Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 09.04.2026
Home Issues 2025 Year Issue №6 Tripartite nature of language: systemic and functional dependencies
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Tripartite nature of language: systemic and functional dependencies

Kobenko Y.V.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2025-6-20-29

Information About Author:

Kobenko Yu.V., Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (pr. Lenina, 30, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050). E-mail: serpentis@tpu.ru; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2940-2233; SPIN-code: 7822-2860

The article is devoted to the description of the language structure from the standpoint of structural-systemic and functional linguistics. It is proposed to distinguish between the system, function and set of rules that collectively ensure the communicative suitability of the language: elements of vocabulary sets are combined in speech according to certain rules in order to create new expressive means. The systemic pole of the language is static and stereotypical: it includes vocabulary elements structured in a hypo-hyperonymic way. The area of hyperonymy indicates the condensation of the semantic feature in the core of the vocabulary set, and hyponymy indicates its dispersion to the periphery, where there is a zone of overlap with other thematically related fields. Hyponyms clarify the general meaning of the hypernym and represent a tree-like branching (rhizome) that forms the onomasiological structure of the field. The system is determined by the formula L = A + S, where L (langue – system), A is a limited vocabulary set (symbol of mathematical logic) and S is the structural organization of the incoming elements. The functional pole of language is dynamic and has its own structure, built in the logic of aggregation (from smaller to larger): expressive means are enlarged to registers of expressive-semantic coloring, registers form genres, genres are built into styles and functional styles, whose ‘five-petal’ makes up the functional repertoire of language. The varieties of repertoire are determined by various kinds of restrictions associated with the variation of language: social (acrolects, basilects, metalects), territorial (dialects, koine), professional (sociolects, professiolects) and historical (historiolects, adstrates). The function is found by the formula {E}A1 U (mathematical operator of unification) {E}A2 = expressive means. Speech combination of expressive means that increase the applicativity of language is carried out in accordance with the rules that are structured not only by the levels (tiers) of language (phonetic, morphological, lexical and syntactic), but also in accordance with the rhetorical (stylistic) and pragmatic schemes of the composition of means. Due to this, it is proposed to abandon the obsolete term ‘grammar’ and replace it with more appropriate ‘rules of language’. The findings can be used both for purely theoretical needs and in the practice of teaching and organizing language training.

Keywords: language composition, structure, system, function, grammar, rule, vocabulary set, elements, speech combination

References:

1. Hockett Ch. Man’s Place in Nature. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1973. 739 p.

2. Deacon T.W. The Symbolic Species: the Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York, W.W. Norton, 1998. 528 p.

3. Kortlandt F. The Origin and Nature of the Linguistic Parasite. Language in time and space. Berlin, Mouton, 2003. Pp. 241–244.

4. Weisman A.D. Grechesko-russkiy slovar’ [Greek-Russian dictionary]. Saint Petersburg, samizdat, 1899. 1371 p. (in Russian).

5. Fasmer M. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka: v 4 t. T. 3 (Muza – Syat) [Etymological dictionary of the Russian language. In 4 vol. Vol. 3 (Muse – Syat)]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1987. 832 p. (in Russian).

6. Van Driem G. The Origin of Language: Symbiosism and Symbiomism. Hot Pursuit of Language in Prehistory. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2008. P. 381–400.

7. Kobenko Yu.V. Teoreticheskiye osnovy funktsional’noy stilistiki [Theoretical bases of functional stylistics]. Tomsk, Tomsk Polytechnic University Publ., 2023. 296 p. (in Russian).

8. Saveliev S.V. Morfologiya soznaniya: v 2 t. T. 2 [Morphology of consciousness. In 2 vol. Vol. 2]. Moscow, VEDI Publ., 2021. 208 p. (in Russian).

9. Kobenko Yu.V. Aspekty mediynoy kommunikatsii v sotsial’nykh setyakh [Aspects of media communication in social networks]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Yazyk i literatura – Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature, 2023, 20 (1), pp. 183–190. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2023.111 (in Russian).

10. Savitsky V.M., Doladova O.V. O protivorechiyakh vo vzglyadakh na sistemnost’ yazyka [On contradictions in views on the systematicity of language]. Mir lingvistiki i kommunikatsii: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal – The World of Linguistics and Communication: electronic scientific journal, 2017, no. 1, pp. 35–44 (in Russian).

11. Schweikle G. An Overview of Germanic-German Language History. Stuttgart, Weimar, J. B. Metzler, 2002. 283 p.

12. The German. Episode 01: Otto und the Empire. ZDF. URL: https://www.zdf.de/video/dokus/die-deutschen-140/otto-und-das-reich-100 (accessed 30 March 2025).

13. Belousov K.I., Taleski A., Ryabinin K.V., Boronnikova N.V. The impact of communicative parameters on the speaker’s spatial orientation in virtual reality. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Yazyk i literatura – Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature, 2024, no. 21 (1), pp. 269–287. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2024.114

14. Gellner E. Slova i veshchi [Words and Things]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo inostrannoy literatury Publ., 1962. 344 p. (in Russian).

15. Alpatov V. Yazykoznaniye: Ot Aristotelya do komp’yuternoy lingvistiki [Linguistics: From Aristotle to Computational Linguistics]. Moscow, Al’pina non-fikshn Publ., 2018. 253 p. (in Russian).

16. Vorobyova E.N. Ekspressivnaya funktsiya yazyka: sistemnyy obzor [Expressive function of language: a systemic review]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological sciences. Theoretical and Practical Issues, 2023, vol. 16, issue 1, pp. 119–126 (in Russian).

17. Skripichnikova N.S. Funktsionirovaniye yedinits ustnoy professional’noy kommunikatsii sotrudnikov pravookhranitel’nykh organov v yazyke SMI [Functioning of units of oral professional communication of law enforcement officers in the language of the media]. Vesnik Chelaybinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. Iskusstvovedeniye – Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. Philology. Art Criticism, 2013, no. 22 (313), issue 81, pp. 170–173 (in Russian).

18. Galaktionov S.S. Novokaledonskiy variant frantsuzskogo yazyka: predposylki vozniknoveniya i issledovatel’skiye perspektivy [New Caledonian French: Prerequisites for its Emergence and Research Prospects]. Estestvennyye yazyki na avtokhtonnykh territoriyakh i za ikh predelami [Natural Languages in Autochthonous Territories and Beyond]. Eds. E.O. Oparina, M.B. Rarenko. Moscow, INION RAN Publ., 2024. Pp. 112–128 (in Russian).

19. Matytsina M.S. Kombinatorika sredstv yazyka pri vyrazhenii zavisti i revnosti (na materiale angliyskoy razgovornoy rechi) [Combinatorics of language means in expressing envy and jealousy (based on English colloquial speech)]. Philological sciences. Theoretical and practical issues, 2013, no. 8 (26): in 2 parts, part I, pp. 102–105 (in Russian).

20. Ivanov V.V. Lingvistika tret’yego tysyacheletiya: Voprosy k budushchemu [Linguistics of the Third Millennium: Questions for the Future]. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Culture Publ., 2004. 208 p. (in Russian).

21. Kozlova L.A. Vzaimodeystviye faktorov entropii i analogii v ikh proyektsii na yazykovyye izmeneniya [Interaction of entropy and analogy factors in their projection on language changes]. Reports of the Bashkir University, 2024, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 130–137 (in Russian). DOI: 10.33184/dokbsu-2024.3.16

22. Precht R. Anna, the School and the Good Lord. The Education System’s Betrayal of Our Children. Munich, W. Goldmann, 2013. 351 p.

kobenko_yuriy_viktorovich_20_29_6_242_2025.pdf ( 444.31 kB ) kobenko_yuriy_viktorovich_20_29_6_242_2025.zip ( 440.21 kB )

Issue: 6, 2025

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: THEORETICAL LINGUISTICS

Pages: 20 — 29

Downloads: 290

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU