Educational independence in the context of pedagogy of joint activity
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2023-2-7-15
Despite the requirements of the updated FSES LEO and FSES OOO, which point out formation of the ability to learn as the most important educational result, teachers of secondary schools have difficulties in developing such universal competence as learning independence. The problem of analyzing the different quality of educational independence and different ways of its formation is posed. The aim and objectives are to analyze the formation of the student’s educational independence in the context of the concept of pedagogy of joint activity and to substantiate the idea that its quality may be different depending on what positions the participants in joint activity occupy. Methods of theoretical analysis: the study of the history of the issue, analysis of modern challenges of the development of educational independence, pedagogy of joint activity. Learning independence is considered in the context of the pedagogy of joint activities (G. N. Prozumentova), different models and types of joint activities are analyzed, as well as different methods for the formation of independent learning. As a result of the analysis, various qualities of independence and its different types are distinguished: educationalfunctional, educational-cognitive, educational. Different types of independence of a student are associated with different positions that he occupies in educational activities (performer, co-executor, partner), as well as different types of actions carried out without the help of an adult (reproductive, constructive, creative). In addition, the different nature of independence, which is formed in the process of school education, affects the subject’s acquisition of different experiences: educational (experience of solving typical educational tasks), cognitive (experience of selfrealization of the action of cognition and discovery of a new one), educational (experience of setting and solving actual personal tasks in the field of education). It is concluded that the teacher consistently forms these different types of independence, thanks to which the student masters various ways of organizing amateur activity (reproductive, partially exploratory, personal) and leads to the development of agency as a person’s ability to act as an actor.
Keywords: uncertainty, amateur activity, joint activity of a teacher and children, models of joint activity, teaching methods, involvement, different quality of independence
References:
1. Krekhan L. Umnyye zemli. Sekrety uspekha obrazovatel’nykh sverkhderzhav. Perevod s angliyskogo yazyka Yu. Kapturevskogo; pod nauchnoy redaktsiyey A. Ryabova [Smart lands. Secrets of success of educational Superpowers. Translated from English by Yu. Kaptyrevskiy, under the scientific editorship of A. Ryabov]. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics Publ., 2020. 368 р. (in Russian).
2. Hattie John A. S. Vidimoye obucheniye: sintez rezul’tatov bolee 50 000 issledovaniy s okhvatom bolee 86 millionov shkol’nikov. Red. V. K. Zagvozdkin, E. A. Khamraeva. Perevodchik N. V. Selivanova [Visible learning. Synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement]. Edited by V. K. Zagvozdkin and E. A. Khamraeva. Translated by N. V. Selivanova. Moscow, Natsional’noye obrazovaniye Publ., 2017. 496 p. (in Russian).
3. Prozumentova G. N. Shkola sovmestnoy deyatelnosti. Eksperiment: razvitiye tseli vospitaniya i issledovatel’skoy deyatelnosti pedagogov shkoly [School of joint activities: Experiment: the development objectives of education and research activities of the teachers of the school]. Tomsk, 1994. 41 p. (in Russian).
4. Kapterev P. F. Izbrannyye pedagogicheskiye sochineniya. Pod red. A. M. Arsen’yeva [Selected pedagogical essays. Ed. A. M. Arsenyeva]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1982. 704 p. (in Russian).
5. Vakhterov V. P. Izbrannyye pedagogicheskiye sochineniya. Sostaviteli L. N. Litvin, N. T. Britaeva [Selected pedagogical essays. Compilers L. N. Litvin, N. T. Britaeva]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1987. 400 p. (in Russian).
6. Obshchestvo znaniyevykh kochevnikov. Pod redaktsiyey Dzhona U. Moravetsa; perevod s angliyskogo S. S. Nosovoy; nauchnyy redaktor, perevod I. P. Kuzheleva-Sagan [The Society of Knowledge Nomads. Edited by John W. Moravec; translation from English by S. S. Nosova; scientific editor translator I. P. Kuzheleva-Sagan]. Tomsk, TSU Publishing House Publ., 2018. 346 p. (in Russian).
7. Prozumentova G. N. Massovaya obshcheobrazovatel’naya shkola: vozmozhnosti razvitiya lichnosti [Mass secondary school: opportunities for personal development]. Psikhologicheskiy universum obrazovaniya cheloveka noeticheskogo: sbornik statey [Mass secondary school: opportunities for personal development: collection of articles]. Tomsk, Vodoley Publ., 1999. Pp. 162–173 (in Russian).
8. Prozumentova G. N. Pervyy shag: ot avtoritarizma – k avtorstvu [The first step: from authoritarianism to authorship]. Shkola sovmestnoy deyatel’nosti. Kn. 4. Obrazovatel’naya programma dlya pedagogov “Pedagog – uchastnik i organizator sovmestnoy deyatel’nosti”. Pod red. G. N. Prozumentovoy [School of joint activities. Book. 4. Educational program for teachers “Teacher – participant and organizer of joint activities”. Ed. G. N. Prozumentova]. Tomsk, Publishing house of TSPU Publ., 2001. Pp. 15–24 (in Russian).
9. Asmolov A. G. Strategiya sotsiokul’turnoy modernizatsii obrazovaniya kak instituta sotsializatsii [Strategy of socio-cultural modernization of education as an institution of socialization]. Razvitiye lichnosti – Personality development, 2009, no. 1, pp. 39–63 (in Russian).
10. Asmolov A. G., Gusel’tseva M. S. Obrazovaniye kak potentsial’nyy resurs modernizatsii obshchestva [Education as a potential resource of modernization of society]. Obrazovatel’naya politika – Educational policy, 2016, no. 2 (72) (in Russian).
11. Pozdeeva S. I. Metodicheskaya deyatel’nost’ prepodavatelya kak soorganizatsiya raznykh modeley, sposobov i sredstv [Methodical activity of a teacher as a co-organization of different models, methods and means]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2020, vol. 1 (207), pр. 56–60 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-1-56-60
12. Pozdeeva S. I. Prepodavatel’ vysshey shkoly: metodist, issledovatel’, novator? [High school teacher: methodologist, researcher, innovator?]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher education in Russia, 2017, no. 3, рр. 52–58 (in Russian).
13. Shtern O. V., Pozdeeva S. I. Designing effective collaborative work between primary school students with various educational needs: the case of a Russian school. IEEHGIP 2022. LNNS, vol. 131, pp. 28–38. Springer, Cham (2020). URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47415-7_4
14. Lebedeva K. S. Stanovleniye obrazovatel’noy samostoyatel’nosti obuchayushchikhsya. Avtoref. dis. kand. ped. nauk [Formation of educational independence of students. Abstract of thesis cand. ped. sci.]. Barnaul, 2020. 24 p. (in Russian).
15. Prosumentova G. N. Obrazovatel’nyye innovatsii: fenomen “lichnogo prisutstviya” i potentsial upravleniya (opyt gumanitarnogo upravleniya) [Educational innovation: the phenomenon of “personal presence” and capacity management (the experience of humanitarian research)]. Tomsk, Publishing house of Tomsk University Publ., 2016. 412 p. (in Russian).
( 423.06 kB ) 
( 415.04 kB )
Issue: 2, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: GENERAL AND INCLUSIVE EDUCATION
Pages: 7 — 15
Downloads: 1201