Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin
RU EN






Today: 07.01.2026
Home Search
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2012 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2011 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
      • Issue №13
    • 2010 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2009 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2008 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2007 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
    • 2006 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
      • Issue №10
      • Issue №11
      • Issue №12
    • 2005 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2004 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 2003 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
    • 2002 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2001 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
    • 2000 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
      • Issue №8
      • Issue №9
    • 1999 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
      • Issue №7
    • 1998 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
      • Issue №5
      • Issue №6
    • 1997 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Manuscript submission
  • Received articles
  • Accepted articles
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

TSPU Bulletin is a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal.

E-LIBRARY (РИНЦ)
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Google Scholar
European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)
Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Search

- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

#SearchDownloads
1

Elementary School is the Field of Joint Activity // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2003. Issue 2 (34). P. 58-67

The article presents the sight on a modern elementary school from the concept of pedagogics of joint activity and generalizes the author's experience of work with the teach¬ers of elementary school of joint activity. The author opens the educational contents of joint activity, different types of joint action (closed, inverted, open) and their communica-tion with the different contents of education. The assump¬tion of the author of interaction of quality of joint activity with the different contents of education proves to be true by ex¬perimental results received at school of joint activity. The article submits the diagnostic techniques of the analysis of quality of joint activity and results of this diagnostics.

Keywords: -

1593
2

The Role of the Pedagogue’s Position in Changing of the Content of Education // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2005. Issue 2 (46). P. 18-21

The article represents the theoretical analysis of role of a pedagogical position of influence in the content of changing of the education. The author analyzes a traditional view at the teacher’s position like a generator of knowledge to pupils, which is in fact an antiauthoritarian position and it is revealed in join interactivity of child and adult. The modern educational situation demands reconsiderations of this state of things and to hold another position as an adviser, tutor, helper, observer. All this positions are linked with so called “mediation” as special type of pedagogical activity, which is being described by the author.

1519
3

Kuznetsova. Design Activity in the Practice of the Teacher the Elementary School // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2006. Issue 10 (61). P. 65-68

In the article questions of the organization of design activity in the elementary school are examined. The authors represent the stages of design activity, show the characteristic properties of this activity as the subject activity of the child, i.e., of activity in the private venture. Stages are reinforced by the concrete content based on example of one of the projects in the rural school.

1815
4

THE POSITION OF A TEACHER IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2010. Issue 2 (92). P. 65-69

The article is devoted to the problem of the project activity in elementary school. The author opens the characteristics of education position in joint activity as a leader, organizer, participant and the differences of this position in closed and open joint activity.

Keywords: joint activity, project activity, education position, closed and open joint activity

2136
5

THE FINNISH EXPERIENCE IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2011. Issue 10 (112). P. 128-131

In the article presents some features of Finland educational system, which is one of the world leaders in education. The article is based on the data of the author’s trip to Kuopio (province Savona) in Mai 2011.

Keywords: levelling politics, accessibility of education, general education, training of school teachers.

1455
6

OPEN JOINT PROGRAMME OF TEACHER AND CHILD: CONTENT, EVIDENCE, RESULTS // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2012. Issue 4 (119). P. 198-202

This article deals with the phenomenon of open joint action as a special type of interaction between the teacher and the student. The subject of consideration is the word semantics “open”, and the characteristics of opening joint educational content. Justifi ed the allocation of the action as the basic units of educational content in elementary school.

Keywords: open, the openness, the opening joint program, the communication, the opened and closed systems

1542
7

THE HUMANITARIAN FEATURES OF INNOVATION FOR THE TEACHER COMPETENCE FORMATION AT PRIMARY SCHOOL // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 9 (137). P. 194-196

The possibilities of humanitarian management of educational innovation as condition of teacher competence are considered. There was shown the administrative mechanisms in the organization of innovative educational activities at elementary school.

Keywords: the liberal governance, the innovative educational program, the portable pedagogic action

1387
8

GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COURSE “PHYSICAL TRAINING” IN THE NEW EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 12 (140). P. 191-193

The article deals with the educational objectives of the subject “Physical Training” in modern elementary school, its place in the overall development of the child. The author highlighted content lines and types of lessons, characterized the activity approach to lessons and classes in physical training.

Keywords: description of the graduate, educational tasks, parts and content of the subject, physical training lesson

1730
9

THEORY AND PRACTICE OF HEALTH-SAVING IN MODERN PRIMARAY SCHOOL // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 12 (140). P. 194-196

The authors consider the nature and components of health-technologies, including in terms of improving physical training techniques. The article emphasizes the importance of polysubject approach in improving the organization of work with younger students.

Keywords: Preservation and strengthening of health, health-saving technologies, fitness component polysubject approach

1444
10

USE OF NATIOANAL GAMES AND SPORTS AT PHYSICAL TRAINING LESSONS // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013. Issue 12 (140). P. 207-209

The article presents the teaching techniques of introducing Shor national games and sport events as a regional component of education into the process of physical training in school.

Keywords: ethnopedagogy, national and regional component of education, physical training theory and teaching techniques, Shor national games and sport events

1497
11

DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF OPEN PROFESSIONALISM OF A TEACHER AS A RESEARCH PROBLEM // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2016. Issue 1 (166). P. 88-90

The paper is dedicated to the problem of teachers’ professional development in the context of realization of the new Federal Educational Standards. The objective of this research is the analysis of the open teachers’ professionalism concept as the alternative approach in teachers’ professional development and retraining. The purpose of the paper is to distinguish the notions: “closed and open professionalism”, “innovations in education and educational innovations”, “administrative and humanitarian management actions”. The author makes the connection between teachers’ professional development and their participation in preparing and realizing innovative programs; between humanitarian andragogic support and development of professionally personal qualities. Finally, the author clarifies the teachers’ professional development as not as a reproduction of the same functions but a real part in creating new educational practice.

Keywords: teachers’ professional development, professional samples, educational innovations, humanitarian management actions, open teachers’ professionalism

1232
12

ON THE PROBLEM OF FORMATION YONGER SCHOOLCHILDREN’S ABILITIES TO WORK WITH INFORMATIONAL TEXT // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2016. Issue 5 (170). P. 28-31

The paper is devoted to the problem of younger schoolchildren’s training to reading informational texts. This problem is actualized with the results of international tests to asses students’ reading competence. The author analyzes how to work with informational texts in the textbook “The world around us”, shows shortcomings in the organization of reading process. Special attention is given to reviewing the types of reading. The specificity of the different types of reading in relation to informational texts is observed. Training semantic reading on the lessons is highlighted as the main objective of the work with informational texts. The author describes such types of reading as the viewing reading, introductory reading, selective reading and study reading. The instructional techniques of reading organization aimed to extracting and understanding useful information from the text are identified.

Keywords: semantic reading, informational texts in the textbook, viewing reading, introductory reading, selective reading, study reading

1209
13

FEATURES OF UNIVERSAL COMMUNICATIVE ACTION FORMATION AT SCHOOL OF JOINT ACTIVITY // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2016. Issue 12 (177). P. 24-27

The article describes the experience of universal learning action development in the field of communication at School of joint activity (Tomsk). Justifies why this particular group is supposed to be a base and, thus, how it is connected with regulatory and cognitive actions. Highlights the ways of communicative action formation related to the organizational models of joint activity (leadership, partnership) and educational technologies (discussion, development of critical thinking, group work). On the example of a practical lesson compares different approaches to universal communicative action diagnosis for the evaluation of effective group interaction skills. The author shows the involvement of all participants in the process of communicative universal action development and analysis.

Keywords: joint activity, universal learning actions, group interaction, diagnosis of universal communicative actions

1199
14

DEVELOPING INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE THROUGH COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITY PEDAGOGY // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2017. Issue 1 (178). P. 114-118

The article examines teaching methods aimed at developing students’ intercultural communicative competence whilst studying interpretation using collaborative activity pedagogy developed by G. N. Prozumentova. A special attention is paid to description of three collaborative activity organization models (authoritative, leadership, partnership). Authoritative model corresponds to closed collaborative activity which depends solely on the educator without any go-aheadedness of the learner; leadership model corresponds to “adressed” collaborative activity which implies a certain dialog between the educator and the learner, thus a certain independence of the learner; partnership model is associated with open collaborative activity involving a full-scale dialog between two equal partners - the learner and the educator. The partnership model is presumed as the most effective way of forming students’ intercultural communicative competence since it allows the partners to develop their own meanings, to grow personally and to encourage mutual personal enrichment. The educational experiment designed to develop intercultural communicative competence included different types of translation and interpretation exercices. These learning tasks were classified as either reproductive, constructive or creative which corresponds to three collaborative activity model types. The research has proved that the co-organisation of all three models with an emphasis laid to open (partnership) model has found to be the most effective way of developing students’ intercultural communicative competence as well as their interpretation skills.

Keywords: intercultural communicative competence, interpretation, translation, translation pedagogy, collaborative activity pedagogy, collaborative activity model

1763
15

FUNCTIONAL SEMANTIC DIAGNOSTICS OF JOINT ACTIVITIES AND TEACHING POSITIONS IN THE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2017. Issue 1 (178). P. 119-125

The research presents some important results of the diagnosis of functional-semantic content of joint activities and teaching positions in a foreign language classroom. Based on the test’s modification of G.N. Prozumentovа «Diagnostics of functional-semantic content of the joint activity and the position of the teacher as a participant and organizer», the authors developed a questionnaire adapted for the technical university. The purpose of this research is to identify the actual and preferred professional activities and teaching positions of joint activity organization. The test is a series of statements describing possible actions of the teacher that reflects its position in the different models of joint activity (manager, leader, and partner). Test results allow to identify actual and preferred professional actions and models in organization of joint activity of teachers and students. In addition, we presented the results, received from teachers of two different departments of the same university, which will be very helpful to understand the educational presses which teachers are applying in order to be successful in teaching foreign as a second language. We built the results the way you can easily distinguish both groups’ experiences and put them into the tables. The final table shows us the compared results of two groups and displayed them for more understanding.

Keywords: joint activities, foreign language, interactive learning, interactive methods, interactive teaching, authoritarian model, leadership model, affiliate model

1593
16

TO THE PROBLEM OF USING PROJECT AND RESEARCH ACTIVITIES IN KINDERGARTEN // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2017. Issue 8 (185). P. 42-45

The paper is dedicated to the problem of organization project and research activities in kindergarten in the context of realizing The Federal Educational Standard for Preschool Education. The goal of this research is to analyze differ ences between these activities and highlight their educational resources. The examples of incorrect organization of project and research activities in kindergarten are given. The author analyzes two articles from the magazine “Kindergarten: theory and practice” and proves that kindergarten teachers and parents often formalize children’s activities, perform the most part of the work themselves, restricting the cognitive activity of a child. The author offers a number of recommendations for preschool children’s parents about what can and can not be done at home in joint projects. Lack of understanding by teachers of the differences between project and research leads to inadequate choice of tools and methods and in addition to decreasing of educational resources in cognitive and practical activities. It is important to take into account that the project activity is an integrative activity, in which the playful, artistic, communicative and practical activities are connected. Finally, the author clarifies the thesis of teacher (parent)-child and child-child collaboration as the basic of project and research activities in the modern kindergarten.

Keywords: joint activity, cognitive activity, educational resources, project, research

1574
17

CONTEXT OF COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITY PEDAGOGY IN TRANSLATION TRAINING // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2019. Issue 3 (200). P. 61-68

Introduction. The purpose of the article is to reflect on the specifics of organizing translation training in line with the collaborative activity pedagogy of G. N. Prozumentova. Three models of collaborative activity between the teacher and students (authoritative, leadership, partner) and three types of joint actions between the teacher and students have been analyzed: closed, semi-open and open. For each model there are special types of educational tasks (reproductive, constructive, creative). At the same time, all translation exercises are characterized in the logic of a certain model of collaborative activity between a teacher and students, taking into account the different positions of its participants. Material and methods. As a methodological base of the research we have chosen a learner-centered approach as well as the concept of collaborative activity pedagogy between the teacher and students. We have analyzed the traditional methods of teaching translation and educational practices for training translators in a classical university, including teaching experience of the author. Results and discussion. It has been established that the majority of translation exercises are mostly reproductive and tend to an authoritative model of collaborative activity; therefore, it is important to use a variety of exercises, mainly dialogue exercises, representing a leadership and partnership model of collaborative activity pedagogy. It has been proven that an open collaborative action (involving the creation of new meanings, the interchange and mutual enrichment, non-didactic interaction of participants) is optimal in translation teaching. Students form socio-cultural knowledge, communication skills, ability to participate in collaborative activities, translation competencies. Conclusion. For the first time it has been shown that translation training requires not only modern methodological support, but also a pedagogical basis. The idea of co-organizing different types of interaction between a teacher and students in translation training with an emphasis on organizing open collaborative action is seen by the author as the best option for organizing learner-centered educational practice at the university.

Keywords: collaborative activity pedagogy, model of organizing collaborative activity, types of collaborative activity, training lesson, translation training

1385
18

BOOK REVIEW. JIN LI “CULTURAL FOUNDATIONS OF LEARNING: EAST AND WEST” // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2019. Issue 3 (200). P. 109-111

1342
19

METHODS AND TOOLS OF ORGANIZING TEACHER’S METHODICAL ACTIVITY // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2020. Issue 1 (207). P. 56-60

Introduction. The article is devoted to the problem of organizing the methodological activities of a school teacher and university teacher. Methodological activity is the most important component of a teacher’s professional activity, therefore it is important to understand in what ways it can be organized. This aspect is important not only for teachers of private methods, but also for any teacher of higher education, as he is a methodologist - the organizer of the assimilation of educational material by students. When preparing undergraduates as potential teachers, it is important to teach them different ways of organizing methodological activities. Materials and methods. The article was written on the basis of the author’s generalization of the teaching experience for undergraduates “Methods of Teaching Communicative Disciplines”, as well as many years of experience in teaching a course in teaching Russian to future elementary school teachers. Master students not only got acquainted with these methods at lectures, but also actively discussed them in tutorial mode. A comparative analysis of reproductive, constructive, research methods of organizing activities is used. Results and discussion. The characteristic of different ways of organizing methodological activities is given: reproductive, constructive, research. Тhe following comparison criteria were used: positions of participants in joint educational activities, subject of methodological activities, methodological tools, features of working with educational information, organization of the educational environment, result. Conclusion. As a basic principle of organizing methodological activities, co-organization and mutual complementarity of different methods are proposed. The methods are correlated with different models of the organization of joint activities of the teacher and students.

Keywords: magistracy, methodological activities, organization methods, training session, interaction models

1400
20

BOOK REVIEW. HATTIE J. A. S. VISIBLE LEARNING: SYNTHESIS OF THE RESULTS OF OVER 50 000 STUDIES COVERING MORE THAN 86 MILLION SCHOOLCHILDREN. EDITED BY V. K. ZAGVOZDKIN, E. A. KHARMAYEV. MOSCOW, NATSIONAL’NOYE OBRAZOVANIYE PUBL., 2017. 496 P. (EDUCATION ANTHOLOGY) // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2020. Issue 1 (207). P. 114-115

.

1486
21

Educational independence in the context of pedagogy of joint activity // Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2023. Issue 2 (226). P. 7-15

Despite the requirements of the updated FSES LEO and FSES OOO, which point out formation of the ability to learn as the most important educational result, teachers of secondary schools have difficulties in developing such universal competence as learning independence. The problem of analyzing the different quality of educational independence and different ways of its formation is posed. The aim and objectives are to analyze the formation of the student’s educational independence in the context of the concept of pedagogy of joint activity and to substantiate the idea that its quality may be different depending on what positions the participants in joint activity occupy. Methods of theoretical analysis: the study of the history of the issue, analysis of modern challenges of the development of educational independence, pedagogy of joint activity. Learning independence is considered in the context of the pedagogy of joint activities (G. N. Prozumentova), different models and types of joint activities are analyzed, as well as different methods for the formation of independent learning. As a result of the analysis, various qualities of independence and its different types are distinguished: educationalfunctional, educational-cognitive, educational. Different types of independence of a student are associated with different positions that he occupies in educational activities (performer, co-executor, partner), as well as different types of actions carried out without the help of an adult (reproductive, constructive, creative). In addition, the different nature of independence, which is formed in the process of school education, affects the subject’s acquisition of different experiences: educational (experience of solving typical educational tasks), cognitive (experience of selfrealization of the action of cognition and discovery of a new one), educational (experience of setting and solving actual personal tasks in the field of education). It is concluded that the teacher consistently forms these different types of independence, thanks to which the student masters various ways of organizing amateur activity (reproductive, partially exploratory, personal) and leads to the development of agency as a person’s ability to act as an actor.

Keywords: uncertainty, amateur activity, joint activity of a teacher and children, models of joint activity, teaching methods, involvement, different quality of independence

1092

2026 Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU