Speech genre of autobiography as a discourse practice (based on the text by V. Ya. Bulokhov)
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2024-3-65-73
The concept of discursive practice as a method of socially oriented speech activity is effective for describing the processes of creation and results (speech works, texts) of an individual linguistic personality who carries out his professional activities in communications of various types, genres, targeted orientation, etc. Certain texts of such a personality can be considered a kind of discursive practice (on the basis of social orientation, implementation of a set of speech genres, manifestations of the subjective principle, expressiveness/non-expression of address focus, thematic and semantic organization, cognitive dominant, etc.). The purpose of the article is to identify discursive parameters related to the thematic, cognitive, communicative embodiment of the linguistic personality of the author (philologist), methods of transmitting information, organizing communication with the addressee in artistic and journalistic speech activity of an autobiographical orientation. Analysis of the text of the memoir type “Autobiography” (written by Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Krasnoyarsk philologist V. Ya. Bulokhov) revealed ways of realizing the author’s linguistic personality at the structural, thematic, communicative cognitive levels of the organization of artistic and journalistic discourse, as well as features of discursive practice through the use of social regulations and personal type. Regulators draw the addressee’s attention to the connection of the reported information with the social context of a “broad” or “narrow” type, the interaction of chronotopes “there and then”, “here and now”, “while the prognostic now”. The use of analysis of the thematic and structural organization of the text, identification of modes of communication, their alternation, features of updating the cognitive composition using means of transmitting information at the semantic, pragmatic levels made it possible to establish leading speech strategies that mark the autobiographical discursive practice of a linguistic personality, whose speech activity is characterized by lexical, syntactic, communicative, pragma-style variability, diversity of spatio-temporal and egocentric deictic components of discursive practices of text-forming means.
Keywords: discourse, text, discursive practice, communicative, structural, semantic, cognitive organization of the text, regulative, artistic and journalistic discourse
References:
1. Yorgansen M. V., Filips L. Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod [Discourse analysis. Theory and method]. Kharkov, 2008. 353 p. (in Russian).
2. Vodak R. Vzaimosvyaz’ “diskurs – obshchestvo”: kognitivnyy podkhod k kriticheskomu diskursanalizu [The relationship between “discourse and society”: a cognitive approach to critical discourse analysis]. In: Budayev E. V., Chudinov A. P. (eds) Sovremennaya politicheskaya lingvistika [Modern political linguistics]. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical University Publ., 2006. pp. 123–136 (in Russian).
3. Karasik V. I. O tipakh diskursa [On the types of discourse]. In: Yazykovaya lichnost’: institutsional’nyy i personal’nyy diskurs: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Language personality: institutional and personal discourse: collection of scientific works]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2000. P. 5–20 (in Russian).
4. Karasik V. I. Yazykovyye klyuchi [Language keys]. Volgograd, Paradigma Publ., 2007. 520 p. (in Russian).
5. Issers O. S. Lyudi govoryat: diskursivnyye praktiki nashego vremeni [People speak: discursive practices of our time]. Omsk, Omsk State University Publ., 2012. 275 p. (in Russian).
6. Issers O. S. Diskursivnaya praktika kak nablyudayemaya real’nost’ [Discursive practice as observable reality]. Vestnik Omskogo Universiteta – Herald of Omsk University, 2011, no. 4, pp. 227–232 (in Russian).
7. Chernyavskaya V. Ye. Fantomy i sindromy diskursivnoy paradigmy [Phantoms and syndromes of the discursive paradigm]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki – Issues of cognitive linguistics, 2014, no. 1 (38), pp. 54–61 (in Russian).
8. Nikonova Ye. A. Diskursivnaya praktika i kommunikativnaya strategiya: eklektika vs poliparadigmatizm? [Discursive practice and communicative strategy: eclecticism vs polyparadigmatism?]. Nauchnyy dialog – Scientific Dialogue, 2023, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 123–139 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-6-123-139
9. Feshchenko V. V. Khudozhestvennyy diskurs: k opredeleniyu termina v perspektive lingvoestetiki [Artistic discourse: towards the definition of a term in the perspective of linguistic aesthetics]. Novyy filologicheskiy vestnik – New Philological Bulletin, 2021, no. 1 (56), pp. 16–35 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24411/2072-9316-2021-00001
10. Chernyavskaya V. Ye. Diskurs vlasti i vlast’ diskursa: problemy rechevogo vozdeystviya [Discourse of power and the power of discourse: problems of speech influence]. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2006. 134 p. (in Russian).
11. Chernyavskaya V. Ye. Tekst i sotsial’nyy kontekst: sotsiolingvisticheskiy i diskursivnyy analiz smysloporozhdeniya [Text and social context: sociolinguistic and discourse analysis of meaning generation]. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2021. 208 p. (in Russian).
12. Butakova L. O., Orlova N. V. Semantika diskursa Semantics of discourse [Semantics of discourse]. Filologicheskiy klass, 2022, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 30–37 (in Russian). DOI: 10.51762/1FK-2022-27-04-03
13. Dijk T. A. van. Discourse, semantics and ideology. Discourse and society. L. etc., 1995. Vol. 6, no. 2. Pp. 243–289.
14. Fairclough N. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, Polity Publ., 1992. 259 p.
15. Issers O. S. Diskursivnaya praktika: k opredeleniyu ponyatiya [Discursive practice: to the definition of the concept]. Sovremennaya rechevaya kommunikatsiya: novyye diskursivnyye praktiki [Modern speech communication: new discursive practices]. Omsk, Omsk State University Publ., 2011. Pp. 37–61 (in Russian).
16. Issers O. S. Kommunikativnyye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi [Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2002. 284 p. (in Russian).
17. Chernyavskaya V. Ye. “Diskurs – lider prodazh” ili rasprodazha diskursa? [“Discourse is the best seller” or the sale of discourse?]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 2012, no. 3, pp. 6–14 (in Russian).
18. Bolotnova N. S. Kontseptsiya emotivnosti V. I. Shakhovskogo v kontekste issledovaniy po kommunikativnoy stilistike teksta [Concept of emotiveness V. I. Shakhovsky in the context of research on communicative stylistics of the text]. Izvestiya VGPU. Filologicheskiye nauki – Ivzestia of the Volgograd State PedagogicalUniversity. Philological sciences, 2022, no. 3 (166), pp. 197–203 (in Russian).
19. Bulokhov V. Ya. Avtobiografiya [Autobiography]. Krasnoyarsk, RIO KSPU Publ., 2002. 124 p. (in Russian).
20. Kardanova-Biryukova K. S. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya rechevogo sobytiya: strukturno-evolyutsionnyy aspekt. Dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Linguistic theory of speech events: structural-evolutionary aspect. Diss. doc. philol. sci.]. Moscow, 2021. 359 p. (in Russian).
( 468.82 kB ) 
( 461.93 kB )
Issue: 3, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 3
Rubric: RUSSIAN LANGUAGE AND LANGUAGES OF THE PEOPLES OF RUSSIA
Pages: 65 — 73
Downloads: 1041