Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 16.06.2026
Home Issues 2026 Year Issue №3 Documentalization and naturalization as vector strategies of the narrative structure in James Jones’s The Thin Red Line
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Documentalization and naturalization as vector strategies of the narrative structure in James Jones’s The Thin Red Line

Eplanov D.V., Volskiy A.L.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2026-3-110-117

Information About Author:

Eplanov D.V., Master of Philology, Applicant for the degree of Candidate of Sciences, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia (Naberezhnaya reki Moyki, 48, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191186). E-mail: e.denis2025@yandex.ru; ORCID: 0009-0006-0519-9487; SPIN-code: 5245-6535. Volsky A.L., Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Professor, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia (Naberezhnaya reki Moyki, 48, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191186). E-mail: volskij@mail.ru; ORCID: 0000-0002-2274-9667; SPIN-code: 5405-5838; RSCI AuthorID: 290757; Scopus ID: 57195835622.

The article examines how narrative strategies are realized in James Jones’s novel The Thin Red Line. The theoretical framework is V.I. Tyupa’s concept of narrative strategies, which makes it possible to reconstruct the internal organization of narration as a system of communicative intentions, modes of focalization, and regimes of representing experience. The analysis of the novel’s artistic structure reveals the interaction of two principal vectors – naturalization and documentalization – which jointly construct a multilayered model of wartime experience and configure a hybrid chronotope. The strategy of naturalization operates at the imagistic and descriptive levels: the text produces extreme material concreteness, topographically specifies the landscape and combat positions, and details weaponry, army routine, and a specific idiom; the transforming and traumatic experience is rendered both reflexively and through minute sensory notations. The characters’ interior discourse is organized as an alternation of interior monologue and free indirect discourse; the figure of the “reflective hero” functions as an instrument of selfobservation, self-splitting, and estrangement. The study underscores Jones’s continuity with the naturalist tradition in analyzing human behavior under extreme conditions, including motifs of determinism and the demythologization of the heroic. The strategy of documentalization is implemented through autobiographical elements, factual precision in reconstructing combat episodes, techniques of an “effect of presence,” and motif-thematic correlations with real events of the Second World War. The functions of the unreliable narrator and the image of a “collective hero” secure a plurality of perspectives, a polyphony of viewpoints, and a loosening of the linear chronotope. A cumulative type of narration and a montage-like composition shape a fragmentary, mosaic perception of events; temporal shifts, repetition, retardation, and shifts in angle intensify the effect of chaos and semantic indeterminacy. Throughout, the article argues that the synergy of naturalization and documentalization constitutes a structural invariant of Jones’s entire Army Trilogy, as corroborated by comparative observations on the other novels in the cycle. The conclusion substantiates the hybrid artistic structure of the novel (chronicle-like features, autobiographism, naturalist optics, elements of mythopoetics) and interprets Jones’s narrative strategy as a mode of comprehending wartime experience through narrative decentration, traumatic memory, and individualized consciousness, which aligns the text with key practices of postwar modernism.

Keywords: The Thin Red Line, James Jones, war prose, documentation, naturalization, narrative strategies

References:

1. Dzhundubayeva A.A. Narrativnyye strategii v postmodernistskoy proze. Dis. dokt. filol. nauk [Narrative Strategies in Postmodernist Prose. Diss. doc. philol. sci.]. Almaty, 2015. 151 p. (in Russian).

2. Tyupa V.I. Narrativnaya strategiya romana [Narrative Strategy of the Novel]. Novyy filologicheskiy vestnik – New Philological Bulletin, 2011, no. 3, pp. 8–24 (in Russian).

3. Tyupa V.I. Zhanrovaya priroda narrativnykh strategiy [The Genre Nature of Narrative Strategies]. Leydermanovskiye chteniya: estetika minimalizma [Leiderman Readings: The Aesthetics of Minimalism]. Moscow, GSN TI Publ., 2018. Pp. 19–24 (in Russian).

4. Chukuyeva Z.M. Dokument kak istochnik form khudozhestvennogo osmysleniya sobytiy [The Document as a Source of Artistic Forms for the Comprehension of Events]. Izvestiya DGPU. Obshchestvennyye i gumanitarnyye nauki, 2013, no. 4 (25), pp. 96–100 (in Russian).

5. Prokhorova T.G. Dokumental’nost’ kak khudozhestvennyy priyom (na materiale rossiiskoy prozy 2010-kh godov) [Documentality as an Artistic Device (Based on Russian Prose of the 2010s)]. Uchyonyye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnyye nauki – Kazan Journal of Historical, Linguistic, and Legal Research, 2017, no. 1, pp. 184–192 (in Russian).

6. Abasheva M.P., Aristov D.V. Voyennaya proza 1990–2000-kh godov: genezis i poetika [War Prose of the 1990s–2000s: Genesis and Poetics]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2010, vol. 8, pp. 133–137 (in Russian).

7. Ross M.S. James Jones’s Codes of Conduct. Las Vegas, University of Nevada, 2012. 250 p.

8. Khannanova Z.R. Frenk Norris: problema stilya i metoda; k voprosu o razvitii amerikanskogo naturalizma. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Frank Norris: The Problem of Style and Method; On the Development of American Naturalism. Diss. of philol. sci.]. Kazan, 2000. 199 p. (in Russian).

9. Shchukina V.A. Tip “vozlyubivshego armiyu” geroya v romane Dzh. Dzhonsa “Otnyne i vovek” [The “Army-Loving” Hero Type in J. Jones’s Novel “From Here to Eternity”]. Vestnik VyatGU – Herald of Vyatka State University, 2012, no. 2 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tip-vozlyubivshego-armiyu-geroya-v-romane-dzh-dzhonsa-otnyne-i-vovek (accessed 23 October 2025).

10. Blaskiewicz R. James Jones on Guadalcanal. War, Literature, and the Arts: An International Journal of the Humanities, 2008, no. 20, pp. 275–292.

11. Ternovaya L.O. Rozhdeniye antivoyennogo khudozhestvennogo manifesta v gody Pervoy mirovoy voyny [The Birth of the Antiwar Artistic Manifesto during the First World War]. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba, 2014, no. 4 (90), pp. 84–88 (in Russian).

12. MacShane F. Into Eternity: The Life of James Jones, American Writer. Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1985. 355 p.

13. Jones J. To Reach Eternity: The Letters of James Jones. Ed. by G. Hendrick. New York, Random House, 1989. 380 p.

14. Carter S.R. James Jones: An American Literary Orientalist Master. Urbana; Chicago, University of Illinois Press, 1998. 191 p.

15. Volkogonov D.A. Predisloviye [Preface]. Dzh. Dzhons. Tonkaya krasnaya liniya. Moscow, Voenizdat Publ., 1983. Pp. 3–11 (in Russian).

16. Jones J. The Thin Red Line. New York, Dell Publishing, 1998. 510 p.

17. Batoreo H.J. “There is only a Thin Red Line between the sane and the mad”: Mind, culture, language and metaphor. Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies. 2008. April. Pp. 111–126.

18. Fussell P. Wartime. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1990. 352 p.

19. Dzhons Dzh. Tonkaya krasnaya liniya [The Thin Red Line]. Translation form English A.F. Frolova. Moscow, Tsentrpoligraf Publ., 2002. 655 p. (in Russian).

eplanov_d.v._110_117_3_245_2026.pdf ( 440.13 kB ) eplanov_d.v._110_117_3_245_2026.zip ( 435.83 kB )

Issue: 3, 2026

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: RUSSIAN LITERATURE AND LITERATURE OF THE PEOPLES OF THE WORLD

Pages: 110 — 117

Downloads: 120

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU