Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 08.12.2025
Home Issues 2023 Year Issue №3 Linguistic representation of heterostereotypes in Japanese pedagogical discourse (based on the Japanese language textbooks for foreigners)
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Linguistic representation of heterostereotypes in Japanese pedagogical discourse (based on the Japanese language textbooks for foreigners)

Kozachina Anna Vladimirovna, Bazayeva Yuliya Aleksandrovna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2023-3-40-47

Information About Author:

Kozachina A. V., Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Siberian Federal University (pr. Svobodnyy, 79, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660041). Bazaeva Y. A., undergraduate student, Siberian Federal University (pr. Svobodny, 79, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660041).

In the 20th century, the phenomenon of stereotype started to attract wide scientific attention in the field of humanities, due to the occurred awareness of the influence of socio-cultural context on an individual. Nowadays we can see a growing interest in the research of stereotyping in pedagogical discourse, because while being seemingly unbiased, pedagogical discourse is subject to ideological influence and involves perception of information that inevitably transmits ethnic and cultural stereotypes and prejudices. That fact forms the necessity of detecting and researching the ideological content in written foreign language learning materials. The aim is to describe various ways in which heterostereotypes are verbalized in Japanese language textbooks for foreigners. The research is based on Japanese language textbooks for foreigners of elementary and intermediate level of proficiency. The major methods used are qualitative-quantitative, contextual and discourse analysis as well as some elements of linguocultural analysis. In the content of the analyzed textbooks we see the elements of stereotypical image of a foreigner represented by various linguistic means. On the vocabulary level, there are multiple positive characteristics of appearance, personality traits and Japanese language skills of the foreign characters residing in Japan. At the same time, grammatical structures, the existence of presupposition in some sentences, and the thematic selection of narratives often emphasize the insufficient level of integration of the foreign characters into Japanese society through the presumption of their temporary status in Japan. In addition, foreigners, especially Western culture bearers, are often shown making communicative mistakes, violating Japanese etiquette rules and causing trouble for Japanese characters. The analysis demonstrates main stereotypical features of the image of a foreigner in Japanese textbooks and the ways of their linguistic representation. Established patterns reveal the contradiction between the intentional transmission of the message of Japan’s openness towards foreigners and the perception of a foreigner as a member of the “out-group” that is deeply rooted in Japanese culture.

Keywords: stereotype, heterostereotype, linguoculturology, Japanese language, pedagogical discourse, Japanese language textbooks

References:

1. Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Essex: Longman Group Limited. 1995. 265 p.

2. Gilbert W., Wodak R. Critical discourse analysis: theory and interdisciplinarity. Hampshire; N.Y.: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 2003. 321 p.

3. Dijk T. A. Discourse and power. London: Palgrave, 2008. 320 p. (Russ ed.: Deyk T. A. Diskurs i vlast’. Reprezentatsiya dominirovaniya v yazyke i kommunikatsii. Moscow, LIBROKOM Publ., 2013. 342 p.).

4. Bernstein B. Class, Codes and Control: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. N.Y.: Routledge, 2003. 204 p.

5. Kubota R., Lin A. Race, Culture, and Identities in Second Language Education: Exploring Critically Engaged Practice. N.Y.: Routledge, 2009. 322 p.

6. Leeuwen T. Discourse and Practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 184 p.

7. Kozhemyakin E. A. Obrazovatel’no-pedagogicheskiy diskurs [Educational and pedagogical discourse]. Sovremennyy diskursanaliz: tipy diskursov: teoreticheskiye opisaniya – Modern discourse analysis: types of discourses: theoretical descriptions, 2010, no. 2, pp. 27–46 (in Russian).

8. Karasik V. I. Struktura institutsional’nogo diskursa [Structure of institutional discourse]. Problemy rechevoy kommunikatsii. Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Problems of speech communication. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers]. Saratov, 2000. Pp. 25–33 (in Russian).

9. Kobylkina E. V., Kobenko Y. V. Problemy i protivorechiya yazykovoy politiki v rossiyskom obrazovanii v kontekste mirovykh global’nykh protsessov [Problems and contradictions of language policy in Russian education in the context of global processes]. Yazykovoye obrazovaniye v sovremennom tsifrovom prostranstve: materialy Мezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Khabarovsk, 11–12 noyabrya 2021 g. [Language education in the modern digital space: the international scientific and practical conference proceedings, Khabarovsk, November 11–12, 2021]. Khabarovsk: Far Eastern State Transport University Publ., 2021. Pp. 10–14 (in Russian).

10. Lippmann W. Public opinion. New York: Free Press, 1997. 288 p. (Russ. ed.: Lippman U. Obshchestvennoe mnenie: per. s ang. T. V. Barchunovoy. Moscow, Institut Fonda «Obshchestvennoye mneniye» Publ., 2004. 384 p.).

11. Staurskaya N. V. Yazykovaya reprezentatsiya lingvokul’turnogo stereotipa kak sredstva portretizatsii personazha (na materiale proizvedeniy U. S. Moema, O. Khaksli i I. Vo). Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Linguistic representation of a linguocultural stereotype as a means of portraying a character (based on the works of W. S. Maugham, A. Huxley and E. Waugh). Diss. cand. of philol. sci.]. Omsk, 2017. 238 p. (in Rusian).

12. Nekrasova A. E. Diskursivnyy analiz vyskazyvaniy, otrazhayushchikh stereotipy vzaimovospriyatiya anglichan i frantsuzov (na materiale kachestvennoy britanskoy i frantsuzskoy pressy). Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Discursive analysis of statements reflecting stereotypes of mutual perception of the British and the French (on the material of British and French quality press). Diss. cand. of philol. sci.]. Moscow, 2009. 115 p. (in Russian).

13. Kosyakov V. A. Stereotip kak kognitivno-yazykovoy fenomen (na materialakh SMI, posvyashchennykh voyne v Irake). Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Stereotype as a cognitive and linguistic phenomenon (on the materials of mass media about the Iraq War). Abstract of thesis cand. of philol. sci.]. Irkutsk, 2009. 23 p. (in Russian).

14. Prokhorov Yu. E. Natsional’nyye sotsiokul’turnyye stereotipy rechevogo obshcheniya i ikh rol’ v obuchenii russkomu yazyku inostrantsev [National socio-cultural stereotypes of speech communication and their role in teaching Russian to foreigners]. Moscow, LKI Publ., 2008. 224 p. (in Russian).

15. Krasnykh V. V. Etnopsikholingvistika i lingvokul’turologiya: kurs lektsiy [Ethnopsycholinguistics and linguoculturology: a course of lectures]. Moscow, ITDGK Gnozis Publ., 2002. 284 p. (in Russian).

16. Orlova O. G. Diskursivnaya teoriya stereotipa. Avtoref. dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Discursive Theory of Stereotype. Abstract of thesis doct. of philol. sci.]. Kemerovo, 2013. 34 p. (in Russian).

17. Maslova V. A. Lingvokul’turologiya: uchebnoye posobiye [Linguoculturology: a textbook]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2001. 208 p. (in Russian).

18. Sorokina N. V. Metodologicheskaya tipologiya stereotipov kak komponent soderzhaniya obucheniya inostrannym yazykam v vuze [Methodological typology of stereotypes as a component of educational content in teaching foreign languages at universities]. Yazyk i kul’tura – Language and culture, 2013, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 120–139 (in Russian).

19. Vilinbakhova E. L. Modeli reprezentatsii stereotipov v russkom yazyke. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Models of stereotype representation in Russian language. Diss. cand. of philol. sci.]. Saint Petersburg, 2011. 209 p. (in Russian).

20. Pervukhina S. V. Mekhanizmy adaptatsii teksta v uchebno-pedagogicheskom diskurse [Mechanisms of text adaptation in educational discourse]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Volgograd State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2019, no. 6 (139), pp. 43–46 (in Russian).

21. Bori P. Language textbooks in the era of neoliberalism. London and N.Y.: Rutledge, 2018. 205 p.

22. Kurdt-Cristiansen X. L., Weninger C. The politics of textbooks in language education. London and NY: Rutledge, 2015. 241 p.

23. Risager K. Representations of the world in language textbooks. Bristol, Multilingual Matters, 2018. 516 p.

24. Alpatov V. M., Arkad’yev P. M., Podlesskaya V. I. Teoreticheskaya grammatika yaponskogo yazyka. Kniga 1 [Theoretical grammar of the Japanese language. Book 1]. Moscow, Natalis Publ., 2008. 60 p. (in Russian).

25. Hirata M. Otvety na komplimenty [Compliment responses]. Izvestiya Mezhdunarodnogo studencheskogo tsentra Gosudarstvennogo universiteta Yokogama – Yokohama National University International Student Center Bulletin, 1999, no. 6, pp. 38–47 (in Japanese).

26. Gonchar M. S. Pozhelaniye i kompliment kak natsional’no oriyentirovannyye rechevyye taktiki v rechi russkikh i predstaviteley Vostochnoy Azii na russkom yazyke. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Wishing and complimenting as ethnically oriented speech tactics in the speech of Russians and East Asians in Russian language. Diss. cand. of philol. sci.]. Saint Petersburg, 2018. 166 p. (in Russian).

27. Wierzbicka A. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford University Press, 1996. 512 p. (Russ ed.: Vezhbitskaya A. Semanticheskiye universalii i opisaniye yazykov. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1999. 780 p.).

kozachina_anna_vladimirovna_40_47_3_227_2023.pdf ( 479.21 kB ) kozachina_anna_vladimirovna_40_47_3_227_2023.zip ( 471.68 kB )

Issue: 3, 2023

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: COMPARATIVE AND APPLIED LINGUISTICS

Pages: 40 — 47

Downloads: 1157

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU