Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 17.06.2026
Home Issues 2026 Year Issue №3 The linguistic norm of nowadays: constant and changing
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

The linguistic norm of nowadays: constant and changing

Borisova E.G., Biryukova E.V., Shatalova A.V.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2026-3-7-15

Information About Author:

Borisova E.G., Doctor of Philogical Sciences, Professor, Moscow City University (Vtoroy Sel’skokhozyaystvenny proyezd, korp. 1, Moscow, Russian Federation, 129226). E-mail: borisovaeg@mgpu.ru; ORCID: 0000-0003-3878-5344; SPIN-code: 6558-2284; Scopus Profile: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=56292342000. Biruykova E.V., Doctor of Philogical Sciences, Professor, Moscow City University (Vtoroy Sel’skokhozyaystvenny proyezd, korp. 1, Moscow, Russian Federation, 129226). E-mail: biryukovaev@mgpu.ru; ORCID: 0000-0001-8741-983X; SPIN-code: 2286-0141; Scopus Profile: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57195350492. Shatalova A.V., Candidate of Philological Sciences, Senior Lecturer, Moscow City University (Vtoroy Sel’skokhozyaystvenny proyezd, korp. 1, Moscow, Russian Federation, 129226). E-mail: shatalovaav@mgpu.ru; ORCID: 0000-0002-1398-792X; SPIN-code: 4630-9513.

The article is devoted to a comprehensive review of changes in modern ideas about the language norm, both in scientific discourse and in public consciousness. The main attention is paid to the dynamics of the norm of the Russian literary language, but some information is provided about the situation with the linguistic norm in a number of other languages, enabling a comparative analysis and the identification of general linguistic traditions. Addressing this issue is relevant nowadays, when profound shifts in public perceptions have caused noticeable changes in the language norm, which has created a sense of the needlessness of regulatory restrictions. The research material includes dictionary data, scientific research on the problem under study, as well as examples from national language corpora. The paper examines in detail the key mechanisms of the formation and evolution of the linguistic norm from the late twentieth to the early twenty-first centuries. The article touches upon the problem of the influence of colloquial speech, jargon, borrowings and Internet communication on the change of linguistic norms. The analysis of the processes in the formation of linguistic norms during this period demonstrates the main functions of literary language normalization: ensuring mutual understanding within large communities, preserving cultural continuity, and maintaining linguistic identity. Based on empirical material, it is demonstrated how the linguistic norm balances stability and adaptability, responding to communication requests while maintaining consistency. The selected language material shows that the use of previously tabooed and forbidden vocabulary in speech is no longer considered a sign of low education and morality. Instead, it is now but viewed as a verbal substitute for physical violence, a means of releasing aggression and negative emotions, while fulfilling a psychotherapeutic function for all participants in communication. However, the expansion of permissible vocabulary does not lead to the destruction of the linguistic norm and the complete abolition of all prohibitions. This only proves that the language norm is formed naturally, and the official bodies tasked with preserving language purity cannot always prevent the internal processes occurring within the language itself. In conclusion, the study emphasized that, despite the trends towards variability and liberalization, normative regulation remains an essential condition for the functioning of language as an instrument of social interaction in the modern world.

Keywords: norm formation, pronouncing norm, stratification, profanity

References:

1. Kostomarov V.G. Nash yazyk v deystvii: ocherki sovremennoy russkoy stilistiki [Our language in action: Essays on modern Russian stylistics]. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 2005. 287 p. (in Russian).

2. Crystal D. Into the twenty-first century – The Oxford history of English. Oxford, 2006. Pp. 394–414.

3. Yazykovaya norma v sinkhronii i diakhronii: kul’turnoye dostoyaniye ili posyagatel’stvo na samovyrazheniye. Pod redaktsiyey N.N. Germanovoy, V.A. Pishchal’nikovoy [Linguistic norm in synchrony and diachrony: cultural heritage or encroachment on self-expression. Edited by N.N. Germanova, V.A. Pishchalnikova]. Moscow, REMA Publ., 2023. 212 p. (in Russian).

4. Degal’tseva A.V., Sirotinina O.B. K probleme izmeneniya norm sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [On the problem of changing the norms of the modern Russian language]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Filologiya. Zhurnalistika – Proceedings of the Saratov University. A new series. Series: Philology. Journalism, 2022, vol. 22, issue 4, pp. 368–376 (in Russian).

5. Baranov M.T., Dobrovol’skiy D. Zapretnyye slova. Zametki lingvistov o russkom mate. Nauchnyy redaktor K. Kiselyova [Forbidden Words: Notes from Linguists on Russian Swearing. Ed. K. Kiselyova]. Moscow, Mif Publ., 2026. 240 p. (in Russian).

6. Vikulova L.G., Yermolenko G.A., Zhukotskaya A.V. et al. Yazyk, kul’tura, sotsium: essentia et existential [Language, culture, society: essentia et existentia]. Moscow, Knigodel Publ., 2023. 152 p. (in Russian).

7. Krysin L.P. Ocherki po sotsiolingvistike [Essays on sociolinguistics]. Moscow, FLINTA Publ., 2021. 360 p. (in Russian)

8. Sotsiolingvistika (pod redaktsiyey V.M. Alpatova) [Sociolinguistics (edited by V.M. Alpatov)]. Saint Petersburg, Lan’ Publ., 2024. 260 p. (in Russian).

9. Zhoashen Dyu Belle. Zashchita i proslavleniye frantsuzskogo yazyka. Perevod A. Mikhaylova i M. Tolmachyova [Protection and glorification of the French language Translated by A.N. Mikhailov and M.N. Tolmachev]. In: Ehstetika Vozrozhdeniya [Aesthetics of Renaissance]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1981. Vol. 2. Pp. 236–269 (in Russian).

10. Suleymanova O.A. K voprosu o normativnosti pis’mennogo akademicheskogo diskursa [On the issue of the normativity of written academic discourse]. Vestnik MGPU. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoye obrazovaniye – Bulletin of the Moscow City University. Series: Philology. Theory of language. Language education, 2017, no. 2 (26), pp. 52–61 (in Russian).

11. Slovar’ sotsiolingvisticheskikh terminov. Otvetstvennyy redaktor: doktor filologicheskikh nauk V.Yu. Mikhal’chenko [Dictionary of sociolinguistic terms. Responsible editor: Doctor of Philology V.Yu. Mikhalchenko]. Moscow, Russian Academy of Sciences. Institute of Linguistics named after Russian Academy of Linguistic Sciences Publ., 2006. 312 p. (in Russian).

12. Basovskaya E.N. Sovetskaya pressa – za “chistotu yazyka” (60 let bor’by) [The Soviet press-for the “purity of language” (60 years of struggle)]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2011. 334 p. (in Russian).

13. Krongauz M.A. Slovo za slovo: o yazyke i ne tol’ko [Word for word: about language and not only]. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2016. 480 p. (in Russian).

14. O chom oni? Sleng sovremennogo biznesmena [What are they about? Modern businessman’s slang]. Onlayn-shkola angliyskogo yazyka Lingua airlines [Online English language School “Lingua airlines”]. URL: https://lingua-airlines.ru/articles/o-chem-oni-govorjat-sleng-sovremennogo-biznessmena/ (accessed 26 January 2025).

15. Ionina A.A. Osobennosti sozdaniya i vospriyatiya teksta v Internete [Features of creating and perceiving text on the Internet]. Vestnik MGPU. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoye obrazovaniye – Bulletin of the Moscow City University. Series: Philology. Theory of language. Language education, 2010, no. 2 (6), pp. 33–39 (in Russian).

16. Khazagerov G.G. Styob kak sotsial’no-kul’turnyy fenomen: “kul’turnaya samooborona” ili “nravstvennaya ambivalentnost’”? [Banter as a socio-cultural phenomenon: “cultural self-defense” or “moral ambivalence”?]. Kommunikativnyye issledovaniya – Communicative Studies, 2023, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 474–486 (in Russian).

17. Sériot Patrick. Analyse du discours politique soviétique. Paris, IMSECO Publ., 1985. 362 p.

18. Wierzbicka A. Antitotalitarian Language in Poland: Some Mechanisms of Linguistic Self-defence. Language in Society, 1990, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–59.

19. Krongauz M.A. Russkiy yazyk na grani nervnogo sryva [The Russian language is on the verge of a nervous breakdown]. Moscow, Znak: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur Publ., 2008. 320 p. (in Russian).

20. Malyuka A.A. Ponyatiye “neprilichnaya forma”: problemy razgranicheniya yuridicheskogo i lingvisticheskogo [The concept of “indecent form”: problems of differentiation of legal and linguistic]. Verkhnevolzhskiy filologicheskiy vestnik – Verkhnevolzhsky Philological Bulletin, 2021, no. 2 (25), pp. 113–118 (in Russian). DOI 10.20323/2499-9679-2021-2-25-113-118

21. Meinunger André. Schmutzige Sprache? Beleidigung mit Fäkalbegriffen im Deutschen und in anderen Sprachen. Initiative kulturelle Integration. URL: https://www.kulturelle-integration.de/2022/12/02/schmutzige-sprache/ (accessed 27 January 2025).

22. Klushina N.I. Mediastilistika [Media stilistics]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2018. 184 p. (in Russian).

23. Klushina N.I. Russkaya razgovornaya rech’ v internete: ot kategorii razgovornosti k “novoy ustnosti” [Russian spoken Russian on the Internet: from the category of colloquialism to the “new oral”]. Trudy Instituta russkogo yazyka im. Vinogradova – Proceedings of the Vinogradov Institute of the Russian Language, 2024, no. 3 (41), pp. 185–192 (in Russian).

24. Ebel Martin. Fäkal, nicht sexuell. Deutschlandfunk. URL: https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/faekal-nicht-sexuell-100.html (accessed 27 January 2025).

borisova_e.g._7_15_3_245_2026.pdf ( 441.13 kB ) borisova_e.g._7_15_3_245_2026.zip ( 436.13 kB )

Issue: 3, 2026

Series of issue: Issue 3

Rubric: THEORETICAL AND APPLIED LINGUISTICS

Pages: 7 — 15

Downloads: 135

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU