Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 09.12.2025
Home Issues 2025 Year Issue №4 Genre forms of professional Internet communication of teachers of Russian as a foreign language: enquiry, advice, objection
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Genre forms of professional Internet communication of teachers of Russian as a foreign language: enquiry, advice, objection

Kharitonova Irina Sergeevna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2025-4-86-94

Information About Author:

Kharitonova I.S., Lecturer, South Ural State University (National Research University) (pr. Lenina, 76, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454080). E-mail: kislovais@susu.ru; ORCID ID: 0009-0004-9500-2275; SPIN-code: 8705-4492.

The article analyses the written informal professional discourse of teachers of Russian as a foreign language in the aspect of genre forms. The material for the study are the messages of teachers of Russian as a foreign language taken from the closed professional chat room RCT Talks Methodology (https://t.me/rkitoday), created in the messenger Telegram in 2020.The paper considers the genre forms of request, advice and objection. The author's typology of advice request based on the presence/absence of a backstory is presented. Such varieties of requests with a backstory as a request for advice with background data about a student, a request for advice initiated by a question from a student, a request for help complaining about the futility of efforts are presented. It is shown that in requests with prehistory all variants are directly or indirectly related to the figure of the student. The results of the analysis of advice types are summarised and a conclusion is made about the significance of the ‘student’ component for the modal framework of advice: it is the subject of benefit. Tactics and techniques in objections centred around the identity of the student or directed at the identity of the questioner are identified and described. One of the tactics in objections of the first type is to point out the inconsistency of the asserted/suggested with something, for example, the goals and objectives of teaching, language proficiency level, language norms, linguistic and cultural realities. The risk of misleading students, causing confusion and errors due to the instructor's incorrect actions is explicated in risk warning tactics. In objections against colleagues, opponents resort to labelling, appealing to personality, paraphrasing. It has been proved that the formed competences of a foreign student are used as an indicator of the teacher's professional competence, i.e. in all the cases considered, the student's personality is mentioned in the statements. The regularity of including the figure of the student in the messages allows us to call such behaviour a communicative strategy. It is concluded that professional communication in chat interaction is characterised by a high degree of evaluation, predominantly negative: the genre forms of request and response are accompanied by the modality of complaint, irony, warning, criticism, etc. The authors conclude that professional communication in chat interaction is characterised by a high degree of evaluation, predominantly negative.

Keywords: professional communication, discourse of teachers of Russian as a foreign language, genre forms, request for advice, advice, objection

References:

1. Bakhtin M.M. Problema rechevyh zhanrov [Problem of Speech Genres]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1986. Рp. 428–472 (in Russian).

2. Golovanova E.I. Professional’nyy diskurs, subdiskurs, zhanr professional’noy kommunikatsii: sootnosheniye ponyatiy [Professional discourse, subdiscourse, genre of professional communication: correlation of notions]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Science Journal of Chelyabinsk State University, 2013, no. 1, pp. 32–35 (in Russian).

3. Aleshinskaya E.V. Teoretiko-metodologicheskiye osnovy razgranicheniya zhanrov professional’nogo diskursa [Theoretical and methodological bases for differentiating genres of professional discourse]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal. Philology, 2014, no. 5, pp. 5–23 (in Russian).

4. Akhtaeva L.A. Sistema zhanrov angloyazychnogo elektronnogo matematicheskogo diskursa [System of genres of Englishlanguage electronic mathematical discourse]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2015, vol. 3, pp. 13–21 (in Russian).

5. Kuchinskaya E.A., Larchenkova E.V. K voprosu o zhanrakh voennogo angloyazychnogo diskursa [To the question about the genres of military English-language discourse]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2017, no. 5, pp. 113–117 (in Russian).

6. Khalina E.E. Zhanrovaya differenciaciya politicheskogo diskursa: kriterii vydeleniya i gradaciya tipov [Genre differentiation of political discourse: criteria of selection and gradation of types]. Aktual’nye voprosy sovremennoy filologii i zhurnalistiki, 2022, no. 4, pp. 137–141 (in Russian).

7. Kositskaya F.L. Zhanrovaya palitra frantsuzskogo parfyumernogo diskursa [Genre palette of French perfume discourse]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2016, vol. 6, pp. 71–75 (in Russian).

8. Kositskaya F.L., Matyuhina M.V. K voprosu o zhanrovoy differentsiatsii frantsuzskogo nauchnogo meditsinskogo diskursa [To the question of genre differentiation of the French scientific medical discourse]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Science Journal of Tomsk State Pedagogical University, 2018, no.4, pp. 133–137 (in Russian).

9. Galichkina E.H. Pragmalingvistichekiye kharakteristiki zhanra «Chat» v komp’yuternom obshchenii [Pragmalinguistic characteristics of the genre “Chat” in computer communication]. Aksiologicheskaya lingvistika: problemy kommunikativnogo povedeniya [Axiological linguistics: problems of communicative behavior]. Volgograd, 2003. Pp. 161–167 (in Russian).

10. Smirnov F.O. Nacional’no-kul’turnye osobennosti elektronnoj kommunikacii na anglijskom i russkom yazykah. Dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [National-cultural peculiarities of electronic communication in English and Russian languages. Diss. ... cand. philol. sci.]. Yaroslavl, 2004. 222 p. (in Russian).

11. Kondrashov P.E. Komp’yuternyy diskurs: sotsiolingvisticheskiy aspekt. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Computer discourse: sociolinguistic aspect. Abstract of thesis .... cand. philol. sci.]. Krasnodar, 2004. 19 p. (in Russian).

12. Dement’ev V.V. O nekotorykh aktual’nykh voprosakh teorii vtorichnykh rechevykh zhanrov [On some topical issues of the theory of secondary speech genres]. Medialingvistika, 2015, no 3, pp. 35–45 (in Russian).

13. Kubrakova N.A. Princip kommunikativnogo gedonizma v zhanre chata internet-kommunikatsii [The principle of communicative hedonism in the chat genre of Internet communication]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Science Journal of Chelyabinsk State University, 2013, no. 4, pp.60–64 (in Russian).

14. Kolokol’tseva T.N. Dialogichnost’ v zhanrakh internet-kommunikatsii (chat, forum, blog) [Dialogicality in genres of Internet communication (chat, forum, blog)]. Zhanry rechi, 2016, no. 2, pp. 96–104 (in Russian).

15. Podgornaya E.A., Demidenko K.A. Lingvisticheskiye kharakteristiki internet-chatov kak vida kommunikatsii [Linguistic characteristics of Internet chats as a type of communication]. Koncept, 2014, no. 9 (in Russian).

16. Chuchkova G.S. O probleme obshcheniya v virtual’noy kommunikativnoy srede [On the problem of communication in virtual communicative environment]. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik – Omsk Scientific Bulletin, 2007, no 1. pp. 90–93 (in Russian).

17. Yablokova A.S. Diskursivnye strategii zaprosa/soveta v ramkakh formata rubriki «Agony Aunt» v amerikanskikh glyantsevykh SMI [Discursive strategies of asking for advice within the format of the “Agony Aunt” column in American glossy media]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikaciya – Scientific Journal of Voronezh State University. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2023, no 3. pp. 86–95 (in Russian).

18. Arutyunova N.D. Dialogicheskaya modal’nost’ i yavleniye tsitatsii [Dialogical modality and the phenomenon of quotation]. Chelovecheskiy faktor v yazyke. Kommunikatsiya, moda’nost’, deyksis [The human factor in language. Communication, modality, deixis.]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1992. P. 52–79 (in Russian).

19. Kharitonova I.S. Rechevoy zhanr «sovet» v professional’noy internet-kommunikacii (na materiale professional’nogo soobshchestva prepodavateley RKI) [Speech genre “advice” in professional Internet communication (on the material of the professional community of teachers of Russian as a foreign language)]. Shkatovskiye chteniya: materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Shkatov readings: materials of the International scientific conference (Chelaybinsk, 1 November, 2024]. Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinsk State University Publ., 2024. Pp. 143–149 (in Russian).

20. Vol’f E.M. Funktsional’naya semantika otsenki [Functional semantics of evaluation]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2002. 280 р. (in Russian).

21. Solov’yova A.A. Rechevoy zhanr “sovet” v raznykh tipakh diskursa: na materiale sovremennogo angliyskogo yazyka. Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Speech genre “advice” in different types of discourse: on the material of modern English language. Abstract of thesis ... cand. philol. sci.]. Volgograd, 2007. 16 р. (in Russian).

22. Kunaeva N.V. Diskursivnyy analiz vyskazyvaniy v situatsii vozrazheniya (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka). Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Discursive analysis of statements in the situation of objection (on the material of the English language). Abstract of thesis ... cand. philol. sci.]. Voronezh, 2009. 23 р. (in Russian).

23. Pavlyukovskaya N.S. Kommunikativnaya situatsiya nesoglasiya: obshchiye ponyatiya [Communicative situation of disagreement: general concepts]. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta – Scientific Journal of Irkutsk State Technical University, 2014, no. 2, pp. 293–297 (in Russian).

24. Neklyudov V.D. Iskusstvo spora [The Art of Dispute]. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Scientific Journal of Bryansk State University, 2013, no. 2, pp. 314–321 (in Russian).

kharitonova_irina_sergeevna_86_94_4_240_2025.pdf ( 434.01 kB ) kharitonova_irina_sergeevna_86_94_4_240_2025.zip ( 422.59 kB )

Issue: 4, 2025

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: RUSSIAN LANGUAGE

Pages: 86 — 94

Downloads: 277

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU