Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 24.02.2026
Home Issues 2025 Year Issue №6 Genre features of the medical myth in the sacred text of the Torah
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Genre features of the medical myth in the sacred text of the Torah

Stepanova E.S.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2025-6-67-75

Information About Author:

Stepanova E.S., Candidate of Philogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Samara State Medical University (ul. Chapayevskaya, 89, Samara, Russian Federation, 443099). E-mail: pretty.step@bk.ru; ORCID 0000-0002-2707-7222, SPIN-code: 6992-0076; Author ID: 732441; Scopus Profile: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57222422219

The medical myth in the sacred text realizes matters concerning the knowledge about diseases and methods of their treatment. The medical myth is a complex phenomenon that arises as a result of interaction of people within a certain linguocultural community and influences its norms and values. The purpose of this study is to describe the genre specifics of medical myths in the sacred text of the Torah and to consider their plot and thematic content. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that the genre features of the medical myth in the sacred text have not yet become the object of the research. The theoretical significance of the work is determined by the fact that the results of this study contribute to the study of the genre features of the medical myth in the sacred texts of various religions. The practical significance of the work lies in the potential application of the research into the genre features of the medical myth in practical classes on the stylistics of the English language, devoted to the analysis of the semantic and meaningful space of the medical myth and its metaphorical representation in sacred texts in English. The proposed research methodology is as follows: 1) analysis of the genre features of the medical myth as a complex archetypal complex; 2) description of the typology of the medical myth in the sacred text of the Torah, which represents its genre features, using metaphorical framing. The typology of medical myths in the sacred text of the Torah is as follows: the myth of the epidemic of the disease, the myth of the snake bite, the myth of surrogate motherhood. These myths can be described using metaphorical framing. The analysis shows that the genre features of the medical myth as a complex archetypal complex are characterized by figurativeness, which is reflected in the emblematic features of this myth. Mythological figurativeness, firstly, is manifested in archetypal events in the medical myth, which arose on the basis of archaic beliefs about illness as a result of the action of evil spirits. Secondly, the myth shows the sacredness of the activities of mythological heroes, creating a mythological picture of the world that is not limited in time. Thirdly, the archetypal plot cliché unites the semantic and meaningful space of the myth and it is its valuesemantic core.

Keywords: genre, medical myth, archetype, framing, metaphor, semantic and meaningful space, values

References:

1. Statkevich I.A. Vospriimchivost’ cheloveka i dukhovnyye osobennosti istseleniya yego organizma [Human susceptibility and spiritual features of healing his body]. Trudy molodykh uchyonykh i spetsialistov [Works of young scientists and specialists]. Cheboksary, Chuvash State University Publ., 2001. Pp. 57–60 (in Russian).

2. Statkevich I.A. Fenomenologiya i sushchnost’ suggestii. Misticheskaya i nauchnaya yeyo interpretatsiya [Phenomenology and the essence of suggestion. Mystical and scientific interpretation]. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov kafedry kompleksnykh issledovaniy po filosofii [Collection of scientific papers of the Department of Complex Research in Philosophy]. Cheboksary, Chuvash State University Publ., 2002. Pp. 58–66 (in Russian).

3. Subotyalova A.M., Subotyalov M.A. Meditsinskiye upominaniya v epicheskikh proizvedeniyakh Drevney Indii (“Ramayana” i “Makhabkharata”) [Medical references in the epic works of Ancient India (Ramayana and Mahabharata)]. Science for Education Today, 2019, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 96–103 (in Russian).

4. Karomatov I.D., Gulyamov Kh.Zh. Meditsinskiye voprosy, osveshchennyye v Biblii [Medical Issues Covered in the Bible]. Biologiya i integrativnaya meditsina -Biology and Integrative Medicine, 2017, no. 4, pp. 180–186 (in Russian).

5. Stepanova E.S. Semantika mifa o rozhdenii kak kul’turnyy kod [Semantics of the Birth Myth as a Cultural Code]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika – RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 2024, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 292–304 (in Russian). doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2024-15-1-292-304

6. Stepanova E.S. Mify o chudesnykh istseleniyakh: lingvisticheskiye i aksiologicheskiye aspekty [Myths about miraculous healings: linguistic and axiological aspects]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika – Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: Linguistics, 2022, no. 1, pp. 24–32 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X-2022-1-24-32

7. Boldyrev N.N. Kognitivnaya semantika [Cognitive semantics]. Tambov, Tambovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., 2000. 123 p. (in Russian).

8. Shcherbak A.S. Osnovnyye tipy onomasticheskikh kontseptov (na materiale regional’noy kontseptosfery) [Main types of onomastic concepts (based on the regional conceptual sphere)]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnyye nauki – Bulletin of Tambov University. Series: Humanities, 2009, no. 10, pp. 169–175 (in Russian).

9. Stepanova E.S. Linguistic and Cognitive Aspects of Medical Myths in American Works of Fiction. The International Journal of Communication and Linguistic Studies, 2021, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 65–72. DOI: 10.18848/2327-7882/CGP/v19i01/65-72

10. Karasik V.I. Yazykovaya spiral’: tsennosti, znaki, motivy [Language spiral: values, signs, motives]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2019. 424 p. (in Russian).

11. Torah: the five books of Moses. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, Varda Books. 2001. 638 p.

12. Vladimirova T.E. Semanticheskiy kontinuum mifa [The Semantic Continuum of Myth]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika – RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 2020, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 161–174 (in Russian). doi: 10.22363/2313-2299-2020-11-2-161-174

13. Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa [Dialectics of myth]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2021. 448 p. (in Russian).

14. Meletinskiy E.M. Poetika mifa [Poetics of myth]. Saint Petersburg, Azbuka Publ., 2018. 480 p. (in Russian).

15. Frank-Kamenetskiy I.G. K voprosu o razvitii poeticheskoy metafory [On the development of poetic metaphor]. Ot slova k smyslu: Problemy tropogeneza [From Word to Meaning: Problems of Tropogenesis]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2001. Pp. 28–80 (in Russian).

16. Kassirer E. Sila metafory [The power of metaphor]. In: Arutyunova N.D., Zhurinskiy M.A. (ed). Teoriya metafory [Theory of Metaphor]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. Pp. 33–43 (in Russian).

17. Burgers Ch., Konijn E.A., Steen G.J. Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony. Communication Theory, 2016, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 410–430.

18. Kushnirenko A.A. Semantika komponentov arkhetipicheskogo kompleksa literaturnogo proizvedeniya [Semantics of the components of the archetypal complex of a literary work]. Nauka i sovremennost’ – Science and modernity, 2010, no. 2-3, pp. 132–135 (in Russian).

19. Vladimirova T.E. Semanticheskiy potentsial slova: na materiale mifologemy svyashchennogo braka Neba i Zemli [The semantic potential of the word: based on the mythologem of the sacred marriage of Heaven and Earth]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika – RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 2022, vol. 13, no 2, pp. 294–306 (in Russian). doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-2-294-306

20. Karasik V.I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2002. 476 p. (in Russian).

stepanova_elena_sergeyevna_67_75_6_242_2025.pdf ( 450.12 kB ) stepanova_elena_sergeyevna_67_75_6_242_2025.zip ( 445.91 kB )

Issue: 6, 2025

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: APPLIED LINGUISTICS

Pages: 67 — 75

Downloads: 199

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU