specificity is determined not only by the differences in the choice of certain lexical groups, but also in the subconscious emphasis on values that are significant for the culture of the authors of the materials.
Keywords: Russian as a foreign language, linguodidactic manual, family, axiological dominant, linguoculturological aspect
References:
1. Gumboldt Von W. Izbrannyye trudy po yazykoznaniyu [Selected works on linguistics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1984. 400 p. (in Russian).
2. Leontovich O. A. Vvedeniye v mezhkul’turnuyu kommunikatsiyu [Introduction to crosscultural communication]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2007. 366 p. (in Russian).
3. Miloslavskaya S. K. Russkiy yazyk kak inostrannyy v istorii stanovleniya evropeyskogo obraza Rossii [Russian as a foreign language in the history of the formation of the European image of Russia]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2012. 400 p. (in Russian).
4. Ter-Minasova S. G. Yazyk i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov, aspirantov i soiskateley po spetsial’nosti “lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya” [Language and crosscultural communication: a study guide for students, postgraduates and degree seeking applicants for the specialty “linguistics and crosscultural communication”]. Moscow, Slovo Publ., 2000. 261 p. (in Russian).
5. Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the Human World]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1999. 896 p. (in Russian).
6. Vorkachev S. G. Lingvokul’turologiya, yazykovaya lichnost’, kontsept: stanovleniye antropotsentricheskoy paradigmy v yazikoznanii [Linguoculturology, linguistic personality, concept: the formation of an anthropocentric paradigm in linguistics]. Filologicheskiye Nauki, 2001, no. 1, pp. 64–72 (in Russian).
7. Vezhbitskaya A. Ponimaniye kul’tur cherez posredstvo klyuchevykh slov [Understanding cultures through keywords]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ., 2001. 288 p. (in Russian).
8. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’ kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2002. 477 p. (in Russian).
9. Gural’ S. K. Mirovozzreniye, kartina mira, yazyk: lingvisticheskiy aspekt sootnosheniya [Worldview, world picture, language: linguistic aspect of correlation]. Yazyk i kul’tura – Language and Culture, 2008, no. 4, pp. 14–21 (in Russian).
10. Vereshchyagin E. M., Kostomarov V. G. Lingvostranovedcheskaya teoriya slova [Linguistic and cultural theory of the word]. Moscow, Russkiy yazyk Publ., 1980. 320 p. (in Russian).
11. Ukhtomskiy A. A. Dominanta [A Dominant]. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2002. 448 p. (in Russian).
12. Vikent’yev I. L. Printsip dominanty Ukhtomskogo [Ukhtomskiy’s dominant principle]. TRIZ, 1991, no. 2.2, pp. 18–23 (in Russian).
13. Gritsanov A. A. Noveyshiy filosofskiy slovar’ [The newest philosophy dictionary]. Minsk, V. M. Skakoun Publ., 1998. 896 p. (in Russian).
14. Basko N. V. Znakomim’sya s russkimi traditsiyami i zhizn’yu rossiyan. Uchebnoye posobiye po kul’turologii, razvitiyu rechi i chteniyu dlya izuchayushchikh russkiy yazyk kak inostrannyy [Let us meet Russian traditions and life of the Russians. A textbook on cultural studies, speech development and reading for students of Russian as a foreign language]. Moscow, Rus. yaz. kursy Publ., 2007. 232 p. (in Russian).
15. Tolkoviy slovar’ russkikh glagolov: Ideographicheskoye opisaniye. Angliyskiye ekvivalenty. Sinonimy. Antonimy [Explanatory Dictionary of Russian verbs: Ideograhic description. English equivalents. Synonyms. Antonyms]. Ed. Prof. L. G. Babenko. Moscow, AST-PRESS Publ., 1999. 707 p. (in Russian).
16. Chekulay I. V., Prokhorova O. N. Stabil’nost’ kak kategorial’naya oblast’ aksiologicheskoy storony lingvisticheskoy semantiki [Stability as a categorical domain of the axiological side of linguistic semantics]. Yazyk: mul’tidistsiplinarnost’ nauchnogo znaniya: nauchnyy al’manakh Altayskoy gosudarstvennoy pedagogicheskoy akademii, 2013, no. 3, pp. 52–58 (in Russian).
( 1.04 MB ) 
( 980.02 kB )
Issue: 1, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: THEORETICAL AND APPLIED LINGUISTICS
Pages: 32 — 40
Downloads: 565