Russian iconic words visual perception, taking into account the neurocognitive profile
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2023-4-7-16
The article presents the results of Russian iconic words visual perception, taking into account the neurocognitive profile of the participants and using the “Lexical Solution” method in participants with a right-handedness and left-handedness. The procedure of psychosemantic research was carried out according to the classical scheme of “Lexical decision” in the paradigm of making a decision about a semantic stimulus as a word or not a word with a limited time to choose. Each participant was presented with three types of stimuli: sound-imitative (SI) words, divided into 4 groups according to the stages of deiconization or loss of iconicity (32 words – 8 from each group), non-SI words (32), non-words (64) in random order. During the test, the following series of indicators were recorded: the time of identification, the number of identification errors, the number of delays. The experimental session was preceded by a training session, during which 10 words and non-words were presented in random order. Also within the framework of this research, classical methods of assessing the neurocognitive profile of the participants were used. Based on the analysis of the results of the study, it can be concluded that respondents with left-handedness are characterized by rigidity and weak automation of cognitive functions, impulsivity, a wider range of equivalence. Participants with a leading left hand also, were more likely to give incorrect answers in the samples “SI-1”, “SI-3” and “non word”, spend more time and more often do not have time to give an answer to the SI-stimulus compared to right-handed respondents. At the same time, subjects with a leading right-hand visual perception of sound-forming words are more often more accurate than subjects with left-handers. The conducted study indicates statistically significant differences in the accuracy and speed of recognition of DI stimuli of different types in people who are right-handed or left-handed. The results obtained require additional clarifications on a larger sample to confirm the available data, which may be the next stage of the study.
Keywords: left-handedness, neurocognitive profile, psychosemantics, sound acuity, lexical solution
References:
1. Nielsen A. K., Dingemanse M. Iconicity in Word Learning and Beyond: A Critical Review. Language and speech, 2021, no. 64 (1), pp. 52–72. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830920914339 (accessed 14 November 2022).
2. Kawahara S. Sound symbolism and theoretical phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2020, no. 14 (8), pp. el12372.
3. Ramachandran V. S., Hubbard E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia – a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of consciousness studies, 2001, no. 8 (12), pp. 3–34.
4. Sidhu D. M., Pexman P. M. Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association. Psychonomic bullet interview, 2018, no. 25 (5), pp. 1619–1643.
5. Tkacheva L. O., Sedelkina Y. G., Nasledov A. D. Possible cognitive mechanisms for identifying visually-presented soundsymbolic words. Psychology in Russia: State of the art, 2019, no. 12 (1), pp. 188–200.
6. Semenovich A. V. Eti neveroyatnyye levshi: prakticheskoye posobiye dlya psikhologov i roditeley [These incredible lefts-handed: a practical guide for psychologists and parents]. Moscow, Genezis Publ., 2009. 250 p. (in Russian).
7. Beglova L. I., Skobenko L. D. Organizatsiya protsessa obucheniya levorukikh detey v nachal’noy shkole [Organization of the process of teaching left-handed children in primary school]. Innovatsionnaya nauka, 2018, no. 9, pp. 50–53 (in Russian).
8. Shirokova I. V. Psikhologicheskiye aspekty levorukosti: ponyatiye, prichiny, osobennosti [Psychological aspects of lefthandedness: concept, causes, features]. Kompleksnyye issledovaniya detstva, 2019, no. 1, vol. 1, pp. 73–79 (in Russian).
9. Avezmurodovich O. R. Difficulties in learning to write and read left-handed children. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 2020, no. 8 (8), 40, vol. 45.
10. Danilova N. N. Psikhofiziologiya [Psychophysiology]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., 1999. 368 p. (in Russian).
11. Postoyev V. A, Pakhomov V. P. Sovremennyye neyropsikhologicheskiye predstavleniya o fenomene levshestva [Modern neuropsychological ideas about the phenomenon of left-handedness]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2010, no. 2 (92), pp. 113–117 (in Russian).
12. Arakelov G. G., Shott E. K. Osobennosti stressovoy reaktsii u pravshey i levshey [Features of stress reaction in right-handed and left-handed people]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya, 2004, no. 2, pp. 3–21 (in Russian).
13. Pardeshi P., Akita K. Ideophones, mimetics and expressives. Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives, 2019. 335 p.
14. Flaksman M., Bauer M., Zirker A., Fischer O., Ljungberg C. Iconic treadmill hypothesis. Dimensions of iconicity, 2007, pp. 15–38.
15. Voeltz F. E., Kilian-Hatz C. Ideophones. Vol. 44. John Benjamins Publ., 2001. Pp. 1–8.
16. Monaghan P., Fletcher M. Do sound symbolism effects for written words relate to individual phonemes or to phoneme features? Language and Cognition, 2019, no. 11 (2), pp. 235–255.
17. Sidhu D. M., Vigliocco G., Pexman P. M. Effects of iconicity in lexical decision. Language and cognition, 2020, no. 12 (1), pp. 164–181.
18. Citron F. M., Weekes B. S., Ferstl E. C. How are affective word ratings related to lexicosemantic properties? Evidence from the Sussex Affective Word List. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2014, no. 35 (2), pp. 313–331.
19. Vermeulen N., Corneille O., Niedenthal P. M. Sensory load in curs conceptual processing costs. Cognition, 2008, no. 109 (2), pp. 287–294.
20. Connell L., Lynott D. Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concretenessor imageability. Cognition, 2012, no. 125 (3), pp. 452–465.
21. Boldyrev N. N. Kognitivnyy podkhod v lingvistike i smezhnykh oblastyakh znaniy [Cognitive approach in linguistics and related fields of knowledge]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki – I sues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2020, no. 2, pp. 5–25 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2020-2-5-25
22. Flaksman M. A., Lavitskaya Yu. V., Sedelkina Yu. G., Tkacheva L. O. Kriterii otbora stimul’nogo materiala dlya issledovaniya vizual’nogo vospriyatiya zvukoizobrazitel’nykh slov rodnogo i inostrannogo yazyka metodom “leksicheskoye resheniye” [Standard for the selection of stimulus material for the study of visual perception of sound-imaginative words of native and foreign languages by the “Lexical Solution” method]. Diskurs, 2020, no. 6 (5), pp. 97–112 (in Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2020-6-5-97-112 (accessed 14 November 2022).
23. Rayner K., Pollatsek A. Eye-Movement Control in Reading. Handbook of Psycholinguistics (Second Edition). Ed. by Traxler M. J., Gernsbacher M. A. Academic Press, Elsevier, 2006. P. 613–657 (accessed 14 November 2022). URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50017-1
24. Flaksman M. A., Tkacheva L. O., Sedelkina Yu. G., Lavitskaya Yu. V. et. al. Fonosemantika: opyt mezhdistsiplinarnogo issledovaniya [Phonosemantics: the experience of interdisciplinary research]. Moscow, Mir nauki Publ., 2022. 229 р. (in Russian). URL: https://izd-mn.com/69mnnpm22.html (accessed 11 January 2022).
25. Kiose M. I., Kharlamova T. G. Kognitivnyye i glazodvigatel’nyye tekhniki konventsionalizatsii nepryamykh nominativnykh kompleksov [Cognitive and oculomotor techniques of the conventionalization of indirect nominative complexes]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki – Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2021, no. 1, pp. 5–16 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2021-1-5-16.
( 639.31 kB ) 
( 412.32 kB )
Issue: 4, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: THEORETICAL AND COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS
Pages: 7 — 16
Downloads: 1160