Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 26.03.2026
Home Issues 2026 Year Issue №2 Individual educational trajectory as a key element of personalization of education in the training of future teachers at the university
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Individual educational trajectory as a key element of personalization of education in the training of future teachers at the university

Bykova S.S.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2026-2-128-138

Information About Author:

Bykova S.S., Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Vyatka State University (ul. Moskovskaya, 36, Kirov, Russian Federation, 610000). E-mail: usr11603@vyatsu.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2382-0496; SPIN-code: 7275-2219; Scopus Author ID: 57147687700; Researcher ID: S-5241-2018.

Personalization of education with the ability for students to build an individual educational trajectory taking into account their professional interests is one of the priority areas for improving the higher education system. This area is supported by regulatory documents that set the task of improving the quality of training of teaching staff in the domestic education system. Scientific literature covers issues related to the essence of different learning models, features and characteristics of building individual educational trajectories, however, the practice of implementing these theoretical ideas in the training of future teachers is insufficiently presented. The purpose of the article is to present the practice of using an individual educational trajectory as the main element of personalization of education in the training of future teachers at a university. Main objectives: a) to determine the specifics of personalized education in the context of professional training; b) to study the experience of designing individual educational trajectories at Vyatka State University; c) to present interim conclusions on the use of personalized education at a university. The article describes the experience of implementing a new model for training future teachers with the construction of an individual educational trajectory that takes into account the professional needs of each student. The main areas of designing individual educational trajectories are considered: content (an educational program built on the principle of “block-modular integration”: “core” disciplines, specialized, individually and practice-oriented academic disciplines; non-linear organization of the educational process due to a combination of disciplines from different blocks in the curricula), activity-based (innovative teaching technologies, including the use of rhizome-like learning to compensate for transitions from one trajectory to another; the educational environment of the university as a stimulating factor for the activity of the student himself) and processual (practical training of students in the process of implementing educational and industrial practices, as well as in the process of studying theoretical disciplines). The described experience can be taken into account when developing educational programs for training future teachers, and also used when designing a passport of student competencies (functional portrait).

Keywords: personalization of education, individual educational trajectory, design, learning models, future teacher

References:

1. Kontseptsiya podgotovki pedagogicheskikh kadrov dlya sistemy obrazovaniya na period do 2030 goda: rasporyazheniye Pravitel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24 iyunya 2022 g. No. 1688-r [The concept of training teaching staff for the education system for the period up to 2030: Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of June 24, 2022 No. 1688-r] (in Russian). URL: http://government.ru/docs/all/141781/ (accessed 04 July 2025).

2. Astaf’eva E.N. Traditsii i innovatsii v obrazovanii: vzglyad rossiyskikh uchenykh (2000-e – 2010-e gg.) [Traditions and Innovations in Education: The View of Russian Scientists (2000s – 2010s)]. Istoriko-pedagogicheskiy zhurnal – Historical and pedagogical journal, 2019, no. 4, pp. 139–151 (in Russian).

3. Kornetov G.B. Natsional’nyy proekt “Obrazovaniye”: innovatsionnyy kontekst [National project “Education”: innovative context]. Innovatsionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii – Innovative projects and programs in education, 2019, no. 5, pp. 6–14 (in Russian).

4. Bayborodova L.V. Individualizatsiya obrazovatel’nogo protsessa v shkole [Individualization of the educational process at school]. Yaroslavl, YAGPU Publ., 2011. 281 p. (in Russian).

5. Selevko G.K. Pedagogicheskiye tekhnologii na osnove aktivizatsii, intensifikatsii i effektivnogo upravleniya UVP [Pedagogical technologies based on activation, intensification and effective management of educational and methodological programs]. Moscow, Research Institute of School Technologies Publ., 2005. 208 p. (in Russian).

6. Serikov V.V. K sozdaniyu teorii lichnostno-razvivayushego obrazovaniya: poisk metodologicheskikh osnov [Towards the creation of a theory of personal development education: the search for methodological foundations]. In: Kraevskiy V.V., Polonskiy V.M. (eds.). Pedagogicheskaya nauka i eye metodologiya v kontekste sovremennosti [Pedagogical science and its methodology in the context of modernity]. Moscow, 2001. pp. 109–115 (in Russian).

7. Alekseev N.A. Lichnostno orientirovannoye obucheniye: voprosy teorii i praktiki: uchebnoyye posobiye [Student-centered learning: issues of theory and practice]. Tyumen, Tyumen State University Publ., 1997. 216 p (in Russian).

8. Zeer E.F., Stepanova L.N. Akmeologicheskaya tekhnologiya prognozirovaniya individual’nykh professional’no orientirovannykh traektoriy razvitiya lichnosti studentov [Acmeological technology of forecasting individual professional-oriented trajectories of students’ personality development]. Obrazovaniye i nauka – The Education and science journal, 2023, no. 25(6), pp. 69–98 (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-6-69-99

9. Zeer E.F. Teoretiko-prikladnye osnovaniya personalizirovannogo obrazovaniya: perspektivy razvitiya [Theoretical and applied foundations of personalized education: development prospects]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Pedagogical education in Russia, 2021, no. 1, pp. 17–25. doi: 10.12345/2079-8717_2021_01_02

10. Isupova T.N., Mozharova T.N., Chaplygina E.V. Vozmozhnosti tablichnogo protsessora dlya razvitiya logicheskogo myshleniya budushchikh pedagogov v ramkakh novoy modeli obucheniya [Possibilities of a spreadsheet processor for developing logical thinking of future teachers within the framework of a new learning model]. Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronny zhurnal “Kontsept” – Scientific and methodological electronic journal “Concept”, 2024, no. 5, pp. 189–207 (in Russian).

11. Yakimanskaya I.S. Trebovaniya k uchebnym programmam, orientirovannym na lichnostnoe razvitie shkol’nikov [Requirements for educational programs focused on the personal development of schoolchildren]. Voprosy psikhologii – Questions of Psychology, 1994, no. 2, pp. 64–67 (in Russian). URL: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1994/942/942064.htm (accessed 12 June 2025).

12. Konanchuk D.S. EdTech: novaya tekhnologicheskaya platforma v obrazovanii [EdTech: a new technological platform in education]. Universitetskoye obrazovaniya: praktika i analiz – University education: practice and analysis, 2013, no. 5 (87), pp. 65–73 (in Russian).

13. Basyuk V.S. K voprosu o jadre pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija v klassicheskom universitete [On the issue of the core of pedagogical education in a classical university]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 20: Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye – Moscow University Bulletin. Series 20: Pedagogical Education, 2023, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 7–27. doi: 10.55959/MSU2073-2635-2023-21-3-7-27

14. Oosterbeek H., Patrinos H.A. Financing lifelong learning. Empirical Res Voc. Ed Train 1. 2009. Р. 19–37. doi: 10.1007/BF03546478

15. Yasvin V.A. Obrazovatel’naya sreda: ot modelirovaniya k proektirovaniyu [Educational environment: from modeling to design]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2010. 368 p. (in Russian).

16. Shepel’ V.M. Imedzhelogiya. Sekrety lichnogo obayaniya [Imageology. Secrets of personal charm]. Moscow, Kul’tura i sport, UNITY Publ., 1994. p. 320 (in Russian).

17. Klimov E.A. O srede obitaniya cheloveka glazami psikhologa (1996) – privetstviye pri otkrytii 1-y Rossiyskoy konferentsii po ekologicheskoy psikhologii (3–5 dekabrya 1996 g.) [About the human habitat through the eyes of a psychologist (1996) – Opening Address of the 1st Russian Conference on Environmental Psychology (December 3–5, 1996)]. In: 2-ya Rossiyskaya konferentsiya po ekologicheskoy psikhologii: materialy (Moskva, 12–14 aprelya 2000 g.). [Proceedings of the 2nd Russian Conference on Environmental Psychology (Moscow, April 12–14, 2000)]. Ed. V.I. Panov Moscow, Samara, MGPPI Publ., 2001. pp. 7–9 (in Russian).

18. Slobodchikov V.I. Ocherki psikhologii obrazovaniya [Essays on the Psychology of Education]. Birobidzhan, BSPI Publ., 2005. 270 p. (in Russian).

19. Berulava G.A., Berulava M.M. Issledovaniya stereotipov psikhicheskoy aktivnosti lichnosti v psikhologii [Research of stereotypes of mental activity of personality in psychology]. Gumanizatsiya obrazovaniya – Humanization of education, 2017, no. 6, pp. 4–17 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovaniya-stereotipov-psihicheskoy-aktivnosti-lichnosti-v-psihologii (accessed 21 July 2025).

20. Klochko V.E., Galazhinsky E.V. Psikhologiya innovatsionnogo povedeniya [Psychology of innovative behaviour]. Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., 2009. 240 p. (in Russian). URL: https://www.studmed.ru/klochko-ve-galazhinskiy-ev-psihologiya-innovacionnogo-povedeniya_bc6a6864664.html (accessed 06 June 2025).

21. Elkina I.M. O novykh didakticheskikh kontseptakh: rizomopodobnoye obucheniye [On new didactic concepts: rhizome-like learning]. Filosofskiye nauki – Philosophical sciences, 2016., no. (11), pp. 82–95 (in Russian).

22. Thomas, Doug & John Seely Brown. A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Create Space: Kindle, 2011. 37 p. URL: https://scispace.com/pdf/a-new-culture-of-learning-cultivating-the-imagination-for-a-3c5343r1uh.pdf (accessed 04 July 2025).

bykova_s.s._128_138_2_244_2026.pdf ( 2.29 MB ) bykova_s.s._128_138_2_244_2026.zip ( 2.1 MB )

Issue: 2, 2026

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: METHODOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION

Pages: 128 — 138

Downloads: 3

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU