Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 07.12.2025
Home Issues 2025 Year Issue №5 Anglo-Saxon traditions in the system of education: university autonomy and academic freedom
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Anglo-Saxon traditions in the system of education: university autonomy and academic freedom

Loginova Marina Pavlovna

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2025-5-34-45

Information About Author:

Loginova M.P., Candidate of Sciences degree seeking applicant, Omsk State Pedagogical University (nab. Tukhachevskogo, Omsk, Russian Federation, 644099). E-mail: loginova.marina@gmail.com; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4772-1748; SPIN-code: 9748-6943

The characteristic of the Russian education system reforms in the late 20th and early 21st centuries was AngloSaxon pedagogical traditions borrowing into the Russian education. One of the key traditions of the American education system is considered to be its autonomy from state control and academic freedom. Today, national education is facing new challenges, which requires a critical reflection of the previous period in order to create a system that meets the requirements of modern Russian society. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the historical and socio-cultural factors that influenced the development of the tradition in American education, as well as to evaluate its functioning in the Russian educational context. The research methods include content analysis of works by well-known historians and experts in the field of education. This allows us to define the principles of university autonomy, identify the strengths and weaknesses of the tradition, and assess its functioning in the modern academic framework. The historical analysis is employed to identify the social and cultural conditions that contributed to the making of the tradition within American society. An analysis of the development of educational autonomy from legal perspective serves to highlight the relative nature of this concept in contemporary US education. Thus, the establishment of communities in the American colonies prior to the establishment of centralized government gave rise to the tradition of autonomy and self-governance. The aforementioned factor was pivotal in the evolution of university autonomy, whereas the tolerance towards religious diversity resulted in the emergence of academic freedom. However, the government continues to play an influential regulatory role in the nation’s educational sector, implementing policies that govern educational institutions. This dynamic consequently blurs the notion of university autonomy. Some scholars refer to recurring cases when university administrations employ the concept of academic freedom as a means of exerting pressure on teachers who are deemed to be at odds, which suggests the need to develop mechanisms of control by society. This research can be used for further study of issues related to university autonomy, academic freedom, and the borrowing of Anglo-Saxon pedagogical traditions in the Russian educational context.

Keywords: Anglo-Saxon tradition in education, autonomy of educational institutions, academic freedom, Russian education system, American education system, borrowing of educational traditions

References:

1. Loginova M.P. Vliyaniye anglosaksonskikh traditsiy na rossiyskuyu sistemu obrazovaniya [The Impact of Anglo-Saxon Traditions on the Russian System of Education]. In: Gumanitarnyye nauki v sovremennom vuze: vchera, segodnya, zavtra: materialy VII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii: v 2 tomakh. Saint Petersburg, 13 dekabrya 2024 goda. Tom 1 [Humanities in a modern university: yesterday, today, tomorrow: Proceedings of the VII International Scientific Conference St. Petersburg, December 13, 2024: in 2 volumes Vol. 1]. Edited by Yu.V. Vatolina, A.S. Minin. Saint Petersburg, FGBOUVO “SPbGUPTD” Publ., 2024. pp. 591–597 (in Russian).

2. Tocqueville A.D. Letters from America. Edited, translated, and with an introduction by Frederick Brown. New Haven and London, Yale University Press. 2010. 284 p.

3. Boorstin D.J. The Americans, the national experience. New York, Vintage Book. 1965. 517 p.

4. Flexner A. Funds and Foundations. Their Policies Past and Present. New York, Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1952. 146 p.

5. Bok D.C. Higher Learning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England. 1986. 206 p.

6. Barrow C.W. Universities and the Capitalist State. Corporate Liberalism and the Reconstruction of American Higher Education, 1894–1928. The University of Wisconsin Press. 1990. 329 p.

7. Lucas C.J. American Higher Education. A History. New York. Palgrave. Macmillan. 2006. 397 p.

8. Bok D.C. Beyond the ivory tower: social responsibilities of the modern university. Cambridge, Mass., London, England: Harvard University Press, 1982. 318 p.

9. Hofstadter R., Metzger W.P. The Development of Academic Freedom in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press. 1955. 527 p.

10. Conant J.B. Shaping Educational Policy. McGraw-Hill Book Company. New York Toronto. London. 1964. 141 p.

11. Smith D.H. The Bureau of Education. Its History, Activities and Organization. The Johns Hopkins Press: Baltimore, Maryland. 1923. 157 p.

12. Ravitch D. National Standards in American Education. A Citizen’s Guide. Washington, D.C. 1995. 224 p.

13. Allen H. P. The Federal Government and Education. The Original and Complete Study of Education for the Hoover Commission Task Force on Public Welfare. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc. New York. Toronto. London. 1950. 333 p.

14. Counts G. S. Education and American Civilization. Bureau of Publications Teachers College, Columbia University. New York. 1952. 491 p.

15. Wallenfeldt E.C. Roots of Special Interests in American Higher Education. University Press of America: Lanham, New York, London. 1986. 224 p.

16. Cowley W.H., Williams D. International and Historical Roots of American Higher Education. New York & London: Garland Publishing Inc. 1991. 237 p.

17. Finkin M., Post R. For the Common Good: Principles of American Academic Freedom. New Haven: CT: Yale University Press, 2009. 272 p.

18. Rudolph F. The American college and university [electronic resource]: a history / by Frederick Rudolph; introductory essay and supplemental bibliography by John R. Thelin. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1991. 563 p.

19. Thelin J.R. A History of American Higher Education. The John Hopkins University Press. Baltimore and London. 2004. 421 p.

20. Cohen A.M., Kisker C. B. The Shaping of American Higher Education. Emergence and Growth of the contemporary System. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass. 2010. 630 p.

21. Lucas C.J. American Higher Education. A History. New York. Palgrave, 2006. 397 p.

22. Kananykina E.S. Istoriya obrazovatel’nogo zakonodatel’stva Ameriki XX stoletiya [The History of American Educational Legislation in the XX century]. Aktual’nyye voprosy sovremennoy nauki, 2012, no. 22 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/istoriya-obrazovatelnogo-zakonodatelstva-ameriki-xx-stoletiya (accessed 30 September 2024).

23. Pettit E. Was this Professor Dangerous? URL: https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/was-this-professor-dangerous/docview/2405689325/se-2 (accessed 28 July 2020).

24. Abbott S. A Report on the UVU “Final Investigation Report”: The Case Of Professor Michael Shively. URL: https://uvuaaup.blogspot.com/2020/04/a-report-on-uvu-final-investigation.html (accessed 14 July 2025).

25. O’Neil R. Academic Freedom in the Wired World. Political Extremism, Corporate Power, and the University. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England. 2008. 312 p.

26. Golovko N.V. Deklaratsiia akademicheskikh svobod i polnomochiy: istoricheskiy kontekst i osnovaniya akademicheskoy svobody [Declaration of Principles on Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure: Historical Background and the Principles of Academic Freedom]. Uchenye zapiski ZabGU. Ser.: Sotsiologicheskiye nauki, 2017, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 60–70. doi: 10.21209/2500-171X-2017-12-3-60-70 (in Russian)

loginova_marina_pavlovna_34_45_5_241_2025.pdf ( 503.08 kB ) loginova_marina_pavlovna_34_45_5_241_2025.zip ( 498.32 kB )

Issue: 5, 2025

Series of issue: Issue 5

Rubric: GENERAL PEDAGOGY, HISTORY OF PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION

Pages: 34 — 45

Downloads: 191

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU