Monitoring the effectiveness of interactive educational resources: based on the cognitive training platform material
DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2026-2-65-74
The paper highlights the issue of the insufficient development of diagnostic tools that allow for a comprehensive expert evaluation of interactive educational resources in the scientific and educational space of higher education institutions. The research objective was to substantiate and develop criteria-based indicators for interactive resources used in university teaching processes. The methodological basis of the study included conceptual provisions from theories on modeling in education, forecasting, simulation, and design of educational systems. A set of research methods was implemented: literature analysis, pedagogical modeling, surveying, testing, and pedagogical experimentation. The paper presents a monitoring model designed to assess the effectiveness of interactive educational resources. The model includes the following criteria: communicative interaction potential, student learning level, motivation towards studying academic subjects, critical assessment and selection of necessary information, audience coverage, personalization possibilities, performance indicators, and corresponding diagnostic instruments. The paper proposes both qualitative (lexical analysis of students’ responses and comments, case studies) and quantitative (tests, number of learners) evaluation methods within this framework. The model enables assessment of the educational potential of an interactive resource, its efficiency in the teaching process, and provides forecasts regarding possible transformations. The paper describes the process of model validation for which materials from the interactive cognitive training platform “Emotional Intelligence for Teachers” hosted on the open educational platform Stepik (https://stepik.org/course/251424/promo) were used. The paper provides the results of assessing the cognitive training platform “Emotional Intelligence for Teachers” by means of the discussed model. The gathered data shows that the initial monitoring can analyze cognitive, motivational, productive, activity, reflexive, and organizational components. Conclusions about the educational potential of digital resources based on clearly defined measurable components have been drawn. The paper states that the use of the monitoring model with established criteria and indicators serves as an effective tool for evaluating and optimizing the utilization of interactive resources in university instruction. Validation of these criteria and indicators through the example of the cognitive trainer confirmed their practical applicability and validity for assessing the educational potential of interactive resources.
Keywords: interactive educational resources, effectiveness monitoring, criteria indicators, diagnostic tools, cognitive training platform, educational potential
References:
1. Vindeker O.S. K voprosu ob effektivnosti distantsionnogo obucheniya: issledovaniye predstavleniy [On the Question of the Effectiveness of Distance Learning: A Study of Perceptions]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2017, no. 10, pp. 41–7 (in Russian).
2. Mikheykina L.A. Osobennosti formirovaniya metodiki izmereniya i otsenki tsifrovogo potentsiala subyektov Rossii v obrazovatel’noy sfere [Features of Forming a Methodology for Measuring and Evaluating the Digital Potential of Russian Regions in the Educational Sphere]. Osobennosti sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona: pravovye, upravlencheskiye, sotsial’no-gumanitarnye aspekty: sbornik nauchnykh statey [Features of the socio-economic development of the region: legal, managerial, social and humanitarian aspects: a collection of scientific articles]. Cheboksary, ChSPU Publ., 2023. Pp. 477–485 (in Russian).
3. Khadzhalova H.M., Savzikhanova S.E. Teoretiko-metodicheskiye aspekty otsenki obrazovatel’nogo potentsiala [Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Assessing Educational Potential]. UEPS: upravleniye, ekonomika, politika, sotsiologiya, 2022, no. 4, pp. 66–70 (in Russian).
4. Schepalina A.I., Balahonov E.A., Zjuzin S.A. Otsenka obrazovatel’nykh vozmozhnostey i prikladnogo potentsiala ChatGPT [Assessment of Educational Opportunities and Applied Potential of ChatGPT]. In: Kooperatsiya nauki i obshhestva – put’ k modernizatsii i innovatsionnomu razvitiyu: sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Cooperation between Science and Society – the Path to Modernization and Innovative Development: A Collection of Articles from the International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Ufa, Aeterna Publ., 2024. Pp. 68–71 (in Russian).
5. Shakirova D.M. Kriterii otsenki intellektual’nogo i obrazovatel’nogo potentsialov v informatsionnom obshchestve [Criteria for Evaluating Intellectual and Educational Potential in the Information Society]. Obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii i obshhestvo, 2010, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 445–455 (in Russian).
6. Selezneva N.A. Kachestvo vysshego obrazovaniya kak ob’’yekt sistemnogo issledovaniya [Quality of Higher Education as an Object of Systemic Research]. Moscow, Issledovatel’skiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov Publ., 2008. 95 p. (in Russian).
7. Subetto A.I. Kontseptual’no-teoreticheskiye osnovy resheniya problemy kachestva obrazovaniya v Rossii [Conceptual and Theoretical Foundations for Solving the Problem of the Quality of Education in Russia]. Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal – Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2008, no. 1, pp. 75–87 (in Russian).
8. Verbitskaya N.O. Informatsionno-analiticheskiy metod otsenki osvoeniya znaniy kak faktor povysheniya effektivnosti upravleniya obrazovatel’nym protsessom v shkole. Avtoref. dis. kand. ped. nauk [Information-Analytical Method of Assessing Knowledge Acquisition as a Factor in Improving the Efficiency of Educational Process Management at School. Abstract of thesis cand. ped. sci.]. Ekaterinburg, 1998. 20 p. (in Russian).
9. Drantusova N.V., Knyazev E.A. Otsenka kachestva kak neobkhodimyy element (etap) upravleniya v vysshem obrazovanii [Quality Assessment as a Necessary Element (Stage) of Management in Higher Education]. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz, 1999, no. 1, pp. 42–44 (in Russian).
10. Kamyshnikova T.V. Kvalimetricheskiy podkhod v teorii otsenki i upravleniya kachestvom obrazovaniya [Qualimetric Approach in the Theory of Assessment and Quality Management of Education]. Izvestiya TRTU, 1999, no. 2 (12), pp. 254–255 (in Russian).
11. Andrusenko E.Yu. et al. Problema effektivnosti informacionnykh tekhnologiy v obrazovanii [The Problem of the Effectiveness of Information Technologies in Education]. Sovremennyy uchenyy, 2021, no. 6, pp. 180–184 (in Russian).
12. Krivogornitsyna O.S., Kalinin N.V. Otsenka effektivnosti ispol’zovaniya elektronnykh obrazovatel’nykh sistem v korporativnom obuchenii [Evaluating the Effectiveness of Using Electronic Educational Systems in Corporate Training]. Nauchnye issledovaniya studentov v reshenii aktual’nykh problem APK: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Irkutsk, 4–5 marta 2021 g.) [Student research in solving pressing problems of the agro-industrial complex: Proceedings of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference (Irkutsk, March 4–5, 2021)]. 2021. Vol. 2. Pp. 71–76 (in Russian).
13. Dolzhenko R.A. Opyt otsenki effektivnosti obucheniya v korporativnom universitete Sberbanka [Experience in Evaluating the Effectiveness of Training in the Corporate University of Sberbank]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics, 2018, no. 42, pp. 161–179 (in Russian).
14. Gorb V.G. Metodologiya i teoriya pedagogicheskogo monitoringa v vuze. Avtoref. dis. dokt. ped. nauk [Methodology and Theory of Pedagogical Monitoring in Higher Education. Abstract of thesis cand. ped. sci.]. Ekaterinburg, 2005. 56 p. (in Russian).
15. Matveeva S.E. Pedagogicheskiy monitoring innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti v sisteme “Shkola – ssuz – vuz”. Avtoref. dis. dokt. ped. nauk [Pedagogical Monitoring of Innovative Activity in the “School-College-University” System. Abstract of thesis doct. ped. sci.]. Kazan’, 2011. 43 p. (in Russian).
16. Abakumova N.N., Krasnik Yu.V. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye osnovaniya razrabotki modeli monitoringa effektivnosti interaktivnykh resursov v nauchno-obrazovatel’nom prostranstve vuza [Psychological and Pedagogical Foundations for Developing a Model for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Interactive Resources in the Scientific and Educational Space of a University]. Rossiyskaya nauka v sovremennom mire. Sbornik statey LXXI mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Moskva, 15 iyulya 2025 goda [Russian Science in the Modern World: Collection of Articles from the LXXI International Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, July 15, 2025]. Moscow, OOO AKTUALNOST’ RF Publ., 2025. Pp. 153–155. EDN DYRGUP (in Russian).
17. Kalugina I.Yu. Obrazovatel’nye vozmozhnosti praktiko-orientirovannogo obucheniya uchashchikhsya. Avtoref. dis. kand. ped. nauk [Educational Opportunities of Practice-Oriented Learning for Students. Abstract of thesis cand. ped. sci.]. Ekaterinburg, 2000. 20 p. (in Russian).
18. Abakumova N.N. Printsipy organizatsii pedagogicheskogo monitoringa innovatsiy [Principles of Organizing Pedagogical Monitoring of Innovations]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, vol. 12 (140), pp. 135–139 (in Russian).
( 461.94 kB ) 
( 426.54 kB )
Issue: 2, 2026
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: GENERAL PEDAGOGY, HISTORY OF PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION
Pages: 65 — 74
Downloads: 10