Metaphorical modeling of the enemy image in the presidential discourse of Javier Milei
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2026-1-43-51
Nowadays, the discourse of power has to constantly transform due to the rapidly changing socio-political context. At the same time, metaphors still remain an effective means of speech influence that transmits political views and values, forms public opinion, constructs a positive image of a politician and discriminates against his opponents. The dominant function of a political metaphor is an emotional and expressive impact on the audience, which helps to form a positive or negative attitude towards certain political subjects or phenomena. In the present article we assume the mediating function of language while conceptualizing reality. The struggle for power and its retention is one of the main functions of political discourse. In this process, the conceptual opposition “we – they” plays an important role as it is able to construct the positive image of a politician, transmit his ideological views and denigrate his opponents. This opposition is often expressed by metaphors, which are traditionally perceived as a means of speech influence and as a way of constructing reality in institutional and non-institutional political communication. The purpose of the article is to study the metaphorical modeling of the enemy image in the public discourse of Argentine President Javier Milei based on his official speeches from 2023 to 2025. The linguopragmatic analysis of the texts has shown that socialism and woke ideology, the caste model, corruption and crime represent enemies, while the Argentine president with his radical methods seems to be a “savior”. With the help of traditional as well as new metaphorical models, created by the president, the dichotomous opposition “we – they” achieves the following goals: a) to unify the nation in accordance with common axiological values; b) to create a positive image of the speaker; c) to negatively describe the past and his predecessors; d) to explain the reasons for the country’s backwardness, and e) to restructure the perception of the world.
Keywords: presidential discourse, institutional discourse, public speeches, Argentine president, metaphors
References:
1. Korenetskaya I.N. Metaforicheskiye modeli kontseptual’noy diady “svoy – chuzhoy” v raznykh tipakh diskursa (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [Metaphorical models of the conceptual opposition “us – they” in different types of discourse (by the material of the English Language)]. Voprosy zhurnalistiki, pedagogiki, yazykoznaniya – Issues in Journalism, Education, Linguistics, 2020, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 569–577 (in Russian).
2. Kotov B.S. Metafora kak sredstvo sozdaniya “obraza vraga” v gazetnykh tekstakh (na primere obrazov Avstro-Vengrii i Germanii v russkoy presse kanuna Pervoy mirovoy voyny) [Metaphor as a means of creating the “image of the enemy” in newspaper texts: Austria-Hungary and Germany in the Russian press before the First World War]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12. Politicheskiye nauki – Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 12: Political Science, 2014, no. 1, pp. 94–110 (in Russian).
3. Molodychenko E.N. “Svoi” i “chuzhiye” v politicheskom diskurse: instrumental’naya funktsiya “chuzhogo” v amerikanskoy prezidentskoy ritorike [“Us” vs “them” in políticas discourse: the instrumental function of the “evil other” in American presidential rhetoric]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya – Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2019, no. 59, pp. 67–86 (in Russian).
4. Alieva T.V. Oppozitsiya “svoy – chuzhoy” v angloyazychnoy presse: leksicheskiye sredstva vyrazheniya [Opposition “we – they” in the English-speaking press: lexical means of representation (political terms, euphemisms, dysphemisms)]. Vestnik MGIMO – Vestnik MGIMO University, 2012, no. 3, pp. 182–187 (in Russian).
5. Alieva T.V. Metafora kak sredstvo aktualizatsii kontsepta “chuzhoy” v britanskom politicheskom diskurse [Metaphors as representation of the concept “they” in the British political discourse]. MAGIJA INNO: novoye v issledovanii yazyka i metodike ego prepodavaniya. Materialy Vtoroy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Moskva, 24–25 aprelya 2015 g.) – MAGIA INNO: new in language research and teaching methods. Proceedings of the Second scientific and practical conference (Moscow, April 24–25, 2015), vol. 1, 2015, pp. 137–141 (in Russian)
6. Kushnereva D.A. Metafora kak yazykovoy instrument formirovaniya obraza vraga v zhenskom politicheskom diskurse Argentiny [Metaphor as a language instrument for shaping an enemy image in women’s political discourse in Argentina]. Uchenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University, 2025, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 80–86 (in Russian).
7. Chudinov A.P. Ocherki po sovremennoy politicheskoy metaforologii [Essays on modern political metaphorology]. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical University Publ., 2013. 176 p. (in Russian).
8. Bondarenko I.V. Lingvopragmaticheskiy potentsial metafory v politicheskom vystuplenii [Linguistic and pragmatic potential of metaphor in political speech]. Vestnik Baltiyskogo federal’nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta – Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University I. Kant. Ser.: Philology, Pedagogy, Psychology, 2019, no. 2, pp. 52–60 (in Russian).
9. Brusenskaya L.А., Kulikova E.G. Animalisticheskaya metafora v sovremennom politicheskom mediadiskurse [Animalistic metaphor in the modern political media discourse]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika – Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 10: Journalism, 2022, no. 6, pp. 87–108 (in Russian).
10. Ches N.A. Kontseptual’naya metafora v politicheskom mediadiskurse (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [Conceptual metaphor in English language political media discourse]. Moscow, MGIMO University Publ., 2020. 190 p. (in Russian).
11. Vyrovtseva E.V., Nekrasov I.O., Timofeeva A.A. Politicheskaya metafora v sovremennom mediadiskurse: opyt tipologii [Political metaphor in modern media discourse: typology experience]. Izvestija UrFU. Serija 1. Problemy obrazovanija, nauki i kul’tury – Izvestia Ural federal university journal. Series 1, Issues in education, science and culture, 2024, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 5–23 (in Russian).
12. Galeeva T.I., Kaziakhmedova S.H., Bogatyreva S.N. Morbial’naya metafora kak sposob osmysleniya kontsepta “terrorizm” v politicheskom diskurse [Morbial metaphor as a way to conceptualize “terrorism” in political discourse]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i filologiya – Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series of History and Philology, 2016, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 93–101 (in Russian).
13. Raevskaya M.M., Selivanova I.V. Pragmaticheskiy potentsial metafory v publichnom vystuplenii (na materiale rozhdestvenskikh rechey ispanskogo monarkha Huana Karlosa I) [Pragmatic potential of metaphor in public speaking (Christmas speeches of the Spanish monarch Juan Carlos I)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universita. Seriya 19: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya – Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 19: Linguistics and intercultural communication, 2020, no. 3, pp. 52–59 (in Russian).
14. Raevskaya M.M., Selivanova I.V. Metaforicheskoye modelirovaniye deystvitel’nosti v publichnom diskurse ispanskogo monarkha Filippa VI [Metaphorical modeling of reality in public discourse of the Spanish monarch Felipe VI]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya – Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2023, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 131–144 (in Russian).
15. Raevskaya M.M. Diskurs vlasti v sovremennom mire: sotsial’no-oriyentirovannaya kommunikatsiya ispanskoy monarkhii [The discourse of power in the modern world: socially oriented communication of the Spanish monarchy]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 19: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya – Bulletin of Moscow Universtiy. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2021, no. 4, pp. 95–108 (in Russian).
16. Selivanova I.V. Funktsii metafory pri osveshchenii politicheskikh sobytiy (na materiale pressy) [The functions of metaphor regarding political events (following the analysis of the Spanish press)]. Izvestiya UrFU. Ser. 1, Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul’tury – Izvestia Ural Federal University Journal. Series 1, Issues in education, science and culture, 2019, vol. 25, no. 2 (186), pp. 74–81. (in Russian).
17. Moiseenko L.V. Populistskiy politicheskiy diskurs: diagnosticheskiye priznaki i lingvokognitivnyye priyomy sozdaniya [Populism in political discourse: diagnostic features and linguocognitive techniques of formation]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznaniye – Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 2019, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 105–117 (in Russian).
18. Bocharov E.V. Strategiya samoprezentatsii i rechevyye taktiki v politicheskom diskurse (na materiale publichnykh vystupleniy politikov Latinskoy Ameriki v OON) [Self-presentation strategy and speech tactics in political discourse (based on the public speeches of Latin American politicians at the UN)]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya – Vestnik NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2024, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 120–131 (in Russian).
( 435.16 kB ) 
( 430.51 kB )
Issue: 1, 2026
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: ROMANCE AND GERMANIC LANGUAGES
Pages: 43 — 51
Downloads: 117