Quiz show as a hybrid genre of media discourse
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2023-4-110-118
Nowadays the line between the mediagenres has become increasingly blurred. For this reason genre hybridity is an important and relevant feature of media texts. This paper focuses on description of the features of the genre structure of TV quiz show, which determine genre hybridization. The major objective of this study is to investigate types of hybridity. The research material is outlets of the Russian quiz shows “Clever girls and clever boys” and “What? Where? When?” on Channel One. We consider TV quiz show speech genre as communicative event intellectual game realization. Hence, we draw on Borisova I. N. communicative event conception and linguopragmatic method. According to linguopragmatic method, within the scope of our discussion are the communicative situations of the game, corresponding to its stages, and the role relations of communication partners, including situational-role variation of speech. The results indicate that quiz show is a very clear example of hybrid media genre. Quiz show has such types of hybridization as genre, discursive, polycode and polytext hybridity. Genre hybridity is due to hypergenre nature of quiz show which implies the inclusion of a number of subgenres in its structure. Discursive hybridity is a result of the combination of sports, judicial, didactic and entertainment discourse. Polytext hybridity is the combination of precedent texts and the use of stylization. Polycode hybridity is characterized with the interaction of various sign systems. In summary, hybridization of quiz show determines manifestations of new genre features, such as a trend towards symmetry of communication and intimization; tendencies to role variation of the television anchorman’s speech; trends towards polylogue use; stylization trends. The scientific novelty of the research is putting to use the new notion “discursive hybridity”.
Keywords: discourse analysis, media discourse, speech genre, hybrid genre, quiz show
References:
1. Anisimova E. E. O geterogennosti religioznogo diskursa [On the heterogeneity of religious discourse]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnyye nauki – Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 2013, no. 675, pp. 9–22 (in Russian).
2. Shchipitsina L. Yu. Vidy gibridnosti v komp’yuterno-oposredovannoy kommunikatsii [Types of hybridity in computer-mediated communication]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Zhurnalistika – Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philology. Journalism, 2014, iss. 14, no. 3, pp. 30–35 (in Russian).
3. Karasik V. I. Vyskazyvaniye, zhanr, diskurs: semioticheskoye modelirovaniye [Statement, genre, discourse: semiotic modeling]. Zhanry rechi, 2020, no. 2 (26), pp. 90–99 (in Russian).
4. Pankratova O. A. Lingvosemioticheskaya kharakteristika sportivnogo diskursa. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Linguistic and semiotic characteristics of sports discourse. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Volgograd, 2005. 24 p. (in Russian).
5. Dubrovskaya T. V. Interv’yu s sud’yami kak gibridnyy tip diskursa [Interviews with judges as a hybrid type of discourse]. Yurislingvistika, 2010, pp. 25–35 (in Russian).
6. Voytak M. O. O zhanrakh rechi i ikh pechatnykh konkretizatsiyakh [On the genres of speech and their printed specification]. Medialingvistika, 2014, no. 1 (4), pp. 53–62 (in Russian).
7. Kolosova A. A. O trudnostyakh zhanrovogo analiza novostnykh mediatekstov [On the Difficulties of Genre Analysis of News Media Texts]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philology. Theory and Practice, 2015, no. 3 (46), pp. 112–114 (in Russian).
8. Mar’yanchik V. A. Media-politicheskiy tekst: stsenarii, normy, stereotipy [Media political text: scenarios, norms, stereotypes]. Arkhangel’sk, Pomorskiy universitet Publ., 2011. 282 p. (in Russian).
9. Borisova S. S. Persuazivnyye strategii v analiticheskikh zhanrakh mediateksta. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Persuasive strategies in analytical genres of media text. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Voronezh, 2016. 22 p. (in Russian).
10. Shmeleva T. V. “Uplotneniye zhanrov” kak tendentsiya mediasfery [“Condensation of genres” as a trend in the media sphere]. Zhanry rechi, 2018, no. 4 (20), pp. 270–276 (in Russian).
11. Tyrygina V. A. Problema zhanra v massovo-informatsionnom diskurse. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol.nauk [The problem of genre in mass information discourse. Abstract of thesis cand. philol. sci.]. Moscow, 200. 47 p. (in Russian).
12. “Umnitsy i umniki” [“Clever boys and clever girls”] (in Russian). URL: https://www.1tv.ru/shows/umnicy-i-umniki (accessed 15 February 2023).
13. “Chto? Gde? Kogda?” [“What? Where? When?”] (in Russian). URL: https://www.1tv.ru/shows/chto-gde-kogda (accessed 15 February 2023).
14. Borisova I. N. Russkiy razgovornyy dialog: struktura i dinamika [Russian colloquial dialogue: structure and dynamics]. Moscow, 2009. 320 p. (in Russian).
15. Dement’yev V. V. Sotsiopragmaticheskiy aspekt teorii rechevykh zhanrov [Socio-pragmatic aspect of the theory of speech genres]. Saratov, Saratov Pedagogical Institute Publ., 1998. 107 p. (in Russian).
16. Tarasova A. N. Arkhitekstual’nost’: diskurs – rechevoy zhanr – tekst (na materiale frantsuzskoy pressy) [Architextuality: discourse – speech genre – text (based on the French press)]. 2016, no. 12 (751), pp. 190–198 (in Russian).
17. Dobrosklonskaya T. G. Massmediynyy diskurs v sisteme medialingvistiki [Media discourse in the system of media linguistics]. Medialingvistika, 2015, no. 1 (6), pp. 45–56 (in Russian).
18. Khotnog A. V. Priroda gibridnogo diskursa (na materiale frantsuzskogo yazyka) [The nature of hybrid discourse (based on the French language)]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philology. Theory and Practice, 2019, no. 8, pp. 190–194 (in Russian).
( 437.46 kB ) 
( 428.29 kB )
Issue: 4, 2023
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: RUSSIAN LANGUAGE
Pages: 110 — 118
Downloads: 339