Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 12.11.2026
Home Archive 2026 Year Issue №6 Comparative analysis of phraseological units with the zoonym 鸡 – chicken, rooster in Chinese and Russian
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

Comparative analysis of phraseological units with the zoonym 鸡 – chicken, rooster in Chinese and Russian

Wang Q.

DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2026-6-7-16

Information About Author:

Wang Qi, PhD in Philology, Senior Lecturer, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics (Xinjiang, China). E-mail: oni.mus@yandex.ru; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0188-0092; SPIN-code: 1743-5323; AuthorID: 1117028

The study of specific features of phraseological units on the example of several languages is an urgent direction in the conditions of active interlingual and intercultural interaction. Chinese and Russian languages, representing nonclose-related formations and being the leading languages in the global space, require additional researches to identify common and distinctive features in the process of studying sociocultural realities and better assimilation. The object of the article is to identify the lexical and semantic features of phraseological units with the zoonym component 鸡 – chicken, rooster in Chinese and Russian languages. The key method in the work is comparative analysis, which has helped to identify universal and unique lexical and semantic features of phraseological units with a component- zoonym 鸡 – chicken, rooster in Chinese and Russian linguistic cultures. It has been established that in the Chinese phraseological foundation, the zoonym component 鸡 - chicken, rooster to a greater extent, has a negative connotation, symbolizing a weak physical condition (excessive effeminacy, since the chicken in Chinese linguoculture conveys the image of a small, weak, defenseless animal); reckless behavior (the image of the panicked behavior of a chicken in a coop is transferred to confused behavior of a person in everyday situations); life experience (the acquisition of wisdom based on overcoming difficulties, the need to learn from negative practices and events). It has been revealed that in the new sociocultural realities, phraseological units with the zoonym component 鸡 – chicken have changed their original semantics and currently have a positive connotation in the Chinese language: phraseological units with the zoonym component 鸡 – chicken reflect the significant role of women in modern society and represent female leadership and intelligent female guidance. Unlike the Chinese phraseological fund, the Russian phraseological fund shows a clear gender semantic marking of the zoonym components chicken and rooster, moreover, the studied phraseological units have a negative connotation. It has been proven that the zoonym component chicken in the Russian phraseological fund (both in the original and in the current one) is a destructive marker of a woman’s unattractive appearance, bad character, limited mental abilities, and immoral behavior in society. It has been proven that the phraseological units of the Russian language with the component zoonym rooster represent such negative male qualities as an ostentatious appearance, excessive pride, and boastfulness. The components zoonym chicken and rooster in the Russian phraseological fund, as well as in the Chinese language, also symbolize the negative aspects of lifestyle, namely the permanent difficulties in life and the need to overcome them regularly.

Keywords: phraseological unit, zoonym component 鸡 – chicken, rooster, Chinese phraseological fund, Russian phraseological fund, lexical and semantic features

References:

1. Alefirenko N.F. Frazeologiya v svete sovremennykh lingvisticheskikh paradigm [Phraseology in the Light of modern linguistic paradigms]. Moscow, Elpis Publ., 2008. 271p. (in Russian).

2. Kovshova M.L. Lingvokul’turologicheskiy analiz idiom, zagadok, poslovits i pogovorok: antroponimicheskiy kod kul’tury [Linguistic and cultural analysis of idioms, riddles, proverbs and sayings: The Anthroponymic code of culture]. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2024. 400 p. (in Russian).

3. Kovshova M.L. Lingvokul’turologicheskiy metod vo frazeologii. Kody kul’tury [The linguistic and cultural method in phraseology. Culture Codes]. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2016. 400 p. (in Russian).

4. Elgeshina A.S. Natsional’no-kul’turnaya spetsifika frazeologizmov russkogo yazyka s komponentom-zoonimom [National and cultural specifics of Russian phraseological units with a zoonym component]. Nizhniy Novgorod, Avtor Publ., 2023. 62 p. (in Russian).

5. Mokiyenko V.M., Felitsyna V.P. Russkiye frazeologizmy. Lingvostranovedcheskiy slovar’ [Russian phraseological units. Linguistic and regional dictionary]. 1990. 224 p. (in Russian).

6. Voloshina T.G., Lazareva Ya.V., Kopytina N.N. Kul’turnaya sostavlyayushchaya v semantike ustoychivykh vyrazheniy [The cultural component in the semantics of stable expressions]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2023, no. 5, pp. 74–79 (in Russian).

7. Voytsekhovich I.V. Prakticheskaya frazeologiya sovremennogo kitayskogo yazyka [Practical phraseology of the modern Chinese language]. Moscow, Vostok-Zapad Publ., 2007. 509 p. (in Russian).

8. Van S. Tipy frazeologicheskikh sootvetstviy v russkom i kitayskom yazykakh [Types of phraseological correspondences in Russian and Chinese]. Simvol nauki – A symbol of science, 2016, no. 5, pp. 265–268 (in Russian).

9. Yuj V., Omel’chenko L.N. Tipy sootvetstviy russkikh i kitayskikh frazeologizmov s komponentom “yazyk” [Types of correspondences of Russian and Chinese phraseological units with the “language” component]. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Yazyk. Literatura. Kul’tura – Bulletin of the Buryat State University. Language. Literature. Culture, 2017, no. 4, pp. 16–21 (in Russian).

10. Van Ci.  Informatsiya o kul’ture naroda v semantike ustoychivykh vyrazheniy s komponentom-fitonimom “sliva” i “dub” [Information about the culture of the people in the semantics of stable expressions with the phytonym component “plum” and “oak”]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologicheskiye nauki, 2022, no. 1, pp. 109–116 (in Russian).

11. Babanova S.Yu., Chernikova A.A. Comparative analysis of phraseological units with proper names in English and Russian [Comparative Analysis of Phraseological Units with Proper Names in English and Russian]. Humanitarian Scientific Bulletin – Humanitarian Scientific Bulletin, 2017, no. 3, pp. 29–37 (in Russian).

12. Il’yushchenko N.S. Sopostavitel’nyy analiz semnogo sostava frazeologicheskikh edinits v angliyskom i russkom yazykakh [Comparative analysis of the seminal composition of phraseological units in English and Russian]. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy zhurnal – International Scientific Research Journal, 2016, no. 5 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18454/IRJ.2016.47.170

13. Sklyarova N.G. Internatsional’noye i natsional’noye v lingvokul’turakh (na materiale russkoy i angliyskoy frazeologii) [International and national in linguistic cultures (based on Russian and English phraseology)]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2022. 194 p. (in Russian).

14. Mikhaylova Yu.N., Chzhao I. Kul’turnyye konnotatsii zoonimov v russkoy i kitayskoy frazeologii [Cultural connotations of zoonyms in Russian and Chinese phraseology]. Izvestiya UrFU. Seriya 2. Gumanitarnye nauki – Izvestiya UrFU. Series 2. Humanities, 2016, no.4, pp. 168–181 (in Russian).

15. Ma L. Tipy frazeologicheskikh edinits v russkom i kitayskom yazykakh [Types of phraseological units in Russian and Chinese]. Uchyonyye zapiski UO «VGU im. P.M. Masherova», 2011, no.12, pp. 198–204 (in Russian).

16. Van Ci, Voloshina T.G. Sopostavitel’nyy analiz leksiko-semanticheskikh osobennostey frazeologizmov s komponentom-bionimom v russkom i angliyskom yazykakh [Comparative Analysis of Lexical and Semantic Features of Phraseological Units with a Bionym Component in Russian and English]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State Univeristy, 2025, no. 9, pp. 82–92 (in Russian).

17. 中国现代汉语语料库. URL: http://ccl.pku.edu.cn/. Natsional’nyy korpus sovremennogo kitayskogo yazyka [The National Corpus of Modern Chinese] (in Chinese). URL: http://ccl.pku.edu.cn/ (assessed 13 January 2025).

18. 汉语成语大词典. 北京:商务印书馆. 2014 年. Bol’shoy frazeologicheskiy slovar’ kitayskogo yazyka [Large phraseological dictionary of the Chinese language]. Beijing, Commercial publishing house Publ. (in Chinese).

19. 吴国华,杨喜昌. 文化语义学. 北京: 军事宜文出版社, 2000. 258 页. Wu Guohua, Yang Xichang. Kul’turnaya semantika [Cultural semantics]. Beijing, Junshi Yiwen Publ., 258 p. (in Chinese).

20. 分类汉语成语大词典》王勤, 马国凡主编, 济南: 山东教 育出版社, 1995. 1357 页. Bol’shoy slovar’ klassifitsirovannykh kitayskikh frazeologizmov. Pod redaktsiyey Van Cin’, Ma Gofan’ [A large dictionary of classified Chinese phraseological units edited by Wang Qin, Ma Guofan]. Jinan: The Shandong Enlightenment, 1357 p. (in Chinese).

21. 汉语成语大词典》朱祖延主编, 北京: 中华书局, 2012. 1551 页. Bol’shoy frazeologicheskiy slovar’ kitayskogo yazyka, pod redaktsiyey Chzhu Czuyan’ [A large phraseological dictionary of the Chinese language / ed. Zhu Zuyan]. Beijing, Chinese Book Publishing, 1551 p. (in Chinese).

22. Vasilyev A.I. Frazeologicheskiy slovar’ yazyka I.A. Bunina [I.A. Bunin’s phraseological dictionary of the language]. Yelets, Yelets State University named after I.A. Bunin Publ., 2011. 400 p. (in Russian)

23. Kuznetsov S.A. Sovremennyy tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Glavnyy gredaktor S. A. Kuznetsov [Modern explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. Chief editor S. A. Kuznetsov]. Saint Petersburg, Norint Publ., 2005. 960 p. (in Russian)

24. Larionova Yu.A. Frazeologicheskiy slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Phraseological dictionary of modern Russian language]. Moscow, Adelant Publ., 2014. 512 p. (in Russian).

wang_q._7_16_6_248_2026.pdf ( 609.1 kB ) wang_q._7_16_6_248_2026.zip ( 602.94 kB )

Issue: 6, 2026

Series of issue: Issue 6

Rubric: THEORETICAL, COMPARATIVE-CONTRASTIVE AND APPLIED LINGUISTICS

Pages: 7 — 16

Downloads: 1

For citation:


2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU

Данный сайт применяет файлы cookie. Продолжая его использование, вы соглашаетесь на обработку этих данных. Если вы не согласны, пожалуйста, покиньте сайт.