Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 17.02.2026
Home Search
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2026 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Search

- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

#SearchDownloads
1

PHENOMENON OF “THE SACRIFICED GENERATION” IN F. M. DOSTOYEVSKY’S “A WRITER’S DIARY” (JUNE, 1873, JANUARY, 1876) // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2015. Issue 10 (163). P. 114-118

Article is devoted to research of “the offered generation” as historically caused phenomenon of the Russian culture through a prism of an author's literary viktimologiya of F. M. Dostoyevsky. The analysis of a victimological discourse of “A Writer`s Diary” allows to reveal the most important axiological aspects of a concept “victim” and system of its realization in various issues of this monomagazine. Developing a victimological perspective in fiction and publicistic texts, the writer at the level of idea shows the reasons of emergence of various types of criminals and victims, comes to a conclusion about their self-reproducibility on a global scale of the state. “The offered generation” becomes result of action of similar destructive processes of valuable deformation of the personality, the contradictory relations of the legal legislation with the principles of humanity and the Divine law.

Keywords: F. M. Dostoevsky, A Writer’s Dairy, victim, literary victimology, author, discourse, publicism, genre, axiology, spiritual imperatives

1295
2

MEANS OF REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT“VICTIM” IN F. M. DOSTOYEVSKY’S NOVEL “CRIME AND PUNISHMENT” // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2016. Issue 3 (168). P. 125-129

The article deals with the analysis of the means of representation of a concept “victim” in the image of Rodion Raskolnikov in F. M. Dostoyevsky’s novel “Crime and punishment”. The concept “victim” in the text of the novel of F.M. Dostoyevsky “Crime and punishment” is realized at various structural and semantic levels. An image of Raskolnikov consistently embodies in the novel various semantic aspects of a concept “victim” (the victim of the fashionable theory and own ambitions, generation as the victim of a critical era, etc.). The principles of polyphony when the opinion of the reader is created indirectly through the relation of characters of the novel shown in the speech and thoughts become the most significant for formation of reception.

Keywords: F. M. Dostoevsky, “Crime and punishment”, Rodion Raskolnikov, image, hero, axiology, concept, victim, victimology, polyphonism, reception

1421
3

STUDYING OF THE PROBLEM OF RESPONSIBILITY IN THE NOVEL OF F. M. DOSTOEVSKY “CRIME AND PUNISHMENT” AND SPIRITUAL AND MORAL EDUCATION OF PUPILS // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2017. Issue 2 (179). P. 119-123

The article is devoted to the analysis of methodical potential of the use of an axiological perspective of F. M. Dostoyevsky’s novel “Crime and Punishment” in the spiritual and moral education of modern schoolchildren. The solution of this methodical problem requires integrated approach and the appeal to the findings of psychology, pedagogy and philosophy. As the representative material illustrating theoretical understanding of the problem of responsibility as a significant aspect of spiritual and moral education in modern educational space serves the analysis of images of the novel’s heroes-ideologists – Rodion Raskolnikov and Sonya Marmeladova, showing different world outlook and behavioural strategy of implementation of responsibility as the axiological base of the personality. The problem of responsibility is one of the most urgent for discussion of the novel “Crime and Punishment” at the lessons of literature, accomplishment of research and project work in extracurricular activities as, on the one hand, it corresponds to the age features of seniors, and on the other hand, is rather representative for this novel of the writer. The value-oriented approach to studying of the perspective of the novel allows to develop one’s own world outlook and to realize it further in forming of a vector of life with orientation to supermotivations. Educational potential of studying creative work of Dostoyevsky can be widely used in the educational process when studying other humanitarian disciplines (Russian, history, social science) and to promote implementation of priorities of national educational policy.

Keywords: F. M. Dostoyevsky, “Crime and Punishment”, axiology, problem, responsibility, hero, Raskolnikov, Sonya Marmeladova, spiritual and moral education

1680

2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU