Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 03.01.2026
Home Search
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Search

- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

#SearchDownloads
1

Evolutionary aspects connected with both sexless and sexual reproduction of mountain plants // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2002. Issue 2 (30). P. 46-50

The peculiarities of reproduction of mountain plants connected with extreme conditions of inhabitants are considered. It is stated that high-mountain plants present a considerable variety of systems, and that corresponds to the variety of inhabitants in the mountain landscape.

1217
2

Problems of Terminology in Ecological Morphology of Plants // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2003. Issue 4 (36). P. 61-66

The article gives the critical analysis of biomorphoiogical terminology that is used in modern botany. Different approaches to the plant life form as a key term in biomorphology that are taken in different Russian and Western European research schools are discussed. On the base of the icritical analysis, expediency of physiognomic approach to the definition of plant life form is shown.

1465
3

Spatial Strategies of the Plants // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2006. Issue 6 (57). P. 166-167

Photosynthesising surface extension tendency is characteristic for the most of plants that determinates high rate of growth and space expansion. Such plants can be called «occupants», and their life forms considered as «open». At extreme environment conditions (deserts, high-mountains, polar biomes), not space occupation but homeostasis maintenance by the surface area restriction due to spherical, compact life forms development, became the priority strategy (cushion plants, cactuses, etc.). These plants are «limiters», and their life forms are «closed»

1448
4

THE INFLUENCE OF THE CLIMATE FEATURES ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF SOME HIGH-MOUNTAIN VEGETATION TYPES IN ALTAY // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2009. Issue 6 (84). P. 132-137

The dependence of various high-mountain vegetation types on the climate features and the climatic tolerance of the plant communities are revealed on the base of long-term field research in Altay mountains.

Keywords: climate, high-mountain, ecological factors, vegetation types, habitats

1460
5

THE ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION OF HIGH-MOUNTAINOUS LANDSCAPES OF TEMPERATE AND SUBTROPICAL ZONES OF EURASIA IN THE SYSTEM OF MOUNTAIN ZONALITY // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2009. Issue 11 (89). P. 161-167

On the analogy of ideal continent concepts, spatial distribution of high-mountainous landscapes of temperate and subtropical zones of Eurasia depending on altitude and climate aridity is analyzed.

Keywords: high-mountain, landscape, vegetation

1375
6

Trends of Synmorphological Differentiation of Pseudotundra of Vodopadny Plateau (North-Tc huja ridge, Altai Republic) // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2011. Issue 5 (107). P. 84-90

Biomorphological spectra in pseudo tundra phytocoenoses are analysed at the article. It is shown that the ecotopic differentiation of phytocoenoses in extreme conditions is reflected in the composition of life forms, which have a significant functional loading in extreme conditions.

Keywords: vegetation, life forms, synmorfology, pseudotundra, high mountains

1442
7

CORRELATION OF SPECIES AND BIOMORPHOLOGICAL VARIETIES IN THE STRUCTURE OF PHYTOCOENOSIS // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2011. Issue 8 (110). P. 67-69

The relative biomorphological diversity reflects the proportion of life forms and species in phytocenoses. In extreme conditions a decrease in species diversity of plants in phytocenoses can be partly compensated by their biomorphological varienty, which has a positive effect on their stability.

Keywords: biodiversity, phytocenoses, species, life forms, biomorphs

1412
8

ABOUT THE CONNECTION BETWEEN EPIMORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE OF HIGH-MOUNTAIN PLANTS AND THE VOLUME OF REALIZED ECOLOGICAL NICHE AND LIFE STRATEGIES IN CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2012. Issue 7 (122). P. 132-138

The connection of epimorphological structure with ecological strategies and reproduction features of plants in extreme high-mountain conditions is considered in the article. There is shown, that the approaching to the ecotopic limit furthers the growth of life forms diversity and plants sizes.

Keywords: high-mountain (alpine) plants, life form, ecotop, thermal regime of plant, ecological niche, ecological strategies, spatial strategies, reproduction strategies

1442
9

DISTRIBUTION, SYNMORPHOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF DRYAS-DOMINATED TUNDRA IN ALTAI // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 8 (136). P. 100-107

The distribution, climatological and ecological analyses revealed that tundra plant communities dominated by Dryas have relatively small range of ecological tolerance. The structure of tundra is defined by biomorphological features of dominant species, Dryas oxyodonta Juz., and specific character of their relations to other components of the community.

Keywords: Dryas-dominated tundra, high-mountain phytocoenoses, synmorphology, biomorphological specters of plants

1410

2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU