The confrontational communicative threat tactics in Nancy Pelosi’s speeches and interviews
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2026-1-35-42
This article investigates the confrontational communicative threat tactics in Nancy Pelosi’s public speeches and interviews who was the Speaker of the US House of Representatives, from 2019 to 2023. In the context of increasing political polarization and the growing mediatization of power, the speech practices of leaders have become a strategic tool of influence aimed at opponents, allies, and the mass audience. In this framework, a threat is not merely an expression of aggression but an institutionally legitimized speech act combining the functions of warning, pressure, and mobilization. The theoretical foundation of the study is based on the principles of speech act theory, the concept of face-threatening acts, and the theory of the institutional legitimization of speech strategies. The research material consisted of 33 public speeches and interviews by Nancy Pelosi, published as press releases and television interviews. The methods of discourse analysis, conteny analysis, and contextual and linguistic-stylistic analysis were applied. The results show that the threat tactics is a systematic element of Pelosi’s political rhetoric, aimed at strengthening her institutional authority and consolidating the electorate. The texts revealed 134 quotes containing threats, where 43 quotes (32 %) were explicit and 91 quotes (68 %) were implicit. Explicit threats are implemented through modal verbs of obligation (will, must, shall), vocabulary of sanctions (punish, sanction, hold accountable), directive constructions, and metaphors of retribution (price to pay, train coming after you). Implicit threats are expressed through conditional constructions (if…then), negative forms (we cannot allow), institutional references, and morally evaluative vocabulary (undermines our democracy, endangers our Constitution). It is concluded that the predominance of implicit threats reflects a strategy of “democratic deterrence”, typical for Nancy Pelosi’s speech. This strategy combines decisiveness and legal rigor with rhetorical politeness and democratic correctness, allowing to use the threat as a a tool of institutional pressure, moral leadership, and maintaining political balance in the context of confrontational communication.
Keywords: political communication, threat tactics, confrontation, explicit threat, implicit threat, Nancy Pelosi
References:
1. Burmakova E.A., Polyakova N.V. Kombinirovannyye taktiki, realizuyushchiye rechepovedencheskuyu strategiyu diskreditatsii administratsii D. Baydena: na materiale peredachi Tucker Carlson Tonight [Combined tactics implementing the speechbehavioural strategy of discrediting the Biden administration: based on the Tucker Carlson Tonight show]. SibScript, 2024, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 62–71 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21603/sibscript-2024-26-1-62-71
2. Zyubina I. A. Aktualizatsiya konfrontatsii v politicheskom diskurse [Actualization of confrontation in political discourse]. Yurislingvistika – Legal Lingustics, 2023, no. 27, pp. 118–123 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.14258/leglin (2023)2721
3. Baldina A., Kabanova I. Means of Verbalization of the Concept Threat in English Media Discourse. Yazyk v sfere professional’noy kommunikatsii: sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy koferentsii prepodavateley, aspirantov i studentov (Yekaterinburg, 28 aprelya 2022 g.) [Language in the sphere of professional communication: collection of materials of the international scientific-practical conference of teachers, postgraduates and students (Yekaterinburg, April 28, 2022)]. Yekaterinburg, Azhur Publ., 2022. Pp. 207–213.
4. Searle J.R. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 1979. 187 p.
5. Brown P., Levinson S.C. Politness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 1987. 345 p.
6. Issers O.S. Kommunikativnyye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi [Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech]. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2017. 308 p. (in Russian).
7. Jamieson K.H., Taussig D. The Rhetorical Signature of Donald J. Trump. Political Science Quarterly. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017–18, vol. 132 (4), pp. 619–650.
8. Charteris-Black J. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Springer, 2011. 370 p.
9. Van Dijk T.A. Ideology and Discourse: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London, SAGE Publ., 1998. 384 p.
10. Fraser B. Threatening revisited. Forensic Linguistics. Equinox Publishing, 1998, vol. 5 (2), pp. 159–173. DOI: 10.1558/sll.1998.5.2.159
11. Walton D. Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats. Springer Netherlands, 2000. 218 p.
12. Kalinina M.A., Kalinina M.V. Rechevaya agressia v publitsisticheskom diskurse (na materiale rossiyskikh politicheskikh tokshou) [Verbal aggression in publicistic discourse (by the material of Russian political talk shows)]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 2020, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 24–27 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2020.4.4
13. Austin J.L. Kak sovershit’ deystviya pri pomoshchi slov. Izbrannoye [How to do things with words. Selected works]. Moscow, Ideya-press; Dom intellektual’noy knigi Publ., 1999. 332 p. (in Russian).
14. Apresyan V.Yu. Implitsitnaya agressiya v yazyke [Implicit aggression in a languge]. Komp’yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual’nye tekhnologii: trudy Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii ”Dialog 2010” [Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies: Proceedings of the International Conference “Dialogue 2010”]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2010. Pp. 32–35 (in Russian).
15. Pelosi N. Transcript of Pelosi Interview on MSNBC’s All In with Chris Hayes. URL: https://pelosi.house.gov/news/press-releases/transcript-of-pelosi-interview-on-msnbc-s-all-in-with-chris-hayes-7?clckid=b5e21c42 (accessed 9 October 2025).
16. Pelosi N. Floor Speech on Legislative Package to Hold Beijing Accountable for Human Rights Abuses. URL: https://pelosi.house.gov/news/press-releases/floor-speech-on-legislative-package-to-hold-beijing-accountable-for-humanrights?clckid=3b4cfed5 (accessed 9 October 2025).
17. Pelosi N. Transcript of Nancy Pelosi’s Remarks at Weekly Press Conference. URL: https://pelosi.house.gov/news/press-releases/transcript-of-speaker-pelosi-s-remarks-at-weekly-press-conference-5?clckid=8c9f8169 (accessed 9 October 2025).
18. Pelosi N. Pelosi Statement on GAO Finding that Trump Broke the Law by Withholding Aid to Ukraine. URL: https://pelosi.house.gov/news/press-releases/pelosi-statement-on-gao-finding-that-trump-broke-the-law-by-withholding-aid-to?clckid=379b0aa0 (accessed 9 October 2025).
19. Pelosi N. Pelosi Statement on President Biden Signing Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. URL: https://pelosi.house.gov/news/press-releases/pelosi-statement-on-president-biden-signing-uyghur-forced-labor-prevention-act?clckid=a88795b1 (accessed 9 October 2025).
20. Pelosi N. Transcript of Pelosi Interview on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos. URL: https://pelosi.house.gov/news/press-releases/transcript-of-pelosi-interview-on-abcs-this-week-with-george-stephanopoulos-4?clckid=18796b76 (accessed 9 October 2025).
( 393.38 kB ) 
( 389.33 kB )
Issue: 1, 2026
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: APPLIED LINGUISTICS
Pages: 35 — 42
Downloads: 109