Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 29.07.2026
Home Archive 2026 Year Issue №4 The cooperative speech strategy of sacred legitimization and the means of its implementation in D. Trump’s speeches
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

The cooperative speech strategy of sacred legitimization and the means of its implementation in D. Trump’s speeches

Alekseyenko I.V., Polyakova N.V.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2026-4-28-35

Information About Author:

Alekseenko I.V., graduate student, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (pr. Lenina, 30, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050), Assistant Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages for Engineering, Siberian Federal University (ul. Akademika Kirenskogo, 26, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660074). E-mail: iraleks@yandex.ru; ORCID: 0000-0001-7689-2373, SPIN-code: 6586-7181. Polyakova N.V., Candidate of Philological Sciences, Assossiate Professor, Tomsk State Pedagogigal University (ul. Kiyevskaya, 60, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634061), Assossiate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages of the School of Social Sciences, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (pr. Lenina, 30, Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634050). E-mail: nvp@tspu.ru; ORCID: 0000-0001-8890-2428; SPIN-code: 7277-6923

In modern political communication, an arsenal of speech strategies and tactics of their implementation is actively used to exert manipulative influence on the mass addressee. Cooperative speech strategies are often used to increase the number of potential supporters of politics. The strategy of sacred legitimation is one of them. The purpose of the study is to study the cooperative speech strategy of sacred legitimization used by Donald Trump in public speeches after the attempt on his life on July 13, 2024. The strategy under study is aimed at constructing a narrative of sacrifice and divine election, which serves as the highest form of legitimization, transforming a political candidate into a figure of a Messianic-redemptive kind. The article analyzes three tactics that implement the speech strategy of sacred legitimation: 1) sacralization of the event through the narrative of miraculous salvation and direct appeals to Providence; 2) construction of the collective heroic identity of the “community of destiny” through an inclusive “we” and the glorification of supporters; 3) demonstrations of moral leadership by shifting the focus to victims among “their own” and acts of material solidarity. These tactics perform not only a communicative and integrative, but also a myth-making function, allowing us to translate the political crisis into the plane of sacred history and create an emotional and symbolic alliance with the audience. The main means of implementing these tactics are: vocabulary with religious and providential semantics (God, miracle, blessing, fate, divine intervention), metaphors of physical unity and struggle (stand together, fight as one, bullet for democracy), epithets with heroic connotation (brave, unbreakable, fearless), repetitive syntactic constructions (the inclusive we in conjunction with the verbs of volition), rhetorical questions, antitheses (life / death, weakness / strength), as well as performative statements that formalize acts of solidarity. The source of the material was a 44-page corpus of texts of D. Trump’s key speeches, including a speech at the Republican Party convention on July 18, 2024, as well as his first public comments after the incident. The empirical basis of the research is 145 contexts in which the cooperative speech strategy of sacred legitimization is objectified. In extraordinary circumstances, the cooperative strategy achieves its highest goal – absolute legitimization – through an appeal to archetypal, mythological and religious layers of consciousness, which requires a revision of approaches to the analysis of political speeches in situations of extreme instability.

Keywords: cooperative speech strategy, speech tactics, narrative, means of speech influence, political communication, Donald Trump

References:

1. Burmakova E.A., Polyakova N.V. Obvineniye kak strategiya diskreditatsii administratsii Dzh. Baydena v amerikanskoy mediakommunikatsii [Accusation as a strategy to discredit the Biden administration in the American media]. Aktual’nyye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoy lingvistiki – Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 2024, no. 1, pp. 63–73 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2024-1-63-73

2. Burmakova E.A., Polyakova N.V. Kombinirovannyye taktiki, realizuyushchiye rechepovedencheskuyu strategiyu diskreditatsii administratsii D. Baydena: na materiale peredachi Tucker Carlson Tonight [Combined Tactics of Communication Strategy: Discrediting Biden’s Administration in Tucker Carlson Tonight]. SibScript, 2024, no. 26 (1), pp. 62–71 (in Russian). URL: https://doi. org/10.21603/ sibscript-2024-25-1-62-71

3. Van Dijk T.A. Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2014. 400 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107775404

4. Wodak R. The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications, 2021. 320 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739664

5. Fairclough N. Language and Power. Longman Group UK Limited, 1989. 253 p. (accessed March 1, 2026). URL: https://www.academia.edu/10033830/Fairclough_Language_and_Power_pdf

6. Anderson B. Voobrazhayemyye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma [Imagined Communities]. Transl. by V. Nikolayev, ed. by S. Bankovskaya. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole Publ., 2016. 416 p. (in Russian).

7. Kelsey D. Media and Affective Mythologies: Discourse, Archetypes and Ideology in Contemporary Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2022. 267 p.

8. Cassirer E. Sila metafory [Power of Metaphor]. In: Teoriya metafory [Theory of Metaphor]. Ed. by N.D. Arutyunova, M.A. Zhurinskaya. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. p. 33–43 (in Russian).

9. Barthes R. Mifologii [Mythologies]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo imeni Sabashnikovykh Publ., 2000. 320 p. (in Russian).

10. Issers O.S. Kommunikativnyye strategii i taktiki russkoy rechi [Communicative Strategies and Tactics of Russian Speech]. 5th ed. Moscow, LKI Publ., 2008. 288 p. (in Russian).

11. Karasik V.I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [The Linguistic Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena Publ., 2002 (in Russian). URL: https://archive.org/details/2002_2023250427/page/10/mode/2up (accessed March 1, 2026)

12. Blakar R.M. Yazyk kak instrument sotsial’noy vlasti [Language as a Tool of Social Power]. In: Yazyk i modelirovaniye sotsial’nogo vzaimodeystviya [Language and Modeling of Social Interaction]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1987. p. 88–125 (in Russian).

13. Shubert E.E. Diskursnyye yedinitsy, urovni, priyomy i printsipy rechevogo vozdeystviya v kognitivnom aspekte. Dis. kand. filol. nauk [Discourse Units, Levels, Techniques and Principles of Speech Influence in the Cognitive Aspect. Diss. cand. of philol. sci.]. Krasnodar, 2006. 160 p. (in Russian).

14. Westen D. The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation. 2nd ed. PublicAffairs; 2007. 488 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/politicalbrainro00west (accessed March 5, 2026).

15. Trump D.J. Full Transcript: Donald Trump’s Speech at RNC 2024. Singjupost.com. August 19, 2024. URL: https://singjupost.com/full-transcript-donald-trumps-speech-at-rnc-2024/ (accessed March 1, 2026).

16. Mondon A., Winter A. Reactionary Democracy: How Racism and the Populist Far Right Became Mainstream. Verso Books, 2020. 256 p.

17. Karasik V.I. Spetsifika vezhlivosti v raznykh tipakh diskursa [The specifics of politeness in different types of discourse]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya – Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Philology, 2024, no. 4(83), pp. 153–166 (in Russian).

18. Köllner T. Patriots, Heroes and Saviours: Narrative Foundations of Political Authority in Post-Secular Societies. Routledge, 2023. 268 p.

19. Chudinov A.P. Metaforicheskaya mozaika v sovremennoy politicheskoy kommunikatsii [Metaphorical Mosaic in Modern Political Communication]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2022. 248 p. (in Russian).

20. Karadzhe T.V. Evolyutsiya sakralizatsii vlasti [Evolution of Sacralization of Power]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Politologiya – RUDN Journal of Political Science, 2014, no. 1, pp. 86–95 (in Russian).

alekseyenko_i.v._28_35_4_246_2026.pdf ( 664.24 kB ) alekseyenko_i.v._28_35_4_246_2026.zip ( 659.02 kB )

Issue: 4, 2026

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: GERMANIC LANGUAGES

Pages: 28 — 35

Downloads: 35

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU